Summary of new Texas gun laws

The 2015 Texas Legislative Session ended, and so some new gun laws are going into effect. Biggest press goes to the Open Carry and Campus Carry laws, but there are others.

Here’s a link to the summary of the new laws from the Texas Department of Public Safety.

There are a bunch of laws going into effect that didn’t get much press. Pay attention to those as well.

Note that a lot of other laws went into effect. For example, a knife rights preemption will go into effect September 1, which should clean things up and not make simple pocket knives illegal in places like San Antonio.

One big thing for folks to realize. While traditionally new laws go into effect on September 1, that’s NOT the case with the 2 big gun laws.

Open Carry takes effect January 1, 2016.

Campus Carry takes effect August 1, 2016, and for public junior colleges August 1, 2017.

BE AWARE.

DON’T BE STUPID.

Oh, and it seems we have a new TLA. While we figured CHL (Concealed Handgun License) would become a HL (handgun license),  it seems it will now be an LTC – License To Carry.

We LTC Instructors are still waiting to get the full skinny from DPS, so you just gotta be patient like the rest of us. Once we know, we’ll let you know.

Handshakes aren’t always polite

Greg Ellifritz writes about how a simple handshake can be used as a ruse to get dangerously close to you.

I feel conflicted about personal safety techniques that make you come across as rude or unfriendly, because the majority of the time the situation is innocuous and now you just look like a jerk. But, there’s always a way to handle the situation that helps you maintain a friendly rapport yet keep you safe. Greg’s article offers a few such suggestions for dealing with this case.

One I recently picked up and will work to employ is how to disengage from street approaches. You know the situation: dude walks up to you asking for a cigarette or a light or the time, and there’s a host of ways to break off contact. A favorite of fellow KR Training instructor Tom Hogel is to say “Yeah, about 4:30” and keep on walking. It works because it’s an unexpected response to their script and resets their OODA Cycle. The response I recently picked up comes from William Aprill. His response is “No, but THANKS!” and saying “thanks” in a very cheerful and earnest tone. I like this because it resets the OODA Cycle, it responds and ends the contact, and you don’t risk coming off as rude — which I think matters not so much to dude, but in the eyes of others, especially if this happens when you’re in the company of friends that may not regard personal safety in the same light as yourself.

What stood out to me more from Greg’s article tho was his closing remarks regarding handshakes and open carry:

Hock Hockheim also has some interesting information on handshake problems in this article.  Have any of you open carriers considered this ruse?  What if someone approached you in a public place and said “I commend you for carrying your gun openly and appreciate that you are providing a visual deterrent against criminals.”  After saying this, he extends his hand to shake yours.  Would you shake?  If you are carrying your gun openly in a holster without retention, it might not be such a good idea!

2015-07-02 training log

Deload continues.

Nothing exciting to report. Just get in, do work, get out. Rest.

Based on Paul Carter’s “Guaranteed Muscle Mass” article.

  • Front Squat
    • bar x 5
    • bar x 5
    • 95 x 5
    • 115 x 4
    • 135 x 3
    • 165 x 2
    • 185 x 1
    • 155 x 5
  • Leg Press
    • 315 x 10
    • 315 x 10
    • 315 x 10

When you assume…

Whether you acknowledge it or not, you have a concept of what (your) attacker will look like.

Ask anyone about violent crime, about being attacked, and ask them to describe their attacker. Oh, they may not have fine-details down, like the color of their eyes, but they do have some sort of notion about the person – or the sort of person – that would attack them.

Often times it’s male, probably in the 18-30 age range. They’d probably be dressed in some sort of “covering garb”, like a mask or something else that obscures the face, with dark, long-sleeved clothing; people don’t imagine a Hawaiian shirt and Bermuda shorts.

As well, they might imagine the person’s circumstance, like they’re just some drug-addict looking for a quick score.

Stereotypes come from somewhere, usually seeded in truth. The problem comes when we start to base life-important decisions upon stereotypes.

I recently came across a discussion on Facebook on the topic of firearms. A person with a fairly anti-gun stance was coming from an angle of “assault weapons are stupid and unnecessary for home defense”. He said:

Most criminals look for soft, easy options. If you
don’t have an alarm system, but your neighbour does, and the crook is in your neighbourhood, guess what? Yup, you are getting broken into. Same goes for screens, and doors. They look for the soft options.

Now, he is correct. Fundamental rules of home safety/defense really start with other matters such as having locks and using them, having alarm systems and using them, and other things you can do to make your home a less-appealing target (relative to your neighbors). But this is not a discussion of home safety/defense.

What stood out to me was his assumption of who would be coming to break into your home, and under what circumstances. And thus, based upon those stereotypes and assumptions, whether guns (or a particular type of gun) was or was not appropriate/worthy/legitimate of use.

Back in April, John Hearne was on Ballistic Radio discussing the Newhall Massacre of 1970. If you’re unfamiliar with the incident, give a listen to the episode, or you should at least read about it.

Two men, Bobby Davis and Jack Twinning, were well-established violent felons before the incident, determined to not go back to jail and not be captured. In Newhall, they murdered 4 CHP officers. As they fled the scene of the initial shootout, the men split up. Davis came upon a camper, violently assaulted the owner, and took off in the camper. Twinning broke into a nearby home, and took the occupants hostage.

How do men like Davis and Twinning fit into your assumptions?

These were sophisticated, violent criminals, determined to do whatever it took to escape or die trying. They came upon innocent, uninvolved people – like yourself – and inflicted violence upon them for, what would appear to the victim as, “no good reason”.

Was this an anomalous situation? Certainly. But like many things, statistics are of little comfort when you’re the exception.

It is dangerous and risky to your life and the lives of those you love to predicate behavior upon assumptions, especially when there are solid facts that you could better predicate upon. Take time to examine your assumptions, discarding what is incorrect, and revising to make better.

2015-06-30 training log

More deload.

Opted to do chins instead of rows — more bang for the buck. Started thinking more about chins too. Wasn’t too long ago I couldn’t eek out one. Now I hit 3×5 pretty easily. The goal remains 5×5 before I progress onwards. I started thinking: what will be onwards? Will I go for 5×10? 10×10? Or maybe switch grips and work on pronated (pull-ups)? Dunno. But I’m just thrilled to be progressing. 🙂

Based on Paul Carter’s “Guaranteed Muscle Mass” article.

  • Bench Press
    • bar x 5
    • bar x 5
    • 100 x 5
    • 125 x 4
    • 155 x 3
    • 190 x 2
    • 215 x 1
    • 190 x 8
  • Chin-ups
    • BW x 5
    • BW x 5
    • BW x 5
  • BB Curl
    • 45 x 12
    • 45 x 12
    • 45 x 12

2015-06-29 training log

Burnout. I has it.

It’s simple. Too much stress, not enough recovery. Stress isn’t always bad, it’s just stressors — even lifting is a stress. But I know most of my stress is from work, and then not enough sleep. It’s all caught up with me. Heck, last Friday I didn’t go to the gym at all — truly no motivation, felt “crispy”, and figured not adding to the stress load and body breakdown and getting more rest would do me better.

I spent the weekend relaxing. Slept in, napped a bunch. I do feel a lot better today, but certainly not out of the woods. And since I’ll be taking a very long weekend due to the Independency Day holiday, well… I figure why not use this week as a deload. My primary order of business is to destress and un-burnout, so…. deload works well into that since again, lifting is stress and breakdown on the body.

Now I do like taking jack-shit deloads and just doing nothing. But while on this body recomp, Nick prefers I at least do something. So I opted to do my normal session but dropped extra work. For example, I didn’t AMRAP nor 50% set, and I left out the high-rep work. Basically just do the main lifts, work up, and that’s that. It’s pretty much how I’ll arrange the whole week.

That said, it does make me wonder. I’ve been following Paul’s GMM program now for 8 weeks (this is my 8th). Honestly, it’s still hard for me to say if truly it’s been better for me or not — it’s just one iteration. I think I’ll need to try it multiple times with not a lot of other life-variation to see how it goes. I will say tho, while on the one hand I like it, on the other… I don’t. I realize that I sometimes get up and am like “geez… I have to squat, again?” Granted I’ve come a long way and actually enjoy squatting now, and I don’t know if my groaning came from not wanting to do it again OR from all my accumulating burnout. And I also do miss good long working of some bodypart. I find this especially with my back, that just as I start to get a good thing going, back work is done. Is that truly best for growth or just ego satisfaction? I can’t say yet.

But I am wondering… should I spend the next some weeks doing something else? Should I try a Strong-15 Short Cycle? Should I go back to a more traditional bodypart split? Should I maybe drop down to 3x week? All notions being tossed around in my head right now. We’ll see.

I don’t want to make any decisions yet, because I know I’m not in the best mind to make a straight long-term decision here. The burnout would rather me cut back and “do nothing” for a while. So let me try to get over this first… and taking this week as a deload should help.

Based on Paul Carter’s “Guaranteed Muscle Mass” article.

  • Squat
    • bar x 5
    • bar x 5
    • 125 x 5
    • 155 x 4
    • 185 x 3
    • 235 x 2
    • 265 x 1
    • 215 x 6
  • Stiff Legged Deadlift
    • 145 x 5
    • 175 x 4
    • 215 x 3
    • 265 x 2
    • 305 x 1

Sunday Metal – Songs of My Youth – Heavy Metal

I like giving “Sunday Metal” a theme, and so this theme is “Songs of My Youth”. I found heavy metal as a teenager and it’s always been a big part of my life. I wanted to highlight some songs that stand out from those youthful days.

Not so much a single song or a band, but a movie and its soundtrack.

I was in grade school. I remember the family across the street had a treehouse in their backyard. I was friends with the younger boy, who had an older brother. This older brother had put up a movie poster in the treehouse, for the movie “Heavy Metal”. It’s the movie poster classic shot of Taarna, and that was quite striking in every way to a young me.

Of course, the movie has more to do with the magazine “Heavy Metal” than the genre of music. But still, that magazine, that movie, those songs, they all played a role in my youth.

Sammy Hagar’s “Heavy Metal” is still a perfect hard rock anthem

And Don Felder’s “All Of You”, and the segment of the movie… classic.

 

2015-06-25 training log

Every day, strive to learn something.

Today I learned that elevating my heels is helpful. I’ve been working on improving my front squat form because I want to get the most benefit out of them. A big part has been working to keep my torso upright, but it’s not just upright, it’s…. out? puffed up? Think trying to push your xiphoid process up towards the ceiling and how that “puffs” the chest out and UP, the shoulders pulled back, the head even goes back a bit, and boy do things stay upright. That sort of thing. Well, I’ve been wanting to try elevating my heels, so today I did so. I put some 5# plates on the ground (so maybe 1/2″ of elevation) and put my heels up there. Between that and the torso work, my form sure was different. I videoed a couple sets and I could tell the difference in terms of my torso angle. I also could feel it… it felt more natural, less fighting to stay upright. Depth tho was interesting, because I found myself feeling not just more natural/normal but I was also going deeper into the hole. So while on paper I hit the same sets/reps as last week, it was a lot more work given the deeper range of motion.

All in all, not too bad.

Interesting note. Then just this morning before writing this I happened to see a video of Dan Green doing some front squats. He had a very wide stance, feet angled maybe 30º-45º, but a very upright torso. Interesting variation, but it obviously works for him (who am I to question an all-time-world-record powerlifter?). Plus he deadlifts sumo, so it probably all plays together.

Anyways, all in all, not bad. I learned something. Will keep elevating the heels because it seems I’ll get more benefit.

Had to cut the session short tho due to scheduling. Did some lunges, but not as many as I normally should. Ah well, life sometimes.

Based on Paul Carter’s “Guaranteed Muscle Mass” article.

  • Front Squat
    • bar x 5
    • bar x 5
    • 95 x 5
    • 110 x 4
    • 135 x 3
    • 165 x 2
    • 185 x 1
    • 155 x 8 (AMRAP)
    • 155 x 5 (50%)
  • Leg Press (350 Method)
    • 315 x 17
    • 315 x 15
    • 315 x 12
  • Lunge
    • Did some on the way out of the gym… however many that was.

My First Open Carry Holster

So with (licensed) Open Carry coming to Texas, that means some (licensed) people are going to carry their handguns openly.

If you chose to do so, please do so with thought, wisdom, education, skill, and respect.

One part of this equation? Holster selection.

As the law has been passed, open carry of handguns in Texas can only be done if the handgun is carried in a shoulder or belt holster. As well, the law mentions “restraint holster” (whatever that is, but I’m sure they mean a holster with some level of mechanical retention), but only within the context of classroom instruction and the instructor – that is, it doesn’t APPEAR that you actually HAVE to carry in a “restraint holster”. However this is where wisdom comes into play, because you would be foolish to open carry in anything other than a retention holster.

Note: the above is somewhat speculation as we are still waiting on the Texas Department of Public Safety to interpret the law and implement the necessary portions within the licensing program (which I guess is now just a “HL” instead of “CHL” program?). We (C)HL instructors are still waiting to hear on things, so you’ll just have to be patient like the rest of us. And meantime, err on the side of caution and well… don’t be stupid.

Going with that, as an instructor, while I have my reserves about open carry, I acknowledge people are going to do it, and so it’s best as an instructor to have as much knowledge and experience in the matter as I can so I can most effectively guide people to good and reasonable choices.

So after talking at length with a Deputy friend of mine and doing a bunch of my own research, I picked up a Safariland 7377.

Why?

Why get one? Again, while I don’t see myself open carrying as a general rule, I want to be educated and have first-hand knowledge, so having my own holster(s) and actually using them is part of the knowledge equation. Ignorance never serves any positive end.

Why get this particular one?

Safariland is pretty much the gold-standard. This is life-safety equipment – more so given this particular context – and I don’t care to entrust my life and the lives of my wife and children to anything less than the best. Will I explore other brands? Sure, but might as well start with the gold standard.

Why the 7377 model?

First, I didn’t want any true duty holster. Why? I’m not a cop. But more simply, the duty holsters tend to be fashioned for duty belts, which can be 2″ or 2.25″ wide. I don’t have such belts, nor pants made with such wide loops. I have a 1.5″ belt, so duty holsters are not appropriate. Thus I went with Safariland’s “concealment” (i.e. same basic holsters but with mounts for 1.5″ and 1.75″ belts), but with a wonder just how well it would actually conceal.

Second, why the ALS system? I appreciate the fact that all you have to do is reholster and it’s locked – you don’t have to flip or engage anything to activate the retention feature. Granted, ALS-alone is only a level-1 retention, but still it’s something. As well, my understanding is the older SLS feature can deactivate if you’re rolling on the ground, etc.. Finally, there are people in this industry whose knowledge, skills, and experience I trust, and they recommend ALS.

Third, of the different models of Safariland, concealment line, ALS, the 7377 seemed more likely to conceal (vs. the 6377). I haven’t been able to compare the two in person, but at least from pictures, videos, and descriptions, it does seem the 7377 is able to be made thinner thus more concealable.

Why am I worried about concealment? This is an open carry issue! Because at least in my context, I see any chance of me being openly carrying as a state change. For example, wearing a suit, gun on my hip under the jacket, take off the jacket and now I’m open. Thus I need the ability for one holster to handle both states.

So after looking and much consideration, the 7377 was settled upon.

While I was at it, I also picked up a 6006 ALS Guard, because why not order it at the same time. Try it both ways, and if I do like it it makes it Level 2 retention.

BTW, if you’re curious what all this “retention level” stuff means, here’s Safariland’s explanation. Also note that Safariland only rates their duty gear with retention levels; their “concealment” line doesn’t get such ratings/verbage.

I placed my order, and it came in yesterday.

First Impressions

While the holster itself seemed fine, I’m not sure about the belt mount. It’s the 567BL Injection Molded Belt Loop. It feels solid enough, but some of the flex makes me wonder. Plus the little bars that go through the belt loop that you are to cut out to make fit a 1.75″ belt? I’m curious how well those hold up to abuse. So… the holster seems fine, no better nor necessarily worse than any good kydex holster. Just a wonder about the belt mount.

BTW, I have seen this and other retention holsters sold with a paddle mount. FFS… no, just no. I could maybe see it if you had it on a training version of the holster, but for actual carry? No.

The ALS worked like a breeze. Heck, I could barely tell it was even there! It’s quite a natural drawstroke, tho depending what you do with your thumb you may have to adjust. Me, I do tend to get a full grip when I draw, so I do have to (re)train to adjust for this, and certainly had more than enough times when I didn’t successfully disengage the lock because training artifacts and n00b (tho that mostly happened with the Guard installed).

I installed the ALS Guard. Holy crap! That beats your thumb up pretty quickly because it’s mighty stiff. Yes, it’s a good level of protection, yes it adds some complexity to the draw, but it’s still generally a natural motion. But disengaging is so stiff well… after a couple dozen draws I stopped because my thumb was getting tender; it’s a lot of impact on your thumb’s distal joint, which doesn’t have much padding. I could not see going through an all-day training class with hundreds of draws with this setup. But if this was something I had to carry, I would just suck it up, practice daily, and just build up a callous/tolerance.

The holster itself compared favorably in size to my Dale Fricke Nehemiah. The holster itself is just a hair larger, but not by anything I’d consider relevant.

Of course, the holster does sit further away from the body. I think something could be done to bring it a little closer, or at least get it so the gun butt is angled in a bit more with the contour of the body. I’ll have to play with it.

Did it conceal? Yeah, but it was very clothing dependent. Some t-shirts I conceal IWB with no problem manifested this huge wart on my hip. But some of my 5.11 concealment shirts concealed it reasonably well. Yes, I could bend and move and you might see the shirt move or bunch in an odd way, but most people are unlikely to notice. Jackets and coats shouldn’t be a problem. I would say this holster CAN conceal, but I wouldn’t call it a concealment holster.

What Next?

So that’s just my first impressions. Overall I dig it. I look forward to trying it out more and even trying other brands/models to further my knowledge of the topic.

BTW, here’s a good article on such holster selection. It is oriented towards cops, but much of the reasoning here is same and sound, e.g. buy good gear. I don’t agree with his saying the Serpa is a good system, but otherwise his approach is reasonable and worth a read.

 

KR Training June 2015 Newsletter

The KR Training June 2015 newsletter is now available.

In addition to good articles and useful information, there’s a special discount running for this Saturday’s classes. Click to see, and then join us on the range. See you there!