Follow through and recovery

Karl pointed me to this great article by Tom Givens: Follow Through and Recovery: The Often Neglected Fundamentals. One of the best parts about the article is a great graphic they did on the shooting cycle. Click and read and look.

All too often what happens is someone shoots, and the moment the gun goes *bang* the follow-up motion is to drop the gun and cran their head over to try to see if they hit it.

That’s not right.

Gun goes bang, and you need to watch the front sight lift (which implies you were watching the front sight before the shot), gun recoils, you reset the trigger, gun comes down out of recoil, you reacquire the sight picture. That’s follow-through.

The hole in your target will be there 5 seconds from now, 5 weeks from now, 5 years from now. You don’t need to immediately determine if you hit or not; you can and should wait to make that determination. Follow through, recover, be prepared for the next shot. After all is done, THEN you can lower or reholster the gun and check your target.

What’s even better? If you keep watching that front sight, there will come in a time in your shooting when you’ll actually see the front sight lift up and out of the rear notch. When you can start doing this, you won’t need to look at your target. The moment the shot breaks you’ll already know.

Here’s a good video that USPSA GM Roy Stedman made to explain the concept:

 

Randi Rogers @ TGR

Randi Rogers is now a contributing author over at Tactical Gun Review!

If you don’t know who Randi Rogers is, if you don’t know who TGR is, then click and find out.

Very exciting stuff. Keep up the good work, Charles and Mike. TGR is growing well.

Miscellaneous thoughts on dry fire

I cannot deny the glory of dry fire practice. It really does pay off.

Getting the new M&P, I really ramped up my dry fire practice because I wanted to adjust to the new gun, help break in the trigger, and so on. So I’ve done a lot more dry fire recently than I have in a long time. I strive to do it every day, but some days life has other plans. Nevertheless, it’s been paying off quite nicely. I need to change up my routine tho to focus on some weak spots.

Try to dry fire 10 minutes every day instead of 1 hour a week. You’ll get more out of it. Plus, the skills will be fresher in your mind and body. I forget exactly how Tom Givens put it, but your skills matter more about proximity to the last time you practiced. So if you practice say 3x a week, you’re never more than a couple of days away from the last time you practiced. Whereas a marathon practice session once a month, you could be 30 days away from the last time you practiced, and that’s not going to carry you when it’s time to perform.

When you dry fire, focus on being correct. You’re working to ingrain good habits, so you have to strive to make every repetition a correct repetition.

Slow down. It helps you do things correctly.

One thing dry fire lacks is recoil. Because there’s no “force to fight against”, one thing we can get lax on is our grip. Don’t. Make a conscious effort to ensure your grip is using proper technique AND grip pressure. If dry fire is all about building lots of repetitions so it becomes “automatic” when we’re really shooting, then ensuring proper grip is an important part of successful dry fire.

Vary your routine, else it gets boring. There are tons of good resources out there. Look at Steve Anderson’s book, Refinement & Repetition, Dry Fire Drills for Dramatic Improvement. I listed a bunch of others in a prior article.

Most of all, just make a conscious commitment to dry fire. I guarantee if you have a good and focused practice routine and do it 10-15 minutes every day for a month, you’ll see an improvement in your skills.

Work on the things you suck at. Yes, that means more weak-hand-only for all of us. 🙂

M&P, shooting drills

It’s now been 2 weeks of carrying the M&P9 and it’s more and more comfortable every day.

As I mentioned previously, I’ve wanted to do more shooting drills with it because I just haven’t. It’s been most “utility” shooting and steel shooting.

So this past Saturday while out at KRT I shot some drills.

The first drill I shot was Karl’s “3 Seconds or Less” drill. No major problems in shooting the drill, tho weak-hand-only shooting still needs work. More on this later.

The second drill I shot wasn’t a drill per se, but was Paul Howe’s set of Pistol Instructor standards. I couldn’t shoot #9 since I didn’t have a rifle to transition from. I also forgot to do #10 because of other things going on at the range.

In general tho, all things went well. Shot well, time to spare. All is good… except weak hand.

I’ve been doing a LOT of dry fire lately. Ever since I got the M&P I’ve been striving to dry fire every day, and it’s paying off. But I can see where my dry fire has been helping and where it hasn’t. I say hasn’t because I’ve been focusing a lot on trigger press and sights, not so much on the draw and present. Some presentation, but not from draw nor under time pressure. In general I was fine, but it showed up worst with weak-hand-only. Timer goes off, I didn’t get a good grip, didn’t get the press-out well enough, and then yanked the trigger since my grip sucked. Conversely, we were over on the steel range shooting at the small hostage target plate some 20-ish yards away. First thing in the morning Tom challenged me to shoot it weak-hand-only cold. Nailed it. 🙂  Then that morning and then during the break between classes we did more, and I was shooting alright… not 100% but certainly far better than I have. But it was all slow “take your time” shots (e.g. take 3-5 seconds to get the shot off). Of course that’s alright, but when I put the pressure of the timer on me I wasn’t getting the grip firm and consequently blowing the shots. *sigh*

And so, I see what I need to work on. Not just weak hand, but weak-hand under pressure.

Unfortunately I didn’t get to shoot much more because other things were happening on the other range that were quite interesting, and I got pulled over into that. Thus I didn’t get to shoot more drills (tho I did shoot more steel, both the slow weak-hand-only and then a bunch of two-handed fast), nor shoot on paper to see how she was grouping and how POI vs POA was faring. But I’m not sweating it too much because overall everything appears to be going where I told it to go: it’s more geeky minutia interest that I have in wanting to know that information. Oh and Karl… sorry… in getting distracted I totally forgot to take down my targets.

I really like this gun. I would say I shoot it just a hair better than my XD-9.

Two classes, and what a good day it was

This past Saturday was a slightly different day at KR Training.

1. We held 2 Basic Pistol 1 classes. It’s common to have 2 classes in 1 day, but always different classes. We ran 2 of the same.

2. Karl Rehn (the “KR” in KR Training) wasn’t there.

Why the difference? The Rangemaster Polite Society Annual Tactical Conference was being held that weekend, so Karl was off presenting at the conference. However, demand for classes, especially Basic Pistol 1, has been extremely high. We’ve run a lot of BP1’s, it’s a pretty well-oiled machine. John (TXGunGeek), Tom, and I have things down pretty well, and we were joined by misBehavin (Mrs. TXGunGeek), the suburban dad, and Ed (the “intern”). So we took over the reigns for the day and introduced 20 new students to the world of firearms.

High number of women in the class, well over half; a fantastic thing to see. And as usual, the demographics spread from young to old, across all sorts of bounds. Sorry, but I think the only pigeonholing you can do here is people taking responsibility for themselves. I will say tho, I’m seeing more and more young women showing up in classes. I can hypothesize a number of reasons; it’s an interesting data point.

All in all, classes ran well. TXGunGeek said it best, that what’s so satisfying about these Basic classes is that “new shooter smile”. That first time they shoot, and the HUGE smile that comes over their face. I’d have to agree that while some of the “high speed low drag” classes are a lot of fun, the Basic classes are some of the most satisfying both professionally and personally.

I also enjoyed the classes because I got to do a little more direct teaching. The nature of most classes, Karl runs the show and we’re assisting. I have zero problem with that, and that’s of course how it should be. But it is nice from time to time to get to demo and show stuff. I handled the technique portion of the classes (grip, stance, trigger press, follow through, etc.), and enjoyed it. Got to play with a SIRT pistol (on loan) a little bit and I can see how it could be useful… just have to find the right places to work it in.

Students were good, asking questions, open and receptive to learning. They all seemed to enjoy themselves — lots of smiles. 🙂

And that… makes it all worth it.

A more effective tool

Technology is a wonderful thing, especially when it advances. If we go back to early man, he did things with his hands but eventually came to realize the limits of what his hands could do. But through daily living he came to discover implements could overcome the limits. He might have discovered pounding with a stick was more effective at breaking something open. He may have then discovered a rock was more effective. Tie the rock to the stick, and now with that additional leverage you’ve got an even more effective tool. And so on.

We don’t write on animal skins, or cave walls, or clay tablets. No, we’ve gone through the printing press, typewriters, and now we have iPad’s from which to publish our blogs on the Internet. Advances in technology generally bring about better things and a higher quality of life.

So when it comes to life, we’ve also managed to come up with better ways to protect ours. Again, the stick and the rock. Eventually you might find that a sling helps you better throw the rock. Metals and metalwork were discovered and through bronze and iron and eventually steel we came up with better means to hunt and protect ourselves and our state. Of course, gunpowder changed the entire landscape.

And as any technology evolves, eventually that which was replaced does fade away. Oh sure, it’s still around usually for historical or educational reasons, but practically speaking we don’t send clay tablets by pony express any more. Heck, even the US Postal Service is fading away. We no longer arm our armies with bows and swords because more effective tools have been developed. Technology progresses.

We carry firearms because, so far, nothing better has come along to replace them. We have yet to invent a better tool for the job. All we’ve been doing for the past few hundred years with firearms is refining and improving, but the general concepts remain the same. Still, folks try to find more effective tools.

Such as a taser.

The reality is, a taser isn’t that effective of a tool. Case in point:

A crazed knifeman was shot up to four times by armed police officers after Taser stun guns failed to incapacitate him.

The man, aged in his 20s, was fighting for his life in hospital last night after receiving  multiple gunshot wounds.

He was injured as he brandished a large knife or sword at a group of officers.

[…]

Local officers were the first to arrive at the scene but they  were forced to retreat and  call in armed colleagues when the man threatened them with a weapon.

Police followed the man and another confrontation took place in a neighbouring street, during which a 50,000-volt stun gun was discharged and shots fired.

First they tried nothing — because they had nothing — so all they could do was retreat. They were fortunate to be able to call in reinforcements… with guns. They didn’t call in for police with knives, no, they wanted a better tool. They wanted a better means to end the situation as quickly as possible with as minimal harm and impact to the neighborhood and citizens as possible. A gun.

But they tried a taser, and it didn’t work. So they had to go to something stronger, something more effective.

A taser has a place, but not for private citizens. It’s effective in police work when you have many armed friends right behind you. Tasers are good towards working to gain compliance, so that the VCA can be taken to the ground and a bevy of armed police swarm him to secure him. If the taser doesn’t work, again, there’s a bevy of armed back-up to help manage the situation.

But you, the private citizen? You don’t have backup. You don’t need to gain compliance, you need the situation to stop. You want to get away. A taser might help you here, but gee… it’s a single shot tool, it’s easy to miss under stress and pressure, it may not work, you have to get somewhat close to your attacker to use it. I just don’t see how it’s an effective tool for a private citizen.

There are more effective tools. This is why the gun has yet to be replaced.

 

Hornady Product Recall

Just got an email from Hornady about a product recall.

Hornady® Manufacturing announced the recall of seven lots of 500 S&W 300 gr. FTX® Custom™ pistol ammunition. Hornady ballisticians have determined that some cartridges from Lot numbers 3101327, 3110256, 3110683, 3110695, 3110945, 3111388, 3111885, may exhibit excessive chamber pressures. Use of this product may result in firearm damage and/or personal injury.

You can find full information on Hornady’s website.

The only smoke and thunder they have is coming out their mouth

The latest brouhaha in the gun blogger world is over a website called “Smoke and Thunder”. No, I’m not going to bother linking to it.

But I will link to some useful stories about it. Here’s Unc’s first post, Unc’s follow up, which links to Linoge’s write up, and Miguel’s too which is frankly the best if you read through all the comments.

I have no idea if they used my identity. I don’t run in the “top gun-blogger personalities” circle so probably not (tho I am protective of my “hsoi” trademark). But the whole concept of this is just bothersome.

First, they don’t understand “fair use”. I’ve found that when someone tosses around “fair use”, especially as something to hide behind, that’s demonstration they don’t understand the concept.

But let’s set aside the legal questions. Let’s just look at what they’re doing.

They’re being dicks.

Look at the postings on their own site. Look at the comments they left on Miguel’s site. Their attitude is that if you don’t like what we’re doing, then YOU are the asshole for not allowing them to piggy-back off what you’ve built (e.g. the name, likeness, and thus reputation of folks like Oleg Volk, Tam, Breda, Unc, Caleb Giddings, and so on). Their handling, their “public relations” skills really leave something to be desired.

So you have to wonder… are they just assholes? are they just stupid? Or is there something uglier going on? Who knows.

And really… who cares.

We’re feeding the troll by caring. All this bad press, it’s still press. They’re happy to get it.

So no, I don’t and won’t have any affiliation with them. The only group I tend to be prejudiced against are assholes, and I have better things to do with my life and time. Hopefully this will be the first and the last I have to say on the subject.

Tyler Kee (TTAG) visits KR Training

(argh, I hate it when WordPress eats my posts)

Tyler Kee, a writer over at The Truth About Guns, took part in a recent KR Training class.

Read his review/AAR here.

With bonus picture of a tall ugly guy.

Tyler, thank you for the kind words. It was a pleasure to have you out. You were a good student and did well. When you come back out for Defensive Pistol Skills 2, I’m sure you’ll do just fine with the pre-class pop quiz. 🙂  Just remember: slow down, get acceptable hits.