Some years ago I wrote down my thoughts on home defense tools.
My thoughts have progressed over the years.
The other day I read this article: Long guns for home defense – not such a hot idea. My initial reaction was to groan, because there actually is a place for them, but my groan was purely on the article title. So I went and read the article, and I actually agree completely with the author.
(Aside: This is why it’s good to actually READ the article, not just the headline. I loved NPR’s troll/experiment on this very thing.)
But since I know from looking at my own site statistics that people rarely click-through to read the referenced article, here’s the “tl;dr” summary:
- Handguns are generally better for home-defense because they are compact and one-handed
- Have you tried quickly navigating your house with a long-gun?
- How about contending with opening doors, using flashlights, finagling children, etc.?
- Long-guns are useful when you stay-put.
Now is this the be-all-end-all? Of course not. There are a great many factors to consider. For example, I know a couple (and just the 2 of them; no kids to worry about) that lives in a rural area. They are far back from the road so there’s longer distances to cover. As well, a more common issue for them is to contend with 4-legged predators around their livestock. Considering the totality of their circumstances, a rifle actually works out well for them.
In my house, a handgun is generally more useful, because people, because tight and twisty hallways, and most of all? Because it’s the tool with which I am most proficient.
And I’m sure YOUR situation is different.
Consider the totality of your circumstance and pick the right tool for the job. I know Internet mantra is “long guns for defending the home-front”, but remember what’s right for someone else behind their keyboard may not be appropriate for you, your family, and your home.
SBR.
Agreed that would be better than non-SBR-length long guns. But it’s still not as maneuverable as a handgun.
I’ve even got one particular situation in mind where I know for a fact any sort of long gun (even a shorter long gun) likely would have been more hindrance than help.
But again, blanket statements all around. In the end it’s all about picking the right tool for the circumstance.
Handguns for me as well (long guns in the safe in the basement).
However, I read this article and it has me thinking about it.
http://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/shotguns/
Oh, I have no qualms about a good shotgun. My only beef is their length, unless you go through all the trouble for the tax stamp. 18.5″ barrels, then even if you cut the stock down a little bit (which I did after taking some Defensive Shotgun classes with Tom Givens; shoulders better with about a 13″ LOP for me), it’s still mighty long. So it gets back to that whole mobility thing.
. . . and that was a thoughtful and well-researched NPR article. It took me a while to get through it all, but well worth the half hour. I may actually have to pay them more attention, even though I don’t normally read newspapers.
You know it….
Handgun for me, M1 carbine for the wife.
It’s easier for her to manipulate a rifle than a handgun, and she is more of a ‘bunker down and call 911’ type.
Handgun for me, since I am more proficient with a handgun and it’s easier to manipulate with a flashlight and set of keys in our 6 bed/4 bath two story house.
There you go: that’s another strong consideration — who is going to operate it.
My thoughts echo some of yours and can be found here:
https://civiliangunfighter.wordpress.com/2015/07/18/a-few-perspectives-on-home-defense/
In the end, the gun you have on you will be your primary. Since I rarely stroll through my house with a slung carbine or shotgun, the pistol is my de facto primary.