The Smith & Wesson M&P

Back when I was first deciding on a carry gun, it came down to two choices: Springfield XD, Smith & Wesson M&P.

By all accounts, I liked the M&P, and I bet I would have gone with it. But why didn’t I? It was brand new to the market. It was unproven. S&W had their whole Sigma fiasco, and was this going to be another Sigma? I was buying a gun to bet my life on, so I felt it was better to choose the proven model. Thus I went with the XD.

Now, I’m not unhappy with the choice, but having shot multiple thousands of rounds through it, held it in my hands for a long time, well… I can see how it’s not a 100% perfect choice for me. The main thing? It’s one-size-fits… someone. Now that interchangeable backstraps are all the rage, I can feel how the XD doesn’t quite fit my hand right. The backstraps were a big reason I wanted the M&P. And I have said that if I was buying an XD now I’d buy the XD(m) because of its changeable backstraps.

Over the Combative Pistol 2 weekend, I got to try out an M&P with a trigger kit job by Apex Tactical Specialities. I’m not sure I like it, but I can see the difference. There’s a lot of “springy” takeup, but the distance between that break and reset? Wow. I can see how this can be a fast gun with that trigger. I’d have to shoot such a gun for a while to get used to it, and apparently you can change different parts in the kit to get different feels. So… much playing would have to be done.

As well, Lynn Givens was carrying an M&P. I noticed she had a light texturing job done to her backstrap. I liked it. One thing I don’t like about my XD is the grip isn’t very grippy. But getting something like a stipple job from Springer Precision? even his mildest is too aggressive for a gun carried IWB against the skin. The XD(m)’s grip is better. The job Lynn had? I liked.

Lynn also pointed out something critical. One problem I have (and it was evident all weekend long in CP2) is I shoot slightly left. I know the problem. It’s how my trigger finger enters the trigger guard. It’s the angle of how everything meets, my physiology, my finger enters the guard angled slightly downward angle, and so my finger rides slightly on the frame and pushes it left. But on her M&P? I had no problems. There was no contact. I’d need to do more shooting with the M&P to verify that, but gosh… ain’t that a plus?

Now that the M&P has been on the market for a while, it’s being picked up as the duty gun in many police departments (Austin PD is now standardizing on the M&P in .40 S&W), Team S&W is winning lots of pistol competitions with almost stock M&P’s (might just have better sights and better trigger, but that’s all), it’s got a lot behind it. So, the one reason I didn’t want the gun? no longer an issue.

All I need now is the money fairy. 🙂

5 thoughts on “The Smith & Wesson M&P

  1. I have tried the M&P myself, and it’s the only plastic gun I have not had the off to the left problem with.

    To me, the trigger feels somewhat similar to a Browning Hi-Power, which is another gun I find easy to put the rounds where I want without constantly thinking about my trigger pull.

    • Is your “off to the left” problem also due to trigger finger contacting/rubbing the frame? I know you’ve got bigger, thicker hands.

      I want to do more research and work with the M&P before I plunk my money down. But sure it looking like I might make a switch.

      • It’s probably a number of reasons. If I really try I can keep them centered, but it’s way too much mental effort. It doesn’t feel natural, and I probably wouldn’t do it under pressure.

        I’m kind of lazy when it comes to this. If I can’t shoot the pistol without having to tweak a number things about myself or the gun, I just move on.

        • That’s actually a good indicator… “it just works” sort of thing. So if the M&P “just works” for you, that’s a good indicator.

  2. Pingback: More M&P blarg « Stuff From Hsoi

Comments are closed.