2018-04-16 training log

Week 3, and it’s rolling pretty well.

I didn’t want to get out of bed this morning (melatonin, perhaps) but off I went. Brain didn’t wanna, but body felt really good.

Again, I’m trying to keep my volume conservative — that I only rate a 1 if things were off the charts good; but if it felt “as expected”, leave it be. Today did feel really awesome, but I still rated it a 1 because again, I am striving to see if I can do more with less.

The squat warm-ups were hard, even 135. But when I hit 290, things rolled quite well. I felt good. I noticed I wasn’t as tight as I could be, in my upper body. But I think it’s because I’m taking a different approach to the descent. It really solidified a few weeks ago watching Kevin Oak squat 832 @ 242 for a new ATWR. If you watch it, his descent is just like… I’m going down. He’s tight, then it’s like a controlled drop of the bar, not like a squat descent. It’s hard to describe, but just watch how that descent looks different from a lot of other squat descents. I’ve found myself taking this mental approach to the descent, and it’s been good. The bar path feels better, the body feels better. There’s really not a lot of movement, nor even extraneous muscle tension — just “control drop” the bar and manage that, then hit depth and come out. Again, hard to describe, but it is different and feels good.

But it’s still difficult for me to judge where I am. I mean, when starting this cycle I was to program it with 285 as a 5RM. But today here I am hitting 290 for 5 with at least a couple left in the tank. I would thimk that, if 285 was the 5RM that last week (when I did 285) I should have gotten 3-4 (if I stop 2/fail) but I got 5. Then today, 290 and hitting 5 for more sets and still some in the tank. Am I stronger? Did I start too light? Is my body just remembering how to squat and it’s neural adaptations? I really don’t know. But there’s never harm in starting light. I look forward to how the next cycle will be set and how it will go as I think that will be more indicative.

Fronts went well. Same weight and sets, but an additional rep per set, which is great especially after the main work went up too. And here I find that the same approach of “controlled drop” really helps at keeping the torso upright.

Triples on the deadlift. While all the squat work got 3 minutes between sets, the deadlifts and everything else got 1-2 minutes of rest. Just boom boom boom, no big deal.

Feeling good.

RP Powerlifting, Strength Cycle, week 3

  • Squat (low bar)
    • bar x 10
    • 135 x 5
    • 225 x 5
    • 265 x 3
    • 290 x 5
    • 290 x 5
    • 290 x 5
    • 290 x 4
  • Front Squat
    • 170 x 8
    • 170 x 8
    • 170 x 8
  • Competition Deadlift
    • 135 x 3
    • 225 x 3
    • 275 x 3
    • 275 x 3
    • 275 x 3
  • Stair Calves
    • 65 x 10
    • 65 x 10
    • 65 x 10
  • Reaching Situps
    • 20 x 12
    • 20 x 12
    • 20 x 12

Sunday Metal – Metallica

Metallica, from 1983’s Kill ’em All tour:

on “Waiting for José”, and Harel Shapira

In “Bowling Alone”, [Robert] Putnam’s diagnosis of America’s decline is rooted in the loss of civic engagement and the decline in associated life. What America has lost, Putnam argues, are institutions – ranging from churches to book clubs – in which people can come together and do things as a part of a collective, as members of a shared community; what America has lost are Americans who seek institutions; what America has lost is the spirit that is at the heart of our democracy. It is the spirit that Alexis de Tocqueville noticed in the eighteenth century and claimed as the source of America’s strength. The Minutemen agree. And the Minutemen have that spirit. What they lack is not a democratic ethos. They are what people like Putnam and de Tocqueville and our whole liberal democratic political tradition want out of citizens; engaged, active, concerned.

From “Waiting for José” by Harel Shapira.

I met Harel about a year ago. He was a student in a class I was teaching at KR Training. As far as I knew, he was just another student. Turns out that’s not quite the case. 🙂 He’s also an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Texas, Austin.

Harel’s sociological interest is in guns, gun culture, firearms education, the culture of armed citizens, and the people within. He wants to understand why people join social movements, and a large part of that is the “doing” of those movements – and so, he seeks to immerse himself in the movements and “doing” them as well. He’s still an observer and tries to remain as such, but yet he must also participate. It’s quite interesting.

Harel wanted to speak with me (beyond class) on some topics. In part because of my role as Assistant Lead Instructor at KR Training, and also in part because of the incident I was involved in on January 5, 2015. More recently, we’ve started talking again regarding phase 2 of his research (which I don’t believe I can disclose at this time, but it’s a logical progression of his research). I have maintained I will always speak about that incident, because in doing so others can learn and perhaps the world can become a little wiser, a little better. We’ve had a few long lunches, talking at great length about all manner of things (and I truly enjoy our talks). But that’s not why I write today.

Harel’s PhD dissertation became a book: “Waiting for José – the Minuteman’s Pursuit of America“. Harel gave me a copy. On a long flight to Seattle I was finally able to read it – and I’m so glad I did.

The book is thought-provoking. It caused me to reflect. It made me think deeper, not so much about The Minuteman movement or guns and gun culture – but about modern society, and our humanness. For this alone, I think this book well worth reading by anyone, and hopefully they too can step back from the specific subject matter and consider the grander implications of modern society in the USA as well as that strange thing we call “human nature”.

The Minutemen

Briefly, the book chronicles a lengthy period of time Harel spent with the Minutemen. These are people who volunteer to sit at the US-Mexico border, watching for “José” to cross illegally, and work to assist the Border Patrol in their capture.

In the pages of everything from local to international newspapers were photographs of camouflaged men prowling the desert, seemingly a moment away from committing violence. You have probably read these articles and seen these images. The liberal media describes the Minutemen as “sorry-ass gun freaks and sociopaths,” while the conservative media characterizes them as “extraordinary men and women… heroes”. In some accounts these people are patriots; in others, they are lunatics.

One thing is certain, these men and women, whatever their given labels suggest, have come to play an enormous role in our country’s debates about immigration. The problem is that our standard judgements, whether damning them or praising them, sidestep the complex dynamics of who these people are and what they do on the border.

Liberal media accounts suggest that when it comes to immigration, what the Minutemen and their supporters lack is sympathy. If only they understood the plight of the people coming across the border, they would change their minds. But if we are to understand the Minutemen, we need to understand how anger and sympathy can coexist.

Harel writes direct from his experience – he’s the one telling the story. He tells of his experiences: his first arrival, his getting thrown out, his return and initial gaining of trust, the times going out on patrol, sitting in the comms room, and other stories of his experiences with these men and women. He works to analyze and understand why these people do what they do, and become the people they become as a part of this movement.

For example, he tells the tale of Gordon. Gordon was a man without the same background as so many other Minutemen – no military, no law enforcement. Just someone who felt a pull to the movement, had no idea how to participate, but had a burning desire to do so. Then how seeing Gordon over the course of two years, how Gordon grew, how he changed, and how being a Minuteman defined his life and gave him solid purpose.

It becomes very easy to dismiss these people because they are different from you. It’s not a movement you’d join, and it seems a little weird, right? So that must mean these people are weird too. And so, they are dismissed as weirdos and written off.

But what Harel works to do? To find and show their humanness.

Because they are human, just like you.

They want to belong. They want to feel worthwhile. They want to contribute. They want to make a difference. They want to be meaningful.

Just like you.

Sure, the specifics will vary – and they even vary within this grouping. But what I found compelling about Harel’s research – and remember, that Harel is very much an outsider in almost every way – is his desire to understand. Sure, he can’t totally remove his own bias, his own filters, but it’s that very lens that makes the book the worthwhile read. Harel is naive, green, ignorant of this world, with his own preconceived notions. Sure it’s interesting to read the picture painted about The Minutemen, but it’s also worthwhile to watch Harel’s own evolution through this experience.

For me, it was especially interesting to watch because the Harel I met and know is not the same Harel as in the book. So for me, it was neat to see that further backstory to enable me to better understand where Harel is coming from, and where he’s trying to go to with his continued research.

It all boils down to a simple thing: to understanding. Why people are as they are. What makes us human. And you will find that they may not be like you, yet you are more like them than you could ever imagine.

Beyond José

To that, Harel’s latest research (as of this writing) has been published in the March 2018 issue of Qualitative Sociology, entitled “Learning to Need a Gun”. I was a participant in the research, I’ve read his paper, and while sometimes it was a hard read, I felt it was an accurate picture. Hard read? Because there are aspects of modern gun culture that are hard to accept, but to me that just means there’s work ahead towards improving how things are.

If you want to go forward with Harel, I suggest you go backwards a bit. Here’s an interview he did with the UT Sociology department back in 2013 that explains a lot about where he’s coming from.

And for the record, there’s a number of things Harel and I do not agree on. But I’ve found him to be fair and honest, and earnest in his research. I’ve also found that I really enjoy our lunches together. He’s engaging, thought-provoking, and open. I greatly enjoy talking with him, even if we may not agree (what a concept these days, eh?).

I know a lot of people are into the work of David Yamane and his “Gun Culture 2.0” research. Harel and David know each other, and Harel presented at Wake Forest back in 2016. If you dig what David is doing, you should also be following what Harel is doing.

And a great place to start? Reading Harel’s book, “Waiting for José“.

2018-04-13 training log

Not bad.

All in all, things proceeded about at the level I expected for this second week. On the templates, the second week creates a larger jump in intensities. I still am to go 2/fail. I also rated things so there’d be 1 more set per relevant exercise than last week’s session. And so, everything landed about where I would expect it to. Of course slight drop in reps, but relative to last week’s weight, at a level I’d expect (or just above). So all good there. Plus, with the added set it’s more volume than last week. All good.

That said, the biceps pain was there a bit. It didn’t affect the pressing that much, but more the ability to get things in position. For example, getting the DB’s in place for pressing was a little difficult because it needs the biceps for direct involvement to get them in place, then stability to keep them there. That wasn’t too happy, but things did go OK.

I’ve been spending a great deal of time working on things: tennis balls to muscle groups, foam roller, stretching, spending a lot of time to work the arms, delts, upper back. It just takes time. I also have realized my posture has gone into the can again, which I do believe contributes to this problem — the hunch, the rounded forward shoulders, etc.. I may be scheduling some time with a few gym folks to look into things a bit more. My goal isn’t to just manage the pain, but truly figure out where it’s coming from and why, so I can make the appropriate changes to avoid it. I’ve got a lot of data from before-times, and am collecting more now.

All in all tho, today rolled as well as I could expect. I won’t be rating things too high so I can keep volume about the same next week. What’s interesting about next week is the first 2 days go up, but the second two (deadlift day, bench day #2) actually go down — very light weights, and just triples. A small deload.

RP Powerlifting, Strength Cycle, week 2

  • Incline Bench Press
    • bar x 10
    • 135 x 5
    • 175 x 3
    • 205 x 8
    • 205 x 7
    • 205 x 6
  • DB Bench Press
    • 60e x 10
    • 95e x 8
    • 95e x 6
    • 95e x 6
  • Neutral-grip Pulldowns
    • 100 x 10
    • 160 x 10
    • 160 x 9
  • DB Lateral Raises
    • 30e x 10
    • 30e x 10
  • DB Hammer Curls
    • 25e x 10
    • 45e x 8
    • 45e x 8

2018-04-12 training log

Ah deadlifting. How I did miss you.

It does feel good to (conventional) deadlift again. It’s funny tho. My strength here is less than it has been, and on the one token that frustrates me. But if I actually look back over time, I’ve overall progressed in some way. With deadlifts in specific, I think my form/technique is better now than it’s ever been. I’m using that 5-step deadlift setup (see Alan Thrall video), and it’s really worked wonders. If nothing else, it provides me with a consistent approach to setup and the pull, and the bar path feels so much better. So yeah, maybe a step backwards, but overall there’s some sort of forward progression — so I’ll take it.

Just a few notes.

2/fail. Generally 3 minutes rest on deadlifts and squats, 1-2 minutes on everything else.

Back raise. I’m trying to not raise/hinge at my hips and “raise” my back, but rather work as if I’m pushing my hips through the pad. That’s more applicable here.

Pauses felt great. I actually felt like I could crank out more, but it’s 2/fail — reign it in.

Remembered to do calves! 🙂

And as I rate this workout, it’s zeros across the board. Even tho I wouldn’t feel horrible about rating it higher, I want to be more conservative this cycle and not raise the volume too much more.

RP Powerlifting, Strength Cycle, week 2

  • Competition Deadlift
    • 135 x 5
    • 225 x 5
    • 315 x 3
    • 360 x 5
    • 360 x 5
    • 360 x 5
  • 45º Back Raise
    • 20 x 10
    • 20 x 10
    • 20 x 10
  • Pause Squat
    • bar x 5
    • 135 x 5
    • 185 x 3
    • 225 x 5
    • 225 x 5
    • 225 x 5
  • Stair Calves
    • 65 x 10
    • 65 x 10
  • Slant Board Situps
    • 15 x 10
    • 15 x 10

2018-04-10 training log

That biceps pain is returning. Sigh.

It’s been teasing me the past couple weeks, and today it finally kicked in. It wasn’t crippling and didn’t cause me to stop, but it did interfere. First reps might have hurt, and some things – like the upright rows – got cut a little short as a result.

I’m still not 100% sure what causes it, but I am starting to lean towards my arms being in a flexed position for extended periods. Not that I’m flexing my biceps, but rather the elbow joint is in a closed position — like if I’m lying on the bed and looking at my phone for extended periods. I notice sometimes when I do that, it’s the same pain sensation — not actually painful, but the sensation. And then say when I’m squatting how my arms are, bottom position of dumbbell bench pressing, and I feel it. So not 100% sure, but it’s enough to give me pause.

Still, did what I could during the session. Then spent a bunch of time “rolling” the biceps, my front and side delts, and then my usual rolling and stretching.

I’ll see how things pan out.

As for the lifting itself. Still 2/fail. 3 minutes rest on benching, else everything was 2 minutes (or less).

The benching itself feels good, esp. on technique. Of course today felt a little off due to the arm pain, but in general I’m growing happier with my setup and technique here.

RP Powerlifting, Strength Cycle, week 2

  • Competition Grip Bench (with pause)
    • bar x 10
    • 135 x 5
    • 185 x 3
    • 230 x 6
    • 230 x 6
    • 230 x 6
    • 230 x 5
  • Incline DB Press
    • 80e x 10
    • 80e x 10
    • 80e x 8
  • Barbell Bent Rows
    • bar x 10
    • 135 x 5
    • 185 x 8
    • 185 x 8
  • Barbell Upright Row
    • bar x 10
    • 110 x 8
    • 110 x 8
  • Reverse Curls
    • 20 x 10
    • 65 x 8
    • 65 x 8

2018-04-09 training log

Starting week 2.

A similar pattern of progression: a larger jump in weight/intensity, and maybe a jump in sets; stay at 2/fail. To jump in sets is based upon how things went rating the “prior” session, and so far it felt ok so I did go up. But will I go up from here? Sorta. That is, ratings from today will affect Thursday’s deadlifting. I do want that to go up and feel that will be fine. But then rating that deadlift session? Unless there’s something compelling to rate it a +1 or -1, I’ll rate it a 0 so sets of squats are the same next week. I think this workload is good, and I want to try to stick more to the “do as little as possible that still gets you the desired results” approach. Why do more work if it doesn’t help me gain or only risks causing decline (or stagnation)?

I also am looking at this cycle as just priming the pump a bit. I’ve been away from such work that some numbers are a guess. But also, my body isn’t quite primed to do this sort of work. So how much is the gain here truly getting stronger vs. my body just remembering how to lift this way. Take that the way the template is set up, you provide the template with your 5RM in squats then it figures out of the 5 weeks. Today, week 2, should be lifting that 5RM – but then stopping 2/fail. So in theory I should be hitting 3 reps for however many sets. But I hit 5. Did I undershoot? Am I stronger? is my body simply remembering?

This is why my plan is to run the cycle once, then run the cycle again. I reckon at least 2 runs should be a better indicator, with run 2 hopefully being truly more productive. What to do after that second run? Don’t know. I want to see how things go. Might do it a third time, might do a peaking, might a powerlifting-hypertrophy. Don’t know, too soon to tell.

Anyways, things today felt generally good. Squat itself felt good. Tight is the cue.

Front squats felt a little funky for me, because with the belt on it causes something in my glutes to twinge a bit. But I’m working on stretching and rolling that area more, and also just “working through it” so that my body can improve vs. always avoiding it and the body never does. So the first rep might be a little annoying, maybe shaves depth by an inch, but then things feel better and the subsequent reps hit depth and things just fine. Just something to continue to work through.

I did remember to do calves this week! Again, not trying to do anything massive here, just something to keep my feet and calves happy for overall health improvement.

Anyways, a nice start to week 2!

RP Powerlifting, Strength Cycle, week 2

  • Squat (low bar)
    • bar x 10
    • 135 x 5
    • 225 x 5
    • 255 x 3
    • 285 x 5
    • 285 x 5
    • 285 x 4
    • 285 x 4
  • Front Squat
    • 170 x 7
    • 170 x 7
    • 170 x 7
  • Competition Deadlift
    • 135 x 3
    • 225 x 3
    • 270 x 3
    • 270 x 3
    • 270 x 3
  • Stair Calves
    • 65 x 10
    • 65 x 10
  • Reaching Situps
    • 20 x 10
    • 20 x 10

Sunday Metal – Slayer

Back to more live Slayer. This claims to be the first show ever filmed, March 3, 1983 — even before “Show No Mercy” came out.

Note there’s one song about half-way through that Tom introduces as “Blitzkrieg”. Looks like they kept the song but changed the name to “Final Command”.

It’s also really strange to see Slayer playing to a dead crowd and almost empty theater. 🙂

 

2018-04-06 training log

A nice end to the first week on the RP powerlifting-strength template.

I am really happy to be back doing this. This is the style of lifting I love. I’m kinda unhappy at feeling so weak and being relatively in the same strength rut I’ve been in for so long, but I must acknowledge all the detours were necessary and good. I know I’m smarter, and hopefully after running this template for a bit and seeing what I can get from it I’ll be in a better position to try my own programming again. My plan is to run this template this cycle, run it a second time (likely with little to no change in the movements, just up the weight slightly), then run the RP powerlifting-peaking template. See how all that goes, then assess.

Today was just another good pressing day. It helps to keep in the work so the adaptation curves work out well. It’s not a ton of volume so there’s sufficient room for recovery. I do feel weird only doing 2 sets, but that will change next week. Next week remains at 2/fail, but the intensities go up as do some of the sets.

I do feel like things are dialed in well enough, so next week should be interesting to see how goes.

I’m also thankful for the shorter gym sessions. It lets me spend a good 10-15 minutes afterwards foam rolling and stretching (vs. a 2.5 hour session and I gotta rush home to get to work). My body is feeling a lot better.

RP Powerlifting, Strength Cycle, week 1

  • Incline Bench Press
    • bar x 10
    • 135 x 5
    • 175 x 3
    • 195 x 9
    • 195 x 9
  • DB Bench Press
    • 60e x 10
    • 90e x 10
    • 90e x 8
  • Neutral-grip Pulldowns
    • 120 x 10
    • 150 x 10
    • 150 x 8
  • DB Lateral Raises
    • 30e x 10
    • 30e x 10
  • DB Hammer Curls
    • 25e x 10
    • 45e x 8
    • 45e x 7

2018-04-05 training log

It feels good to be deadlifting again.

For the longest time the deadlift was my favorite lift. I still enjoy it a great deal, so it felt good to do it again. I’m of course a bit saddened by where my strength is — but this is the tradeoff I’ve had as I’ve detoured to pursue other things. I have to remember it’s a long game, and it’s more about preserving my health than achieving numbers — but I still want the numbers. 😉

Today wasn’t too intensive, per the templates. Stopped well short at 2/fail, which is tough when you want to do more. I am also going to work double-overhand grip as long as I can. I think the gym has a deadlift bar, but I’m not going to use it — there’s an Ohio bar, which has been my preference as of late for everything.

Pause squats felt good to do again as well. I really like doing them and wanted to do more sets – but alas, all programming today is 2 sets. Again, I do want to try to be conservative on my ratings so I don’t blow up into ridiculous amounts of volume. But still, more than 2 sets please.

Oh, and I again forgot to do calf work. I’ll be sure to pick this up next week.

Anyways, good day. Good start to the cycle.

RP Powerlifting, Strength Cycle, week 1

  • Competition Deadlift
    • 135 x 5
    • 225 x 5
    • 315 x 3
    • 345 x 6
    • 345 x 6
  • 45º Back Raise
    • BW+5 x 10
    • BW+5 x 10
  • Pause Squat
    • bar x 5
    • 135 x 5
    • 185 x 3
    • 215 x 6
    • 215 x 6
  • Slant Board Situps
    • BW+15 x 10
    • BW+15 x 10