2016-06-06 training log

Nothing like matching your lifetime PR on a lift you haven’t done in a year.

I haven’t done the Press (overhead press, standing press, military press — whatever you want to call it; I’m using Mark Rippetoe’s definition of “Press”) in about a year. I’ve pressed overhead in other forms here and there, but there’s something cool and different about Pressing.

I have no idea where I am with it, so my thought was to just go in and work up to a true max and find out. I knew my all time best was 165, so with that in mind and a desire to still do the 5/4/3/2/1 work-up-rep-scheme I figured start with the empty bar, then 20# jumps followed by singles should be just fine for spacing. Two minutes rest between sets, and let’s just see where it goes.

When 125 went up easily I knew I’d do more. 145 was a little shakey — mostly I could feel that my form was really rusty, but strength was fine. I started to think I should just do 155 but nah — what have I got to lose? I felt the strength margin was still there, just rusty form. Sure enough, the 165 went up mostly fine: again, I my form wavered because I’m rusty, but it was mostly a matter of groove and balance. I did remember the most important thing was to be tight from head to toe. Truly everything. The quads are locked, my butt is clenched hard, I’m squeezing the hell out of the bar (trying to make the bar ooze out from between my fingers), and just tight tight tight. Then explode the weight up. And sure enough it was ok. Again, I have that groove issue with my breathing and Valsalva on the Press, and that came out hard on the 165 — thus I wavered a bit. But it never went down, kept pressing, and boom.

So, it’s cool to tie your lifetime PR on a lift you haven’t done in ages. I looked back at my records and I set that PR back in 2013!! Anything since has been somewhat of decline, due to the Defattening. It’s been really interesting to observe how throughout Defattening my leg strength has vanished but my upper-body strength has increased slightly. Not sure what to make of that, but here we are.

Anyways, that went well. Very happy there.

Dips were dips. I keep reminding myself how not too long ago I couldn’t do 1, but here I am cranking out 25 reps. I did note some work in my chest but not much pump — but I got a lot of pump in my triceps. Something to file away.

I was supposed to do chin-ups (supinated grip), but that’s just a lot of torque on my joints. I’ve been wanting to go back to the close, neutral-grip “v-bar” pullups for a while, so sure why not. I did them from a dead hang and man, that was enlightening. There’s a lot more mid-back work here because there’s a lot more scapular retraction than during say normal pull-/chin-ups (or pulldowns). I didn’t get as many reps, so I did more sets (still 350-Method style); still not 350-rep ranges, but it was good work for what I can do.

DB Rows continue to manifest to me that while I may not care for DB work as much as BB work, DB’s put me through a range of motion and give my muscles work I can’t get any other way. It is good work for me.

But this also makes me feel like this GMM program doesn’t quite give me the volume I need — but I have to temper that. Yes, per session it’s not a lot of work, but over the weeks how does it add up? We’ll see.

Finally, instead of plain DB curls I did them as hammer curls, across the body, alternating. It’s something I got from Joh Meadows — across the body, does it do anything? It did feel a little less stressful on my joints, and I did find I got a good brachialis pump. I think I could get more out of this if 1. I picked a heavier weight (called it bad), 2. gave a really good squeeze at the top.

Anyways, all in all a fine day. Really happy about the Press.

Based on Paul Carter’s “Guaranteed Muscle Mass” article.

  • Overhead Press
    • bar x 5
    • 65 x 5
    • 85 x 4
    • 105 x 3
    • 125 x 2
    • 145 x 1
    • 165 x 1
    • 125 x 8 (AMRAP)
    • 125 x 4 (50%)
  • Dips (350 Method)
    • BW x 15
    • BW x 11
    • BW x 9
  • V-Bar Pull-Ups
    • BW x 5
    • BW x 5
    • BW x 3
    • BW x 3
    • BW x 3
    • BW x 3
  • DB Rows (350 Method)
    • 55 x 22
    • 55 x 15
    • 55 x 11
  • Alternating, cross-body Hammer Curls (350 Method)
    • 15e x 40
    • 15e x 20
    • 15e x 20

3 Tips for Success

The following might be about bodybuilding — but it really isn’t:

About 6 years ago I interviewed John Meadows for an article I was writing. One of the questions was “If you could give some advice to the newer generation of bodybuilders, what would it be?”

Here are his answers:

1. The ever elusive search for the “secret”. Everybody thinks there is a magic pill, or magic protein, or magic workout. Here is the truth. You have to work hard at training and your diet, and above all, you have to be consistent. I never ever miss meals, and I didn’t miss a workout for…well, I can’t remember the last time I said to myself “I am just not gonna go in today.” Not part of mental psyche. If you start making excuses, you are done. You will do it more and more, as it gets easier to just brush things off. I have seen it hundreds of times. Now there are genetic freaks out there, that can get by with less, but I am speaking to the vast majority here. Stay disciplined, and be consistent, and guess what…this whole thing will be more fun too. You know why, because nothing is as fun and motivating as making progress.

2. Second, make it a point to seek out those who know more than you, and learn from them. Do that. Don’t sit there and spin your wheels when there are smart people out there who can help you get better. I have had a mentor or two for the last 19 years. Right now it’s Dr. Serrano, and will probably be for a long time, because he has forgotten more than I will ever know.

3. Lastly, don’t get dogmatic in your views. Don’t be its “my way or the highway” 100% of the time. I have news for you, you don’t know everything. I don’t, Shelby doesn’t, and you don’t. If you fall into that trap, learning will cease, and your progress will slow to a halt as well.

That comes from a Facebook posting by Shelby Starnes

So in short:

  1. There’s no magic/secret. It’s just hard work, consistent work, disciplined work.
  2. Seek out those who know more than you and learn from them.
  3. Don’t be dogmatic

And I’d add to #3, see #2.

This isn’t just about bodybuilding, this is about anything and everything in life that you want to be successful in.

2016-06-03 training log

Yeah, this is seeming about right.

Still sore today from Monday’s killer leg session, but workable. In fact, felt better to move around under some load. So yeah, hopefully this every 4-5 days spead of an A/B 3x/week rotation will be just right. Especially when you consider the intensity and perceived intensities are up there due to things like 350-Method.

Today was a little weird tho.

Something happened during front squats — I can’t say what, but it made things unstable for me. Sometimes this happens — something with the belt, how it causes some nerve down the back of my legs to be unhappy, and so when I get down in the hole things aren’t happy. It’s part of why I can’t do things like lay on my back and “flutter kick”. Ah well. All in all it was ok, just a little odd.

That said, I continue to work on my front squat form, keeping chest high, dropping straight down, etc..

The AMRAP set didn’t go as long as I wanted too, as it was my upper body that peeded out before my legs did. Still, that’s kinda the beauty of AMRAP+50%, because it’s 2 sets to push yourself. I did feel better on this than before, so things are improving, but still some ways to go.

Leg presses peeded out sooner than expected. I realized why: that first set went really slow because things are still a little tight and sore (esp. adductors). So with the eccentric going so slow that was a lot more TUT and boom — less reps. But it got me thinking that I may want to go that route — not some sort of 4-0-1-0 type of tempo or anything, but just putting a little more into the eccentric on the leg presses to mimic my squat tempo a little more.

And finally lunges. I’m going to try to change my mentality towards things like lunges, split squats, etc.. I keep saying how much I “hate” them. Well, I really do not like them, but I know they are beneficial for me in many ways, which is why I keep doing them. I’m just going to focus on the benefits and work to get away from the negative mentality. It’s a small thing, but it matters.

Oh… and while I’m enjoying the massing diet, I’m getting a little more bloated than I care for. Gotta watch that.

Music: Clutch – “Psychic Warfare”, “Earth Rocker”, and a few other random songs to finish me out.

Based on Paul Carter’s Guaranteed Muscle Mass” article.

  • Front Squat
    • bar x 5
    • bar x 5
    • 115 x 5
    • 135 x 4
    • 165 x 3
    • 195 x 2
    • 225 x 1
    • 165 x 10 (AMRAP)
    • 165 X 7 (50%)
  • Leg Press (350-method)
    • 225 x 17
    • 225 x 17
    • 225 x 14
  • Lunge
    • BW X 10e
    • BW X 10e
    • BW X 10e
    • BW X 10e
    • BW X 10e

Why consult experts when an echo chamber will do

When you want to talk about global warming, the first people you go to are climate-change deniers, right?

When you want to talk about the rights of LGBT or racial minorities, you get your local Grand Wizard, right?

Right?

Of course not. Well, of course not if you want to be taken seriously and have a proper conversation on the topic. Right?

When the University of Texas laid out their “campus carry rules”, one stand-out was a requirement to carry without a round in the chamber.

This is profoundly stupid.

Don’t take my word for it. Here’s what 4 experts have to say on the matter, including our own Karl Rehn of KR Training, and the legendary Bill Rogers and John Farnam:

UT Alumnus Karl Rehn concurs, stating, “In the most likely scenario, those that want to carry at UT are going to arrive on campus with a round chambered and will have to handle their gun, most likely in the awkward, cramped space inside their vehicle, to un-chamber the round and reholster before leaving the vehicle. That’s a far more likely scenario for a negligent discharge than someone simply unholstering and putting the gun in a storage locker—and the working group has already rejected that idea as ‘too dangerous.’”

UT keeps talking about “safety”, yet this requirement works against that very desire on many levels.

“The weight of the deliberation was that we were going to go on the side of safety, as opposed to having the tactical advantage of having loaded weapons on campus,” [UT President Gregory] Fenves said.

[Full Story]

That’s fine. You can poo-poo all the “tactical” reasoning as to why empty-chamber carry is a bad idea. Like I said, there are many reasons why empty-chamber is a bad idea, and in this discussion we can discard most of them in favor of just looking at what UT itself claims to want, which is safety. Fenves said it right there: they want safety above all things.

So tell me how forcing people to handle their guns leads to greater safety? This is as opposed to leaving your gun holstered and not touching it at all? Please answer the question. Please articulate how this is better, safer.

The thing is, UT didn’t consult any experts.

Asked later to point to which experts the school relied upon, spokesman Gary Susswein declined to do so.

He said the working group “did not formally hear from outside experts,” but that members spoke individually with law enforcement officials and others. He noted that the method “mirrors the policy used by the Israeli military.”

And he added that working group members with military experience “also used this approach at various times during their service.”

If they had gone to any actual industry experts, they’d be parading them around because it would certainly deflect the criticism. In fact, they flat out admit they didn’t hear from any outside experts – just anecdotal evidence. And frankly, if you know anything about those “sources”, you know they are questionable. This is akin to saying that I spend some time looking at the sky and reading weather.com, so I can speak to climate change.

But I know why such groups never consult with true experts: because they’d hear things they don’t want to hear.

You’d expect such intellectual dishonesty from Fox News or MSNBC. Not so much from a supposed institution of higher learning. And even worse when policy, rules, and/or laws are being made.

You are welcome to hate guns all you want. You are welcome to crusade for their banishment from the face of this Earth. But at least be intellectually honest about it, else you’re just a shyster and deserving of no respect.

2016-06-01 training log

I’m so damn sore. Split squats, I hate you. 🙂

Frankly tho, that I’m still so sore I think is a fair sign that it was a good change, disrupting, and should lead to some growth. What will be more interesting will be to see how sore I feel tomorrow then Friday. Why? Matter of recovery: tomorrow would be indicative of 4x/week and Friday 3x/week sessions. If I’m not recovered well enough by tomorrow, then yeah — I think 3x/week works out better for me. I’m pretty convinced that’s my better modality, so we’ll see.

I also am liking 3x/week because that’s more days to sleep in. I’m a little mixed on it tho, because again it was pretty evident how my conditioning has gone to crap. Even just 30-60 minutes of slow steady cardio helps with conditioning, and part of me wants to do it to get that back. But sweet sweet sleep….

Anyways, as for today, it went pretty well. I did overestimate the weights for my 350-sets, so I would drop the weight as I went along to ensure I got enough reps in. But overall things went well. I have to remember that while it’s not a lot of sets on paper, those 350-sets are 3 high-rep sets to failure, which is a lot of work that will add up. No question that while I didn’t feel that “worked” by the end, I certainly was worked enough.

So anyways, jury’s still out, but so far I’m enjoying.

Bench press – I was surprised to get 15 reps with 185; could have gotten 1-2 more. On paper that says I have a 1RM around 275, but I don’t believe that — maybe the muscle is there, but I don’t have the movement patterns down to recruit everything for a 1RM like that. Still, I find it interesting how my bench keeps going up, even if slowly; whereas I keep struggling to get my squat back up. It makes me wonder if maybe I do this for a bit, a brief strength cycle, then maybe instead of doing any sort of specific programming I spend a few weeks just squatting a lot, not so much to work things but more to explore and experiment and see where and what I can discover — a few weeks of investment and “study” to see what sort of longer term gains I can get.

Based on Paul Carter’s “Guaranteed Muscle Mass” article.

  • Bench Press
    • bar x 10
    • 135 x 5
    • 155 x 4
    • 185 x 3
    • 205 x 2
    • 225 x 1
    • 185 x 15 (AMRAP)
    • 185 x 7 (50%)
  • Incline Press (350 Method)
    • 115 x 15
    • 95 x 13
    • 95 x 10
  • BB Row
    • 155 x 8
    • 155 x 8
    • 115 x 12
    • 115 x 11
  • Narrow, neutral-grip Pulldown (350 Method)
    • 100 x 15
    • 90 x 12
    • 80 x 15
  • BB Curl (350 Method)
    • 40 x 22
    • 40 x 15
    • 40 x 12

I don’t know what to think

I’m on Nextdoor and yesterday afternoon I get an urgent alert that some kid tried to break into a neighbor’s home around 4:00 PM — she was home, and kid just walked up to the back door and tried to come in. He ran off because he was discovered. Description seemed familiar to other neighbors, so he’s probably been the one responsible for some stuff lately — hopefully he’ll get caught.

And yes, it’s a good argument for putting padlocks on your fence gates.

We’ve had a rash of mailbox break-ins.

Cars have been rummaged through.

Now I read that a Walgreens was robbed at gunpoint about 10:30 last night. Apparently a dude matching the same description went to the Walgreens near my house, demanded drugs at the pharmacy; didn’t get the full information on what happened there tho.

There’s been other shit going on too, all around Austin. Just open your eyes a little bit, because your neighborhood is getting nailed too.

And not all of it is getting reported on the news. Check out Krimelabb, Austin Police Department CrimeViewer, SpotCrime, and even NextDoor is quite useful.

Shit’s bad, folks.

If nothing else, get your head out of the sand about the reality of the world we live in. That’s the first step towards keeping yourself safe and being able to do something about it.

2016-05-30 training log

Man, it felt good to be back in the gym after about 2 weeks of essentially no gym.

I had a week being down with strep throat (or something like that), then I was out of town on business. Between the two I was just run down, tired, and in no real shape or mood to work out. Sure I tried a little bit, but rest and recovery was more important. And that I think is a theme as I go forward.

Right up until last night I was undecided as to where to go next. I have a basic idea of course. I want to run a little more hypertrophy for a while. Yeah, I have my strength goals, but I’ve honestly shifted a bit towards wanting to build some muscle. First, more muscle will be good for more strength. Second, after all I’ve lost over the past almost-2-years of loss-dieting, I’d like to rebuild some stuff. Because honestly, I’m enjoying the way things look in the mirror and I’d like to build on that a little bit. Third, the more I read, the more it seems right to cycle things — if you focus mainly on strength, do a hypertrophy cycle every so often; if you focus mainly on hypertrophy, do a strength cycle every so often. It breaks adaptation cycles, solidifies gains, and allows longer-term progress. So it’s been my goal to do one more hypertrophy cycle, then do a short strength cycle, then see from there.

Question was: what to do for hypertrophy for the next 6-8 weeks? I had thought about just another 4x/week bodypart split hitting each major group 1x week. That certainly works OK for me, especially with the setup I’ve been running. But there’s more than enough out there, both literature and my own experience, that tells me hitting a part more often than once every 7 days should actually be better for me. Granted, if I hit it hard enough to require 7 days for recovery, that works out — and I tend to like how those sessions go. When I hit things more often, the sessions need to be lesser so that the cumulative work is what I need, but then each session is a little less than I want. That’s a little hard for me to pull back to do, but if it amounts to better results in the end…

I’ve long been thinking about it, a sort of A/B upper/lower split type of thing. But I wasn’t sure how I wanted to do it. Biggest thing was days. I’ve been on 4x/week because of The Defattening, and while I enjoy the groove of 4x and find that can work alright when I do something like a bodypart split because let’s face it: having an arm day is basically a rest day (compared to say a leg/squat day). But trying to squat 2x/week, heavy work like this 4x/week ultimately kicks my ass. Can I do it? Sure I could — but recovery needs to take a higher priority, and that’s many times difficult for me because of life. I have found that 3x/week works alright for me, and with a upper/lower type of split that’s about 4-5 days between sessions — which may be about right.

So for the past week I was thinking about hitting Paul Carter’s “Inception” again because that seemed right up the alley. But I admit I wasn’t sure how well the 4x/week would do for me. So last night I opted to flip back to Paul’s Guaranteed Muscle Mass program. This is that A/B 1/2 split, it works 3x/week so it takes 4 weeks to fully “cycle” through it. I’ve done it before, about a year ago, but because I was Defattening I ran it 4x/week — and it kicked my ass. But I think about the circumstnaces: 4x/week (program is written for 3x/week), I was defattening so I was low on fuel (and now I’m not), and I’ve got some other things going on right now that well…. I suspect this might work out for me.

So, giving it a shot. I’ll run it for 8 weeks and see how it goes. Yeah, I hate it to some extent — shit like split squats I just hate, but they are good for me and really kick my ass so… here I am.

SO! How about today?

I only had a rough idea of where weights and reps would be for today, so I just picked some things, did what I could, and I’ll adjust for next time.

It felt good to (back) squat again, tho for sure this is the biggest place I need to bring my strength up. I miss squatting in the 300’s and I really want to get back there.

Stiffs went fine, and I think it’ll be good for me — letting my back bend over, get rounded, I think my lower back needs that sort of thing right now. It’s hard to explain, but these days I find myself just bending over and letting my lower back “expand and relax” like that and it feels good. A little too heavy on the AMRAP set, so I’ll adjust for that, but otherwise I was fine.

And split squats. How I hate you. These kick my ass so hard, but they are so good for me. My knees appreciate it and are better for it.

Another note: it’s amazing how quickly you lose conditioning. All these AMRAP sets, 1-minute rest between all sets, man… I was huffing and puffing. If anything, that’s why I gave out “so soon” on my AMRAP sets — conditioning stopped me before anything else. That will come back in time. Just keep working and pushing.

Based on Paul Carter’s “Guaranteed Muscle Mass” article.

  • Squat
    • BW x 10
    • bar x 5
    • 135 x 5
    • 175 x 4
    • 215 x 3
    • 245 x 2
    • 265 x 1
    • 215 x 12 (AMRAP)
    • 215 x 6 (50%)
  • Stiff-Legged Deadlift
    • 135 x 5
    • 185 x 4
    • 225 x 3
    • 275 x 2
    • 325 x 1
    • 275 x 6 (AMRAP)
  • Split Squats
    • BW x 10 (each leg)
    • BW x 10
    • BW x 10
    • BW x 10
    • BW x 10

Simple in operation, but difficult in utilization

Revolvers are SIMPLE in operation, but DIFFICULT in utilization. The long, DA trigger pull takes work to perfect. Sending that shot straight, takes precision and care. Of course, any of this can be addressed through practice, but I absolutely believe that it is easier to train a novice on a compact framed or full sized semi-automatic pistol, than it is to train the same person on a revolver. As much as I love K frame revolvers for all around use, the learning curve is steeper with the revolver, versus the semi-auto.

From Dr. Sherman House, emphasis added.

Simple in operation but difficult in utilization. This is the phrase I’ve been struggling to find. I see many people recommend revolvers for people who don’t train, aren’t willing to train/practice, etc. under the premise that they are simple to operate — “just point and click”. But most people cannot shoot revolvers as well as a semi-auto for all manner of reasons, and isn’t the desired goal to be able to shoot well and effectively?

A Glock operates just as simply, and more people can shoot it well and effectively. Certainly when you look at a semi-auto like a 1911 or a Beretta, the revolver operates more simply; but we live in the 21st century — our tools have improved. 🙂

Thanx for the phrasing, Doc!