Open Carry – Legal vs. Tactics

So Texas’ new Governor-Elect, Greg Abbott says:

“If an Open Carry bill is passed by the House and Senate, I will sign it into law,”

The past week I’ve seen many people on both sides of the issue responding to this pledge. One thing that I keep seeing is pro-gun people commenting on the stupidity of such legislation because open-carry is stupid, dangerous, or insert your reason here. The argument tends to be to keep open carry illegal because it’s dangerous tactics.

I think it’s important to separate the legality of open carry from the tactics of open carry.

People tend to prefer options. I’m sure when you’re presented with a problem, you don’t like being forced to solve it by A – you’d be happier if you could choose between A, B, and C especially if B and C are better options, yes? We seem to prefer choice (our consumer patterns demonstrate this), because it provides better opportunity for optimal solutions.

And so, if Open Carry (of handguns) becomes legal in Texas , that provides law-abiding Texans with more options.

But just because it’s legal doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the right and best option for solving a problem. There remain many reasons why concealed carry is a superior tactical option. Yes, some people may choose their options unwisely, but unwise decisions are nothing new in this world and the only solution there is for people to seek further education.

I know some will ask what I will do. Will I Open Carry? Generally speaking, no – I will continue to carry concealed. But having the option is something I will appreciate because there may come a time when it will be the better option and I appreciate having the choice.

When making arguments for or against Open Carry, do separate out the legal aspects from the tactics aspects. They are both valid areas of discussion, but we shouldn’t use “bad tactics” as justification for “bad laws”.

2014-11-07 training log

Today…. it just was. Maybe a “78%” day.

Felt a little drag-ass to get to the gym — I wanted to sleep more.

I am starting to think about doing some cable rows after the BB rows, like 3×12 or something, just to get a good stretch and peak contraction. Geez… that sounds very bodybuilder-like. But I do think my back seems to benefit from more volume.

The curls… that was silly. With the EZ bar I don’t get full extension because of how my arms get positioned. So today I leaned forward at the hips a bit, which put the arms at a different angle and I got full extension. I think over 60 reps that extra bit of bottom-end work got to me and I stripped off to just the empty bar. Yeah, wuss I am, but I was going to get 100 reps regardless. 🙂

Based upon Paul Carter’s Basebuilding

  • BB Rows
    • 150 x 8
    • 150 x 8
    • 150 x 8
    • 150 x 8
    • 150 x 8
  • Meadows Shrugs
    • 70e x 12
    • 70e x 12
    • 70e x 12
    • 70e x 12
    • 70e x 12
  • Wide, Neutral-grip Lat Pulldowns
    • 125 x 10
    • 125 x 10
    • 125 x 10
    • 125 x 10
    • 125 x 10
  • EZ Bar Curls
    • 25/bar x 60/40
  • 2014-11-06 training log

    Really… I’m happy to be pressing again.

    I had to cut the pressdowns short… something felt annoyed in my left arm, shoulder and elbow area. Maybe just stress because I did push hard on a lot of the sets today… maybe just a light irritation, because now a couple hours later, things are feeling OK.

    Weight is holding steady, as it should during this maintenance phase.

    Nothing more to report really. Just a solid day.

    Based upon Paul Carter’s Basebuilding

  • Press
    • bar x 5
    • bar x 5
    • 65 x 5
    • 85 x 5
    • 100 x 8
    • 100 x 8
    • 100 x 8
    • 100 x 8
    • 100 x 5
  • Bent Laterals
    • 8e x 20
    • 8e x 20
    • 8e x 20
    • 8e x 20
    • 8e x 20
  • Upright Rows
    • 60 x 15
    • 60 x 15
    • 60 x 15
    • 60 x 15
    • 60 x 15
  • Triceps Pressdowns
    • 45 x 25
    • 45 x 25
    • 45 x 23
    • 45 x 12
  • Lifting Details

    Recently I’ve had a lot of people commenting or emailing me regarding the weightlifting I do. My logs only tell what I did that day in a synopsis for myself because I know what I’m generally doing otherwise. But since those details aren’t obvious from the logs, I thought I’d take a moment to fill in the blanks.

    Background

    I’ve lifted weights on and off since I was a teenager. All the lifting I did was always worshiping at the altar of Joe Weider – bodybuilding, with knowledge based upon what I gleaned from magazines. It was the only resource I had in my youth. It was alright, but inevitably I’d either wane in my interest or something else would take greater interest and I’d stop.

    My goals as a teenager were typical: big, strong, no wimps, get girls, and that sort of thing. But after I got married, took a desk job, and started to get squishy, well… things change. Biggest of all was realizing it was a chore to get down on the floor to play with my then-infant son. That’s a telling sign. I quit smoking (haven’t had a cigarette in almost 20 years), and the goals of some sort of “fitness” came to be a bigger priority for me.

    Driving Goal

    The main reason I exercise – regardless of specifics – is that I don’t want to become decrepit. It was stupid that as someone in their mid-20’s I couldn’t walk 3 flights of stairs without getting winded or get on the floor to play with my son. I saw people in their 40’s and 50’s that struggled to pick things up off the floor or couldn’t walk 3 steps without making it a big negotiation. I grant age will bring the things that it does, that I cannot guarantee how things will be in my life, but so long as I can help it I want to ensure I can enjoy the life I have while I have it. Many people “eat right” and “exercise” because they want to stay young and avoid aging and the inevitability of dying (extend life as long as possible). I accept that I have no true control over when and how I’ll die, so all I can do is ensure that while I have my life that I have the ability to enjoy it to the fullest.

    And so, I exercise and try to “eat right”.

    Yes, goals of “being stronger” and “looking good” are part of it. I do want to be strong. I do want to look good. But really, the driving goal is to enable the enjoyment of life, and that is the primary drive and guide in my decisions.

    That’s part of why I don’t expect to be a hardcore powerlifter, because that level of injury is not conducive to “enjoyment of life” (in my book). But yet, powerlifting is where it’s at for me.

    Rippetoe and Wendler

    I did martial arts for a number of years, and it was one of the better things for me, health-wise. For numerous reasons I quit, and settled into my desk chair again. I hated it. There was a small gym near my house so I checked it out, and about 3.5 years ago I started back into the world of weights – but for the first time at a gym instead of at home.

    I started out with a light, full-body, bodybuilding-like approach, because that’s what I knew. But just as I was getting into it I got sick (flu or something) and had to stay out of the gym. I had gotten bit by the iron bug again tho, so while I was laid up I devoured all the information I could on the topic. Hooray Internet, because that’s how I discovered Jim Wendler (5/3/1) and Mark Rippetoe (Starting Strength). When I went back to the gym I dove into Starting Strength, and after that stalled out for me I went on 5/3/1.

    I spent probably 2 years on 5/3/1 and made really good gains in size and strength, especially for middle-aged fart like myself. Alas, I suffered from mixed priorities: you can’t get big, get strong, and get lean at the same time as they tend to be goals that run counter to each other. So I would try to focus on one goal, get frustrated it wasn’t working, and flounder a bit. I know if I had focused more I would have made better gains, but it’s the path I took and because of it I learned a lot, so I don’t regret it.

    During 2014 I’ve been trying out Paul Carter’s approaches. I’ll talk more about them below.

    Powerlifting

    I will say a powerlifting style of weight-work sits much better with me (vs. Olympic lifts (snatch, clean and jerk), or bodybuilding). I like focusing on getting stronger because strong is useful. That I get bigger is a nice side-benefit. It was always in my mind to total 1000 lbs (how much you squat, bench press, and deadlift) and during 2013 I focused on that and at the end of 2013 I achieved that goal.

    To date, my best lifts are:

    • Squat – 325 lbs (Aug. 2014)
    • Bench Press – 250 lbs (Aug. 2014)
    • Deadlift – 445 lbs (Aug. 2014)
    • Press – 165 lbs for 2 reps (Dec 2013 – haven’t done pressing much since I went off 5/3/1)

    They aren’t huge numbers, but they are my numbers. And they are gym PR’s. I haven’t tried competing yet, but it’s on my mind to once I can make that a goal (presently I have other goals).

    Current Approach

    After a couple years on 5/3/1 (which I still really like and recommend), I opted to switch to Paul Carter’s approaches. Following things like his mass building routines, Strong-15 cycle, and presently I’m working with his Base Building methodology. I must say I really like how he does things because I feel I’m making the same sort of progress as I did on 5/3/1 but I do NOT feel as beat-up as I did on 5/3/1. I mean, I can’t recall the last time I deloaded, and I really feel no need to; on 5/3/1 I had to deload now and again. So making essentially the same gains but with less pain? I’ll take it.

    My main goal right now is defattening myself. I gained too much fat because I took too much casualness in the powerlifting mentality of “eat big”. I woke up a few months ago, got on the scale and was 265 lbs. My clothing wasn’t fitting — in a bad way. And it was evident when I looked in the mirror I was turning into a fat tub of lard. I also think all that weight was doing bad things to me in other ways, like stressing my knees and ankles, which already have enough issues to deal with.

    I’ve struggled with the weight-loss thing for a while, so I figured it was time to get serious. Getting serious included getting help. I heard so many good things about Renaissance Periodization so I hooked up with them. To date, it’s been about 3 months and I’ve lost a little over 20 lbs of fat. I don’t feel I’ve lost any muscle mass, and my strength actually feels like it’s going up, tho it’s really hard to judge that unless I measured things in the same way. Many more months ahead, but the “defattening” is my focus.

    While I do that, I still lift. Base Building actually seems to suit me well for this period. I can keep up with strength-oriented work, but well… you just have to look at how BB is structured and the goals around it. And frankly, I think it fits quite well. I couldn’t do 5/3/1, I couldn’t do any sort of “strength peaking” program. And a pure bodybuilding-style program would be mental agony. 🙂 But I think BB works and fits, for me, with my goals. I reckon I’ll stick with it while I defat myself. After I’m done defatting, I don’t know exactly what I’ll do but likely it will be working on a strength peaking cycle (maybe Strong-15) and seeing where I wind up. And come that point, that’s when I’ll start to think about doing a local competition (maybe just something as simple as Hyde Park Gym’s annual push-pull event). Competition may be my next goal, but until I achieve my current goal I’m not going to sweat future goals too much.

    More Details

    One detail that doesn’t reflect in my logs is rest time.

    I try to take no more than 60 seconds of rest between sets. When I was doing 5/3/1 I’d take as long as I needed, up to 5 minutes. Since I started following Paul Carter’s approaches, I dropped my rest periods down to about a minute (read Paul’s books, his blog, etc. and you’ll see the reasoning why). Yeah, when I did Strong-15 I might take a little longer on the heaviest work sets, but even then not much more (maybe 2 minutes?). In the end, I’m only getting stronger. Sure it was a slight hit at first to get used to it, but now I think that it’s more beneficial. Over time I’m obviously stronger, and I’m also better conditioned.

    I think the conditioning is a big part of it. I mean, I’d be out at KR Training hauling heavy equipment around and find myself sucking wind like crazy. But now? Not so much. I hate cardio (my answer: squat faster), so if I can do things like this to have some reasonable conditioning, I’ll take it.

    So it means lighter weights when I’m working, but I also think that it feeds well into sub-maximal training, which is being demonstrated more and more as an ideal way to be able to build strength and train for longer (see Wendler, Carter, Chad Wesley-Smith, Brandon Lilly, amongst others). I’m getting stronger, I’m getting bigger (in the good way), and not beating myself up as much. How can you not win from this?

    Conclusion

    That’s about it, in terms of filling in some details for folks that have wondered.

    By some terms I’m an “intermediate” lifter in terms of time spent and amounts lifted. By no means am I an expert, and I’m doing all I can to learn. This has been the most productive and fulfilling time I’ve had in all my years of lifting. I really wish I had known this when I was a teenager. The information was out there (Bill Starr was preaching stuff way back when), but I just had no idea. But I figure it took other bits of life, maturity, and other life-lesson learning to be able to have the discipline and attitude needed — and not sure I would have done it when I was a teenager.

    Yeah, it means I won’t turn into Ronnie Coleman, nor set records like Dan Green. I got started late. But I’ll do the best I can. I see too many guys in their 70’s doing awesome stuff, and I’d like to be one of those.

    Beyond the de-fatting of myself, I guess my next big strength goal would be to bench 300, squat 400, and deadlift 500. Frankly after I defat myself, those should be attainable with 1-2 years of focused hard work. But you know… it’s like Wendler said: once he hit a 300 lbs. press, what was his next goal? 305.

    Just one day, one plate, one thing at a time.

    2014-11-04 training log

    oooof…..

    So in the spirit of working up to my EDM, thought I’d do that today as well with my squats. Alas, seems I forgot what my EDM was. 😉 I thought it was 305, but it’s actually 315 (now that I look at my logs). Still, I worked to 305 and it went… mixed.

    I’ve been beltless for a long time now, but getting up towards my max I wear a belt. I did the 265 beltless, then the 285 added the belt. Yeah, you’d think you don’t forget how to wear a belt but apparently I did. Not really the wearing, but the fine-tuning of positioning so things don’t pinch or cause the body to be weird. I can sometimes get this nerve weirdness in the area from my beltline down to my knees (along my glutes and hamstrings). Putting the belt on for 285 having not worn one in some months, I get down in the hole and everything screamed at me — I hit some nerve thing just right. It wasn’t too horrible, but it was VERY mentally distracting. I did the 305 alright, but I was so mentally preoccupied with avoiding the pain I think I may have cut depth a hair short. So… bleah. not too happy about it.

    What it tells me is maybe I should get back to wearing the belt. I mean, if part of the intent of Base Building is to drill technique well… technique with the belt is a bit different than beltless. So maybe I should get back to wearing the belt so I can make sure technique is happy in this regard. I’ll think about it.

    Sumos… after the weeks of experimenting, I figured today would make a good case for actually programming it BB-style model 1. I have no idea what weight to use, so I figured just work up in 45’s. The 315 was quite the working weight, perhaps a hair much… 305 might have been better, but it’s possible 315 would be fine under normal circumstances. It was a workload for sure, so I reckon I’ll just stick with the 315 for a bit.

    I did NOT want to do lunges — I was pretty spent, but that’s the perfect reason to press on — the body will stop when it truly can’t do any more, and it’ll help improve work capacity even more. Glad I did it, but I know I’m going to be sore. 🙂

    So, a mixed day. Some good, some bad. Either way, lots of learning.

    Based upon Paul Carter’s Basebuilding

    • Squats (model 1)
      • bar x 5
      • bar x 5
      • 155 x 5
      • 180 x 4
      • 215 x 3
      • 235 x 2
      • 265 x 1
      • 285 x 1
      • 305 x 1
      • 190 x 5
      • 190 x 5
      • 190 x 5
      • 190 x 5
      • 190 x 5
    • Sumo Deadlift (model 1)
      • 135 x 5
      • 225 x 5
      • 315 x 3
      • 315 x 3
      • 315 x 3
      • 315 x 3
      • 315 x 3
    • Lunges
      • BW x 15e
      • BW x 15e
      • BW x 15e
      • BW x 15e

    2014-11-03 training log

    Every so often it’s good to review what you (think you) know to ensure you really know it.

    Over the weekend I reread the Base Building manual to see if there were any little things I missed regarding the protocol. I did. That every so often one should work up to their EDM to see how things are going.

    So today I worked up to my working (everyday) max that I’m using to calculate all my numbers, and it felt good and as it should be. One where you can do it crisp, but you have to take it seriously. Certainly I felt like I could have moved more, but that wasn’t the point. It felt good to work up to it, went well, and then back to work. Even in the work I did well. OK, so incline dropped off a bit, but all things considered it was good and quality. Overall I can see I’m progressing and getting stronger, which is the whole point.

    The Polquin Flies (calling them that to best reference the technique used) remain interesting to me. It puts you in a very mechancially poor position, but it really does stretch and isolate the pecs amazingly well. Still, my right shoulder isn’t the happiest with them, but I’m playing with some variables that seem to help. So, I’ll keep at them for a bit to see what comes of it.

    Based upon Paul Carter’s Basebuilding

    • Bench Press (model 2)
      • bar x 5
      • bar x 5
      • 115 x 5
      • 135 x 4
      • 155 x 3
      • 175 x 2
      • 195 x 1
      • 215 x 1
      • 230 x 1
      • 195 x 5
      • 195 x 5
      • 195 x 5
      • 175 x 5
      • 175 x 5
      • 175 x 5
      • 140 x 17 (AMRAP)
    • Incline Press (350 Method)
      • 85 x 21
      • 85 x 12
      • 85 x 12
    • Polquin Flies
      • 10e x 12
      • 10e x 12
      • 10e x 12
      • 10e x 12

    Why can’t we just ban “crazy”?

    A couple horrible stories in the news recently. But I think ones that are worth your consideration due to their greater implications.

    One was about 4 NYPD officers attacked by a crazy man with a hatchet. Another was about a beheading of an Oklahoma teenager.

    From what’s been reported so far, it seems what we’ve got are some random people with a heavy dose of “crazy”, attacking other people with an intent to inflict harm and death in a horrible manner due to their crazy.

    Where are the calls for hatchet bans? or machete control? Because you know if these attackers used guns, it would become fuel for those bent on banning guns. Why aren’t we seeing calls to try to control this sort of violence? Is this sort of attack somehow less worthy of your political attention?

    Or maybe perhaps it’s not about the tool/weapon. I mean, I think it’s pretty clear what’s in play here isn’t guns or hatchets or machetes, but plain old crazy.

    So why aren’t we working to ban crazy? I mean, if bans are so effective at stopping things, don’t you think a law against crazy would be the most effective solution?

    Of course we know there’s no reality in making that solution happen. Thus we look for other solutions, often things like “gun control”.

    But let me ask you something.

    Look at the NYPD hatchet case. What got things to stop? Was it legislation? Was it a ban on hatchets or the fact that murder is already illegal? Did they pee or vomit on their attacker? Was it talking to the attacker, be it begging and pleading, words of love and kindness, or stern words?

    No. It was a swift and violent response on the part of the NYPD officers, using guns to stop the attacker. There was no ability to call for help; only the people immediately on site right there right then were able to respond.

    Are guns, and swift, violent responses always the right answer? Certainly not! In fact, the overwhelming majority of problems in our world are not going to be rightly solved by the muzzle of a gun. However, there are some problems in this world that cannot be solved any other way.

    For every solution you offer as an alternative, I ask you to consider the viability of that solution — with intellectual honesty. Would you equip those NYPD officers with your solution? Will your solution enable them to go home to their loved ones at the end of their shift? Will your solution be effective at keeping other innocent people on the NYC street from being brutally murdered? Will your solution effectively stop the danger, the madness, the crazy?

    What if you were faced with the same imminent danger? If someone were charging at you wielding a hatchet with every intent on embedding it in your skull, can you honestly believe your solution will keep you alive? Are you willing to put it to the test?

    A ban on crazy – just like most bans – doesn’t stop bad things from happening. Effective solutions may not always be palatable, but we must always be honest in finding and applying those solutions.

    Sunday Metal – My Favorite Lazarus A.D.

    Saw an obscure posting to Lazarus A.D.’s Facebook page. Silent for so long, then a “2015!” posting (which is now gone….)… so maybe they aren’t dead yet, but who knows. Here’s hoping they will be back, because they were certainly one of the best of the “thrash revival” bands.

    “Revolution” is a perfect example.

    Always turn this up to 11.

    Skill Demo

    Aikido sword cutting demonstration. See, it’s not the tool; it’s the person using it. And if this isn’t the tool you use, because it is about the person using it, you as the tool user can learn much here that can be applied to whatever tool you choose to use.

    John Buol's avatarFirearm User Network / American Gunsmith

    Aikido/Sword instructor Koichi Kashiwaya Demonstration
    by Brent Yamamoto

    Notice that none of the techniques are overly complex, they are only simple diagonal, horizontal, and downward cuts. This is not to say that any of them are easy.

    Although some of the cuts are from a static position, most involve movement. In most of these sequences, he is moving…either before, after, or even during the cut.

    There are many good cutters out there, but most do so only from static positions. This is akin to standing still shooting holes through paper at the range…it is useful practice but it is not fighting. Fighting requires movement, along with the recognition that you must balance hitting while not being hit.

    Movement is not wasted, telegraphing is minimized. Muscles are relaxed rather than overly tense. Smooth is fast.

    Accuracy. At this distance the focus is on the target. He is not focused on his…

    View original post 195 more words