To cross-train, or not

The big thing in martial arts these days (and many other places, but I’m talking martial arts) is to cross-train. I would say this has become prominent due to the rise of mixed-martial arts (MMA) which is all about cross-training.

The intent it this: you study one art, you may be limited in what you can do, thus you ought to train in another art to ensure you don’t have any weak areas or holes in your game. For instance, these days the classic MMA formula is: muay thai for striking, wrestling for takedowns (or maybe judo), and Brazillian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) for groundwork. The intent is that say, muay thai only covers striking (limited view I know, but go with me) but it’s really good at striking, so if you want to get your striking game you study that. But if that’s all you studied, what would happen if the fight ended up on the ground? Thus, you need to study BJJ to cover that aspect. The end result is you end up being a well-rounded fighter.

Then you get some arts, such as Kuk Sool, that claim to not need cross-training because they are a complete art. Speaking on Kuk Sool, I can say it is fairly complete but does lack in some areas. I know some Kuk Sool folk that have thrown down with BJJ guys and get p0wned; while concepts and principles are there, Kuk Sool’s curriculum just doesn’t emphasize the depth of what BJJ does on the ground. A Kuk Sool person may have enough ground skill to deal with a street fight or self-defense situation, but full-on ground fighting competition? Won’t happen.

But whatever the approach, be it a single art that claims comprehensiveness or you take multiple arts to gain the same broad spectrum of study, the end result and goal is the same of covering all the bases.

While this sounds great, is it always the best and right thing to do? I’d argue it depends upon your training goals.

Let’s say you have a pile of bricks with which to build your house. You can build in one of two directions: you can build up or out. You can stack all your bricks on top of each other. That would be like studying a single-focused art. You would get very good in that one aspect very quickly, but your house isn’t very wide and you would lack in those other areas. You could stack your bricks side by side. That would be like cross-training or studying a broad-focus/comprehensive art. You’d gain a lot of breadth of knowledge, but it’s not going to be very deep. Over time, you end up stacking your bricks in the other direction: if you stacked up, eventually you’ll stack out and build those stacks upwards as well; if you stacked out, you’ll add height to those stacks as time goes on. In the long run, the theory is that you’ll wind up at the same place, with a wide and tall stack of bricks. So the question then becomes: what do you want now? And are you willing to invest the time and effort to get to that same place way down the line? Again, it all depends upon your goals.

Furthermore, what is your learning style like? Do you need focus? Or can you deal with a lot of different concepts and techniques coming at you at once? Do you feel you can practice all of those well-enough, or might you be better just working on a few things at a time? Everyone varies on this. Know yourself and your learning style.

For me, Kuk Sool was a comprehensive approach. I like the art for that reason, because I do see the merits in being well-rounded. However, you have to mind that your training will allow you to build those wide stacks into tall stacks. Often the training at my dojang didn’t go that way: you’d have a 60 minute class with 15 minutes of warm-up, 15 minutes on forms, 15 minutes on breakfalls, then 15 minutes on techniques (or some breakdown like that). Sometimes you might have 45 minutes focused on something. But it would vary, especially depending upon the composition of the class in terms of students and their grade level. I often felt that I didn’t quite get the depth of study that I desired.

I left Kuk Sool and am now studying Kali, Silat, Jun Fan arts, Muay Thai, and western boxing. That still seems like a lot, but in many respects it’s all “stand-up” work. At my current school I could also study BJJ, but I opted against that because I want to focus a bit more on my stand-up. For you see, my cross-training isn’t just in empty-hand arts, but defensive firearms (especially handgunning) is a martial art for me as well. My cross-training blends firearms and empty-hand arts, and for me wanting to focus on my hand work is currently where my goals lie. Eventually I’ll dive into BJJ, but for now digesting the “stand-up” curriculum at my new school is certainly enough. I want to get up to speed with the stand-up stuff quickly. I’d like to build my new stack a little higher before I start building out.

To cross-train or not? That’s a personal matter. Don’t just cross-train because it’s trendy, but choose what approach you take based upon the goals that you have for yourself. Remember that martial arts are a personal journey, so make sure you’re on the journey that you want to take.

5 thoughts on “To cross-train, or not

  1. Nice read. My father is currently going through the same decisions. He studied and taught Aikido for most of his life and is now looking at other martial arts. He says that they all have their similarities even though they are different so learning more than one can help you understand others.

    • Thank you.

      In the end, yes most arts are fundamentally the same as the body can only bend and move in so many ways… and ultimately everything is a push, pull, or twist. The differences come in philosophy, not just heavy philsophy such like aikido has, but even just in the approach and emphasis the art takes towards how it deals with bending and moving the body.

      Learning others, even if not formally (e.g. just taking seminars, reading, working out with folks that study other arts) certainly does open your eyes up, and can make your core art even stronger.

      Good luck to Dad there on his studies.

  2. Excellent post! I started martial arts way back when instruction from real practitioners was difficult to come by. Not to mention that black belts were “bullet proof,” as well as a lot of other nonsense.
    To make this short; my first instructor was transferred back to Korea. Another Korean Marine was stationed at Camp Pendleton a few months later, and my studies resumed. The name had changed, but it was the same art. Soo Bak Do became Tang Soo Do. Then he returned to Korea… I took up boxing at the Boys Club as well as some Judo there, but our teacher (I refuse to call him Sensei)was only a green belt and had no authority to promote. (Or teach as far as that went.) That lasted for a year or so, and then my second grade teachers uncle moved to California from Japan. He started teaching Shotokan, and the Mura Jujitsu system. He allowed me to attend classes, but after a short period (Two months?) He advised me that my temperament would be better suited elsewhere. He referred me to Master Morihi Takanaka. There I began the study of Kor Yu, War Art. I learned Tai Jitsu as taught by the Sho Morin Brotherhood, as well as various weapons after a few years. Yagyu Shinkage Kenjitsue, and Iaido/jutsu, as well as Yari Jutsu to name a few. So? I was pretty well rounded right? Nope, Sensei sent me off to learn occidental wrestling as well. I made the mistake of earning Sho Dan… Guess what? Sensei sent me back to earn rank in what was by then Tae Kwan Do!

    The Brotherhood demands what you call Cross training. Ya can’t make Ni Dan without an additional Sho Dan or equivalent in another discipline.

    After being on this spinning blue ball for more than fifty-seven years? I wholly support multi-discipline training.

    You have a great blog, and I hope that I am welcome to post here, as well as add you to my blogroll. WordPress has been not playing nice with me about that for some reason! LOL!

    • You certainly are welcome to post here! I actually read your blog via my RSS reader but just realized you’re not in my blogroll. I have corrected that.

      That’s quite a martial journey you’ve had. Overall, I do think cross-training is a beneficial thing. The more you can know, the better your perspective becomes. Of course, we have to ensure we don’t just become collectors of knowledge… we must ensure what we learn becomes useful in some way, else we discard it. Still, it’s better to gain then discard than to never gain at all… while the end result may appear the same, it’s not. So really, to cross-train is good and needed, but it’s just a question of how you want to approach it that matters. And that is based upon your goals, both short and long term.

      Thanx for the comments! Looking forward to more in the future.

  3. Pingback: The simplicity of the crossada « Stuff From Hsoi

Comments are closed.