The money trail never lies

A couple days ago I mentioned SOPA and wrote:

I haven’t looked to follow the money trail yet, but I’m sure there are folks in Congress that are benefitting from this, else they wouldn’t be trying to hammer this horrible piece of legislation through.

I didn’t know for sure if there was a money trail, but was 99 and 44/100th’s percent sure there had to be because hey… we know that big business and big government are in bed together. It’s a tale told hundreds of times a day for hundreds of years. Why buck the trend now?

Well, sure enough

“Representative Lamar Smith, the creator of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), has been consistently receiving donations averaging $50 000 from the TV/Film/Music industry for each of his re-election campaigns for the past ten years. Smith has received roughly half a million dollars from the TV/Film/Music lobby over the past ten years according to opensecrets.org. Check out the source link for a full breakdown of donors to Smith’s campaigns.”

Gee… surprised?

So… for all the haters of the Tea Party, and for all the lovers of OWS (one and the same, perhaps?). Why aren’t you hating on your friends in Hollywood? They’re one of the biggest businesses out there, one of the biggest corporate evils playing around with such things. Where’s the hate for them? Why are you embracing their likes within your ranks? They’re obviously part of the problem too….

These are the people making (uninformed) decisions

You expect people in positions of power, that are saddled with the responsibility to make decisions, to make the best decisions they can, right? And part of making the best decision possible is to be as informed as possible on the topic, right? There’s nothing good that comes from decisions made out of ignorance, is there?

Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA, is getting railroaded through the US Congress.

I haven’t looked to follow the money trail yet, but I’m sure there are folks in Congress that are benefitting from this, else they wouldn’t be trying to hammer this horrible piece of legislation through.

What’s worse is that the legislation is being driven by people who have no idea what they’re talking about — and are content in their refusal to become educated. See this article from Vice (h/t Slashdot).

When the security issue was brought up, Rep. Mel Watt of North Carolina seemed particularly comfortable about his own lack of understanding. Grinningly admitting “I’m not a nerd” before the committee, he nevertheless went on to dismiss without facts or justification the very evidence he didn’t understand and then downplay the need for a panel of experts. Rep. Maxine Waters of California followed up by saying that any discussion of security concerns is “wasting time” and that the bill should move forward without question, busted internets be damned.

[…]

So it was as proponents of the Hollywood-funded bill curmudgeonly shot down all but two amendments proposed by its opponents, who fought to dramatically alter the document to preserve security and free speech on the net. But the chilling takeaway of this whole debacle was the irrefutable air of anti-intellectualism; that inescapable absurdity that we have members of Congress voting on a technical bill who do not posses any technical knowledge on the subject and do not find it imperative to recognize those who do.

This used to be funny, but now it’s really just terrifying. We’re dealing with legislation that will completely change the face of the internet and free speech for years to come. Yet here we are, still at the mercy of underachieving Congressional know-nothings that have more in common with the slacker students sitting in the back of math class than elected representatives. The fact that some of the people charged with representing us must be dragged kicking and screaming out of their complacency on such matters is no longer endearing — it’s just pathetic and sad.

It doesn’t matter what the particular piece of legislation is (tho this particular one is terrible, and the only people coming out in support of it are the dinosaurs in Hollywood that still don’t get it). We don’t need decision-makers and law-makers who take pride in their ignorance and wish to make laws based upon their ignorance (like the “shoulder thing that goes up”). It will only lead to bad things.

But it seems not all is lost… it appears further debate will be delayed until after the holiday recess.

Regardless, witness the way things have proceeded. Pride in their ignorance, a desire to railroad things through, no original desire to hear all sides of the story especially from those that might actually have a clue about the impact of this… what does that tell you?

If you’re not disgusted… well, why aren’t you?

Bill of Rights Day

Today is Bill of Rights Day.

From its Preamble

The Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

In order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers….

Restrictive clauses.

It’s a shame that not just those in Washington, but so many of the citizens of this country, seem to forget that government should be restrained and controlled… not the citizens.

No Tin-Foil Hat Needed

I remember when the “Fast & Furious” scandal broke, some were claiming the whole thing was being done to manufacture a case for more gun control laws. The response from many was such thinking was ludicrous — our government wouldn’t do that.

Riiiiiiiiiiigt.

There’s no need for the tin-foil hat, because it’s true, as CBS News reports.

Even if you’re the most stringent anti-gunner, I hope you can see the corruption and will refuse to tolerate it. This isn’t about guns; it’s way beyond that.

Don’t Check “Asian”

Lanya Olmstead was born in Florida to a mother who immigrated from Taiwan and an American father of Norwegian ancestry. Ethnically, she considers herself half Taiwanese and half Norwegian. But when applying to Harvard, Olmstead checked only one box for her race: white.

“I didn’t want to put ‘Asian’ down,” Olmstead says, “because my mom told me there’s discrimination against Asians in the application process.”

Full story.

My mother is Korean. My father is American, with his father of German and his mother of Scots-Irish descent. So, I’m some sort of half-breed mutt. People see my name, John Daub, and how “white” can you get? They hear my voice over the phone and I sound “white”. But then they see me and my physical looks contrast against those other indicators, and it’s always amusing to me to watch people have that moment of cognitive dissonance while they try to figure me out.

I’m not offended by it because I understand we’re human and we are who and what we are. I understand the contrasts, I also understand that humans like to categorize. I understand that I present contrasts and things that don’t add up. Really, I don’t get bothered by the race issue and openly joke about it because life’s too short to get caught up in it. Of course, if someone is being hurtful well, that’s different… that’s just being hurtful or being an asshole, and I don’t care for that regardless of the context, being presented based upon my race, ethnicity, or my choice in clothing.

But just like these people don’t want to check “Asian” on their forms, I joke with people who I will check whatever box you want to help you fill your quota: I can be white, I can be Asian, whatever helps you satisfy your agenda.

I also recognize that’s the problem (and it’s part of why I joke about it, in hopes of opening dialogue).

See, a lot of people don’t view the problems presented in this article as a real problem. It’s not viewed as racist because a stereotype of “being smart” doesn’t seem like a negative thing. But, as you can read in the article, it is. It causes problems. And ultimately the problem is because of forced diversity. The schools aren’t choosing the best students, they are choosing based upon a whole slew of criteria — race/ethnicity being one of them. So maybe this person isn’t as good of a student, but because they need to have people will all sorts of skin tones walking around, they’ll choose someone based upon their skin tone over someone who may not have the right skin tone but is a better student.

Is that right?

I thought we weren’t supposed to care about the color of someone’s skin? If so, then why are we?

If we’re not supposed to care about the color of someone’s skin, then we need to stop caring about the color of someone’s skin… period. Else, you’ll always have “discrimination”-based problems. And we’ll continue to be divided and have animosity.

There’s another way, y’know….

California (that kinda says it all right there) starts to enforce a sales tax on guns purchased out of state. (h/t NRANews)

Granted, it’s a law that’s been on the books since 1935, but that’s not the gripe. It’s the logic behind the tax:

Buying a gun online is usually a cheaper option and until now, those buyers did not have to pay a tax. But,the state says that tax actually helps local retailers by evening the playing field, saying

“The use tax is intended to protect California sellers who otherwise would be at a competitive disadvantage when out-of-state sellers make sales of goods to California customers without charging tax.”

It’s all about evening the playing field.

So, tax everyone.

You know, removing the tax would even the playing field too. Funny how that option is never considered (by the folks that couldn’t survive without taxes).

Ce n’est pas un fusil

A teenager is stopped by TSA agents for a gun-shaped emblem on her purse.

“She was like, ‘This is a federal offense because it’s in the shape of a gun,'” Gibbs said. “I’m like, ‘But it’s a design on a purse. How is it a federal offense?'”

I can make my fingers into the shape of a gun. Is that a Federal offense? I know this country has gone off the deep end, but if that is the case then we’ve truly lost it.

“I carried this from Jacksonville to Norfolk, and I’ve carried it from Norfolk to Jacksonville,” Vanessa said. “Never once has anyone said anything about it until now.”

Even if the policy is legit, the inconsistent application of the policy is massive FAIL. Way to keep things “secure”.

A TSA official at JIA said it’s not that uncommon for passengers to wear something that could be considered a gun replica, but the official encourages everyone to check the prohibited items list, which can be found online or at the airport before going through security.

This is not a gun, nor a gun replica. Nor are purses on the prohibited items list.

They said we’d not live in fear, but they didn’t say we wouldn’t have to live with stupidity. *sigh*

Incongruity

There’s varying levels of outrage about police activity in regards to the Occupy protests. Some see it as “they got what they asked for”, some see it as massive police brutality. However you look at it, it’s generally being framed as “police are bad”.

What gets me then is these same people tend to be anti-gun. They tend to say that private citizens shouldn’t be allowed to own guns — and the police are there to protect us.

So, the police both brutalize you and protect you… supposedly.

Hrm.

Y’all need to do something about your worldview. Maybe stop relying upon others so much, and expecting others to provide for you.

He’s not from Austin

Sheriff Chuck Wright opened his news conference by saying, “Our form of justice is not making it,” and he said, “I’m really aggravated.”

He said, “Carry a concealed weapon. That’ll fix it.”

[…]

He encouraged women to walk in groups, and he ended by saying again, “I want you to get a concealed weapons permit. Don’t get Mace. Get a firearm.”

Full Story.

Yeah, there are more gun owners in Austin than you might think… but Austin’s Police Chief, Art Acevedo? You’d never hear him say something like that.

Chief? I’d love you to prove me wrong.