It’s not my problem

I’m in my truck, sitting at a stop light. First in line, with one car behind me.

I see a man cross the street, heading in my general direction. I keep an eye on him.

He moves down the street, ultimately crossing the street behind the car behind me. He continues down the road without incident. I had no reason to believe anything would happen, but better to keep your eyes peeled than risk being caught off guard.

But as he moved, I pulled plans out of my mental file cabinet for dealing with the situation should X happen. It is about being prepared and a little head in my OODA loop in case something does happen, but it’s more about planning and practicing and ensuring there’s something in the file cabinet, perhaps refining what’s in there, perhaps ensuring what’s in there is still relevent, etc..

If he started to directly approach my car, especially in a quick or aggressive manner, right foot gets applied to gas pedal, steering wheel turns to the right so I can enter the flow of traffic (or at least not t-bone a car that might be in the intersection). Basically, get out of there.

But he passed my car and started on a trajectory that looked like it might approach the car behind me.

What then?

If he started something with the driver of the car behind me, what should I do?

I know many good-minded citizens would want to stop the altercation. You see someone getting the stuffing beat out of them and you want to step in. You see someone getting carjacked, you want to do something about it.

And some might think, “I have a gun… and could use it”. True, you could, and here in Texas you could be legally justified to use deadly force in defense of a third party. Maybe. It’ll all depend upon the particular circumstances.

But just because you legally can, does that mean you should?

Some might be motivated by not wanting to be haunted by “after the fact” thoughts of “if I had only done something”.

But I say, you have to figure that out beforehand and come to terms with whatever your decision is. You have to know what you’ll do, where your lines are drawn, and to be sure you can justify and live with your decision.

I’ll admit, I can’t say with 100% certainty what I would do because it will depend upon the specific circumstance. But in general, I may not get involved. I don’t know what’s going on. I don’t know these people, nor what the problem is. The person that looks like the “bad guy” might in fact be the “good guy”, which I just can’t know unless I know the whole story, and that’s something I won’t have nor receive in time. I might be inserting myself somewhere I shouldn’t, and could be causing even bigger problems for myself. Is that worth it? For what it could bring to myself? to my family? the court case, the lawyers, the public muckraking?

Maybe.

For me the question is: is it worth dying over?

Is it worth leaving my wife without a husband? my children without a father?

Maybe.

In general, probably not. If I take the specific situation that could have unfolded behind me, say a carjacking, I probably would have stayed as long as I could to get relevant information like a description (already mentally recording that as I watched the guy walk), perhaps a car description, and dial 911 and let APD sort it out. My feet would have also stayed ready to hit the gas pedal, because if it looked to put me in danger, I would want to get out of it as quickly as possible. If things didn’t get that ugly, I might stay around to help the victim. But it really all depends upon the specifics.

The bottom line: I want to go home. This is a guiding principle for me. Yes it’s selfish of me, but I think Wife and Kiddos appreciate it.

You have to know where your line is, and you need to know it BEFORE the flag flies. Use every day situations and ask yourself “what if?” to help you figure out a playbook, and also find your limits.

4 thoughts on “It’s not my problem

  1. If we could govern ,or refine the sympathetic nervous system resonse that a provacation or an attack soicits we could make better concious decisions.Some people that live in a world of violence can and do much better than a commom ol Joe that is a peace seeker,such as myself.Quick draws from my holster often solicit that nervous response from fear of shooting myself,and render my ability.When confident I wont shoot myself I do better but have to wonder how I would do under pressure.
    I liken the decisions that can be made to those of defensve driving,avoiding accidents and road rage.Most accdents occur before stimultion of the sympathetic nervous system can take over,and often after such accidents one can visualize what evasive action could have prevented the collision,yet while driving we feel that ability is already available.In a collision the nervous system response may not be a helpful factor in steering an automobile clear of danger,it could actually cause an accident if an attack accurred such as a carjacking.
    Most of us freeze up in disbelief when the insant for avoidance is present,if we are lucky enough for that instance.I think that factor would also prevent intervention by an onlooker if there was that instance of opportunity.Bullying would be less prevalant if people were more willing to intervene.
    You are right on with making decisions that would allow or not allow interventions with others misfortune,and would have to live with those decisions,but it is better to live with those than to die with regret.

    • This is where “Force-on-Force” scenario training is helpful. It puts you in “real” situation. You have to think what will you do, what could you do? and if you’re going to make a wrong decision, better to make it in a forgiving environment than when the decisions matter and the mistakes are costly. And then, it helps you formulate a proper response that you can use should something happen for real.

  2. Pingback: I detect a theme… « Stuff From Hsoi

  3. Pingback: Informational malnutrition, and the death of Truth « Stuff From Hsoi

Comments are closed.