Is it worth dying for?

WASHINGTON, Pa. — A Pennsylvania bank robber fatally shot a supermarket customer who ran after him and tried to stop his getaway car, police said.

Full story here.

In short, man sees a dude acting strange, shortly thereafter hears a scream from inside the bank and the dude running out. Man gives chase, tries to stop the dude, and gets killed for his efforts.

I cannot fault the man for seeing wrong and trying to do something about it. I’m sure he didn’t think, he just reacted. His intentions were good and honorable.

Unfortunately, his good intentions got him killed.

I’m not saying you should do such things, nor am I saying you shouldn’t.

What I am saying is, you need to answer this question for yourself: what is worth dying for?

You need to answer this question NOW, not later. When the fur flies, you will not have time to think, only do. You need to know where your line is, what you are willing to die for, and what you are unwilling to die for. You might find your line is in a different place than you thought it was. There is no shame in that, because it’s better to be honest with yourself. Who knows… maybe your life circumstance changed. I know if I was single and childless my line would be in a different place than it is with me being married with children. Whatever your reasons are, don’t be ashamed and don’t worry what others might think, especially if it might be some ego “less manly” type of thing. Those calling you wussy aren’t going to support your children when you’re dead. They’re not going to comfort your grieving widow. They’re not going to pay your medical bills when you’re in the hospital. This is your life, not theirs, and you don’t answer to them. Know what you are willing to and unwilling to die for, and answer only to yourself and your god.

Just be sure you figure out that answer now, when it’s nice to know, before you need to know.

 

AAR KR Training – 2013-06-15, Basic Pistol 2

This Basic Pistol 2 class at KR Training was typical in most ways, but atypical in a very significant one.

Sold out class. Wide variety of folks. One thing that was cool was seeing a lot “pairs”, be it husband and wife, boyfriend and girlfriend, or father and son. Had a fair number of those in this class, and it was nice to see folks strengthening relationships this way.

For the most part, it was a typical Basic Pistol 2 class. Safety, fundamentals, working on sights and trigger, the “press-out”.

What was atypical? The sheer variety of guns. The past some years we’ve seen consolidation towards Glock, M&P, XD/XDm. You get the occasional Sig or 1911, or random other thing. This class was pretty wide across the board. What struck me the most was the sheer number of DA/SA style guns, like Beretta PX4’s and Beretta 92’s. Normally we don’t have to talk much about “guns with a decocker” or the realities of working with DA/SA guns (other than “avoid them”), but we had to make extra effort to work with it in this class. One lady had a P226 DAK, which was a long heavy but at least consistent pull; oddly, she didn’t struggle much with the gun (typically not the case).

We also had a few cases of the opposite gun-fit problem. Whereas normally the problem is small hands with large gun, we had a few cases of large hands and small guns. For example, one gentleman had a fine Springfield 1911, but his hands were so big that the controls didn’t always work. He would press the trigger and the gun wouldn’t go bang; turns out just the way things were with his hands vs. the grip wound up with the grip safety not being fully depressed. We lent him one of Karl’s double-stacked STI’s and an instant world of difference.

The big take-home? Equipment matters. Your equipment can and will influence your ability to shoot. It will affect your skill, both in a good way and a bad way. Sure, you can master a DA/SA trigger press (look at Ben Stoeger), but do you have the time and dedication to do so? Lend someone an M&P or a Glock and after a few shots to get used to the improved trigger (vs. their DA/SA) and it’s a world of difference and improvement.

That little gun you bought for concealed carry? You can’t get your hands on it, you cannot manipulate and shoot it. How useful will that be if you have to use it to defend yourself? Yes, most people can conceal a full-sized pistol without much problem (with the right holster, etc.). There is a place for small guns, but when you are just starting out, when you are just learning to shoot, get a full-sized gun. Learn to shoot well first, then learn to master the little gun later.

Don’t get married to your equipment – it’s just steel and plastic. Work to find the right gun that fits you and you can shoot well; a gun that doesn’t get in your way, that you don’t have to fight. Here’s helpful guide. You will shoot better with the right equipment.

 

Changes to Texas gun laws

The following is a copy/paste of an email from the Texas State Rifle Association giving an update on how gun-related bills fared in this past Texas legislative session.

Governor Perry Signs All Gun Bills
Last Thursday, Governor Perry added conservative issues to the last two weeks of the Special Session but the list did not include gun-related bills.  While this is disappointing, all the pro-gun bills passed during the regular session have now been signed into law and will take effect September 1st.   The list includes some major streamlines for concealed handgun licensees.SB 1907 by Sen. Glenn Hegar/ Rep. Tim Kleinschmidt allows CHL-students to have firearms in their personal locked vehicle when parked on a private or public university or college parking lot.  A CHL-student could not be prosecuted but they were subject to the rule-making authority of the school and could be expelled.   Passed and signed by Governor Perry.

SB 299 by Sen. Craig Estes/Rep. Kenneth Sheets provides language to clarify the unintentional display of a firearm by a concealed handgun licensee. The language changed from “failure to conceal” to “intentional display of a weapon in a public place” when force or deadly force is not authorized.  Passed and Signed by Governor Perry

SB 864 by Sen. Donna Campbell/Rep. Dan Flynn reduces the number of hours for the initial CHL class. The bill does not touch the required materials, the written test, or firearm proficiency exam. Range qualification is still in place but no counts toward the required hours.  Passed and Signed by Governor Perry

HB 48 by Rep. Dan Flynn/Sen. Donna Campbell creates in statute a process for renewing your CHL online without taking a renewal class. Passed and Signed by Governor Perry 6/14/13 

HB 698 by Rep.Springer/Sen. Craig Estes requires access to digital fingerprinting not more than 25 miles from the applicant’s residence and is limited to counties with a population of 46,000 or less.  This is specific to rural Texans who are forced to drive hundreds of miles for digital fingerprinting.  Passed and Signed by Governor Perry 6/14/13

HB 3142 by Rep. Cecil Bell, Jr./Sen. Craig Estes repeals the SA/NA designation for the CHL license.  No more gun categories.  Passed and Signed by Governor Perry 6/14/13

HB 1421 by Rep. Perry/Sen. Craig Estes provides law enforcement agencies an option in statute to sell confiscated firearms to a federal firearm dealer (FFL) instead of destroying. After the cost of the sale and any other related charges, funds could stay with that law enforcement agency.  Passed and Signed by Governor Perry

HB 333 by Rep. Guillen/ Sen. Hinojosa requires hotels and motels to provide advance notice if they prohibit firearms.    Passed and Signed by Governor Perry

Check out more bill status at www.tsrapac.com  or check directly at the state site www.legis.state.tx.us 
 
 
Please help rebuild the PAC!~.  Political Action Committee funds help pro-gun candidates.  We need to support those who support us.   Go towww.tsra.com or call 512-615-4200.  Make a donation, join the association or up-grade your membership.
 
Keep the Faith,
 


Alice Tripp

Legislative Director

Some of my comments:

SB 1907 – baby steps

SB 299 – I think the intent of the law was always clear, but it’s nice to have it explicitly clear.

SB 864 – I have some mixed emotions here, but I think the end it doesn’t matter much. There’s no change to curriculum or requirements, merely accounting. The way it was made for a long day often with much filler and ways to meet the required hours. Now things can be more direct, concise, with less time wasted on everyone’s part. There will always be someone willing to abuse this tho, so vet your instructors carefully.

HB 48 – it’s good to embrace the Internet

HB 698 – reduction in burden is always good.

HB 3142 – good. This was silly.

HB 1421 – options are good

HB 333 – good. A little annoyed at the hassle, but hopefully winds up making things better for everyone in the end.

In a lot of ways, what I’m happy about is how these new laws remove things that didn’t make a lot of sense. It’s not really adding, it’s taking away, and that I can deal with.

Finally, if you like these laws, then you should be a member of the TSRA and support the TSRA-PAC. These laws don’t just magically happen. Yes, the NRA gets all the press and likes to take all the glory here, but Alice Tripp deserves so much of the credit for her work to make these things happen. If you are a Texas resident, if you appreciate and benefit from the laws of this state, show your support. (disclosure: I am a Life Member of the TSRA, and only “lobby” for their support because it’s one way I can add my voice to the legislative process… and you can too).

Gun blarg

I know. Lots of posting about lifting things up and putting them down.

Not enough posting about shooty goodness.

Mainly, I’ve been busy and finding time to write has been difficult.

But I have been working on a deeper  and longer article about “minimum competency” regarding defensive pistol skills. That’ll be posted soon, and probably in parts to make it more consumable. So, fret not. 🙂

 

AAR – KR Training, 2013-06-08, Basic Pistol 1

Another month, another Basic Pistol 1 @ KR Training on the books.

Oddly, enrollment was down. We’ve had nothing but sold out classes for the first half of the year. I’m guessing it’s the typical reasons: it’s hot, it was the first weekend after government schools let out for the summer so families were heading out. But I can’t help but wonder if it’s perhaps the pendulum  swinging back — so much gun rush/panic, everyone’s panicked out, so now there’s a lull to compensate for the overcompensation. *shrug*  Given previous tracks, it’s probably due to the heat.

But still, we had a good class. Two-thirds of the class were women — that’s your growing demographic.

All in all class went alright. I felt a little off in my timing of the class flow, and for that I apologize. We’re always working to improve curriculum and it just gets tougher to get more information into the same limited amount of time. I’m still working on streamlining.

Still, the students were engaged, asking questions, and that’s always a good sign. I hope to see them back, especially when we start offering the force-on-force classes again (when the weather cools down). Hard skills, like marksmanship, are important, but it’s those “soft skills” like awareness, decision-making, etc. that take you further in personal defense.

Thank you all for braving the heat and spending your Saturday with us.

 

The Farnam Drill

My quest to sort out “The Farnam Drill”.

Rangemaster

A few years ago I took a course with Tom Givens and Tom had us shoot a really good drill. I believe the drill went something like this:

Target: 8.5″ x 11″ sheet of paper
Ammunition: 9 live rounds, 1 dummy round
Scoring: All rounds must be on paper, within the time limit.
Time Limit: 15 seconds (tho I think in our class, he made it 12 seconds and I recall he did it in something like 8.5).
Starting Condition: 6 rounds and 1 dummy in the gun (so, a live round in the chamber, then the magazine has 5 rounds with 1 dummy mixed in somewhere). 3 rounds in another magazine. Gun is in the holster, concealed.
Procedure: On the signal, draw and fire until empty, reload, then fire 3 additional rounds. Fix the stoppage when it occurs. You must sidestep on the draw/presentation, on the stoppage, and on the reload.

And that’s all there is to the drill. It’s simple, straightforward, and forces you to do just about every sort of skill you’ll need in a defensive shooting context. I really like this drill because of that efficiency.

But this isn’t the Farnam drill. It’s similar, but it’s Rangemaster’s drill.

Updated 2015-10-06: I spoke with Tom Givens. Scroll to the bottom for more information.

Modified Farnam

Some years ago I saw this post that talked about a “Modified Farnam Drill”. Brillanter.com hasn’t been updated in years, but hasn’t gone away, but just in case something gives, here’s a reprint:

Named for John Farnam, this is probably the best general purpose defensive shooting drill that I have seen. This is a good benchmark for measuring your shooting performance and progress. You will need some inert/dummy cartridges, at least two magazines, and a shot timer. The total round count for this drills is eight live rounds and one dummy round. The setup is as follows.

In the Gun:

  • 1 live round in the chamber.
  • 5 live rounds in the magazine. (Some sources say 4 live rounds.)
  • 1 dummy round in the magazine. (Not the first or last round.

In the Reload:

  • At least three live rounds.

The drill is shot as follows:

  • On the buzzer draw and start shooting.
  • Perform immediate action when you encounter a malfunction.
  • Speed reload when you reach slide lock
  • Shoot twice more.

If you followed the directions correctly you will end up with two empty magazines (one on the ground, one in the gun) and one live round in the chamber.

The “standard” is shooting a 8.5″x11″ sheet of paper at 8 meters with a disqualification for a miss. Farnam expects his students to complete this in 18.25 seconds and his instructors to complete it in 12 seconds.

Now for the “modified” part of the drill:

  • Add one second to your total time for each miss. This allows you to capture your progress. It’s not perfect but it is kind of helpful to see improvements.
  • Change the distance. Both closer and farther away.
  • Reduce the size of the target.
  • Add a step of movement on the draw, immediate action, and reload.
  • Add verbal commands throughout the drill.

The people that seem to have the best success at this drill are the ones with the most efficient gun handling. Being able to quickly and precisely clear the malfunction and speed reload will give you more time to get your hits.

You can see how this is similar to the Rangemaster drill, but also different.

But this still was second-hand information with some uncertainty (e.g. “some sources say”). I wanted to know the proper “Farnam Drill” (or at least, verification the above was in fact correct). Alas, Google wasn’t turning up much solid information, as I recounted a few months ago. I mean, what good is a standard if there’s no standard? If there isn’t one true way of doing something and everyone does it a little different, how can you measure progress? how can you accurately compare?

Of course, I should have just contacted John Farnam and asked… but for some reason I felt I should do more homework before bothering him.

Then I came to see…

The Farnam Drill (maybe)

What helps? Looking not just under “Farnam” but also under names like “DTI Pistol Standards” or his book The Farnam Method of Defensive Handgunning, which is where this came from (the “DTI Defensive Handgun Proficiency Test”). But even then, the words and labels are tossed around a bit, and you’ll find two things.

First, I found what tended to be referred to as the “proficiency test”. The follow comes from this compilation of standards:

TDI’s Defensive Handgun Proficiency Test starts with a holstered pistol with one live round in the chamber and four live rounds and one dummy round (inserted at random). The magazine to be used for reloading is in its carrier and is fully charged with live rounds (no dummies). The student starts moving laterally (staying behind the line) at random within a three-meter area, and at the signal he moves and draws, then continues to hold on the 8 X 10 inch target, trigger finger in register. On the next signal, the student moves laterally again before shooting and fires continuously at the target. The shooter must be in continuous movement during his stoppage clearance and reload. Once the gun runs dry, the student reloads and fires two more rounds. Movement is required during the reload. The student achieves a passing score if he or she hits with all shots within the 22 seconds and does not commit any safety or procedural errors. Safety errors include getting a weak hand or arm in front of the muzzle or a trigger finger that enters the trigger guard when it’s not supposed to. Procedural errors cover failing to move when required, incorrect stoppage clearing, incorrect reloading and the like.

Now you can see this is somewhat like the other two, but not really. Then I read another telling over at the pistol-training forums:

Setup: 8×8 target at 8 yds. Gun loaded with 5 rounds (4 live, 1 dummy, position of dummy unknown to shooter). Dummy should not be first or last round. One mag for reload in carrier with at least 2 rounds (drill is 7 shots total).
Start in interview stance. At the command “Start moving” begin moving laterally at random, scanning area (must scan behind you at least once). At second signal, move and draw, hold on target until timer beeps.
At the beep, move laterally and start firing. When stoppage is encountered, reduce it while moving (tap, rack, bang) and continue firing. After last round reload (while moving) and fire 2 more rounds.
*basically if you’re not shooting you’re moving, and your trigger finger must be in register while moving*
100% hits, no safety violations and proper malfunction and reload procedures to pass. Must move during draw, TRB, and reload; must scan before start signal.
Standard: 22 sec.

Seems to be the same thing, just a different way of saying it. But still, some differences. I saw this version:

Farnam Drill (after John Farnam)

Setup: Target is an 8.5 x 11″ sheet of paper at 8 meters. Shooter begins with gun in the holster (concealed), retention strap engaged if holster is so equipped.

Semi-auto: the gun has a round chambered, with four rounds and a dummy round in the magazine. The dummy round may not be the first or last round in the magazine, and the shooter is not to know which round is the dummy. One magazine on the belt contains two live rounds.

Revolver: cylinder loaded to capacity, speedloader on the belt.

Drill: from interview position (hands at sides, not touching gun), draw and fire into the target. When the dummy round comes up, clear it with tap-rack. Continue firing until you run dry, then speed load and fire the last two shots. Revolvers just draw, shoot all rounds, reload, and then shoot two more.

All shots must hit the target to count, and all procedures (draw, malfunction clearance, reload) must be done correctly. Any miss or any failure to perform the correct procedure disqualifies you.

Par times:

First shot Split times Tap-Rack Reload Total Time
Basic level 25.00
Student Semi-auto 3.00 1.50 3.25 4.50 18.25
Revolver 3.00 1.50 N/A 6.00 18.25
Instructor Semi-auto 2.00 0.75 2.75 3.50 12.00
Revolver 2.00 0.75 N/A 5.00 12.00

All times are measured from shot to shot, and all procedures must be performed in the allotted time to pass. For instructor qualification, the drill must be successfully completed twice in a row.

And while that seems even better, it just adds more murk to the mix.

You want to get yet another version? From the same handgun standards PDF they list the “DTI Pistol Standards”

  • Test uses a standard full size B-27 target resembling the miniature shown on the left
  • Distance will be 8 meters
  • 100% of all rounds must hit inside the target’s 9-ring or break the 9-ring line.
  • Pistol will be drawn from concealment
  • 1st magazine will have 6 rounds, one of which will be a dummy round. The dummy round will not be the first or last in the mag.
  • 2nd magazine will contain at least 3 rounds.
  • Student will start from an interview stance

DIRECTIONS: Draw and fire until the slide locks to the rear. Perform an emergency reload and fire 2 additional rounds. Clear any malfunctions that occur during the test. (dummy round will cause at least one failure to fire)

Student Level Time Instructor Level Time Skill Standard
3.75 2.75 Draw and fire first shot
1.50 (6.0-T) .75 (3.0-T) Average time between 5 additional shots
3.50 2.75 Clear failure to fire caused by dummy round
4.75 3.50 Reload and fire 2 additional rounds
18 Seconds 12 Seconds TOTAL TIME

Confused yet?

Will the real Farnam Drill please stand up?

All of these are close. But let’s turn to The Farnam Method of Defensive Handgunning where the last chapter of the book is titled “DTI Defensive Handgun Proficiency Test”. I’m going to rewrite things slightly, just for format and layout.

Shooter Setup: Interview stance. Gun in holster with retention devices, if any, active. Concealed or in duty rig. Strong hand is not touching or hovering over the pistol.

Weapon Setup – Autoloader: 1 live round in the chamber, 4 live and 1 dummy in the magazine. The dummy is mixed in, but should not be the first nor last round in the magazine, and the exact location unknown to the shooter. Another magazine with at least 2 rounds in it (tho Farnam says it should be fully charged with live rounds). 7 (live) rounds total are used in the drill.
Weapon Setup – Revolver: All chambers loaded with live rounds (regardless if 5 or 6 shot revolver). A speed loader, fully charged with live rounds, and in its carrier. All rounds will be fired, a reload performed, and 2 more live rounds fired. So, there could be 7 or 8 rounds total fired, depending upon the revolver’s capacity. No dummy rounds used.

Target Setup: target is approximately 20cm x 30cm (about 7.87″ x 11.81″), rectangle or oval, steel or paper. Target will be 8 meters (8.74 yards) from the shooter.

Standard/Scoring: Pass/fail. 100% of shots must hit within the time limit in order to pass. Furthermore, no safety errors nor procedural errors in order to pass. A single miss, a single error, fails.
Safety Errors: Shooter’s body parts end up in front of the muzzle. Shooter’s trigger finger enters the trigger guard before the signal to fire, during reloading or stoppage reduction, or when moving.
Procedural Errors: failure to move laterally during draw. Failure to move during stoppage reduction or reloading. Failure to scan prior to the start signal. Incorrect stoppage reduction procedure. Incorrect reloading procedure (e.g. old magazine dropped from the magazine well before new one has cleared the carrier). Incorrect slide manipulation (e.g. hand too far forward, “slingshotting” the slide).

Test:

  • Autoloader
    • Student reports to the line, assumes interview stance, and faces downrange.
      • Command “Start moving”
      • Student starts moving laterally (tho remaining behind the line) at random within a 3 meter area
      • After this command but before the start signal, the student must scan all the way behind them at least once.
    • The start signal is given
      • Shooter simultaneously moves and draws
      • Movement must be lateral and displace the shooter at least 1 meter
      • Shooter continues to hold on target (trigger finger in register) until he hears the timer’s start beep.
    • The timer beeps/starts
      • Before shooting, student must move laterally
      • Student fires continuously at the target.
      • When stoppage encountered, immediately reduce the stoppage then resume firing. Student must be in continuous movement when reducing the stoppage.
      • When the last round is fired, immediately reload and fire two more rounds. Student must be in continuous movement when reloading.
  • Revolver
    • The test is essentially the same, except the first string will be 5 or 6 shots, depending upon the revolver’s capacity.
    • When reloading, all chambers must be reloaded. Still, only 2 shots are fired after the reload.
    • Qualifying times with 5 or 6 shot revolvers are the same, “because the difficulty of accurately shooting the small guns is compensated for by the fact that the shooter is required to shoot 7 rather than 8”.

Qualifying Times: 

  • Student: 22.00 seconds (autoloader or revolver)
  • Instructor: 15.00 seconds (autoloader), 16.00 seconds (revolver)

So there we have it.

I have not (yet) had the good fortune to train with John Farnam, so I can only go upon what I’ve read. It’s well possible that Mr. Farnam has changed things over time. Maybe it was 22 seconds originally then it became 18.25. Maybe it was 4 in the magazine then became 5. I just don’t know. It’s interesting to see such variation in things, where times came from, where procedure came from. And yes, while before I thought I should do some research before contacting Mr. Farnam, I think it may be at the point where it’d be good to ask him if he has any comment. He could provide corrections, authoritative statement of what the drill is, and perhaps if there was evolution or some perspective on these other approaches, maybe he could shed that light.

Nevertheless, I was introduced to this through Tom Givens’ flavor and I think I’ll continue to stick with that. First, I think it’s a slightly tougher version of things because there’s more to do and in less time. Second, since it is what I’ve done before, I already have some baseline data that I can use to track my progress. If you haven’t shot these drills before, I’d say to pick one flavor and stick with it so you can measure your progress over time.

Updated 2015-10-06: Yesterday, Lynn Givens made a Facebook posting referencing her performance on this drill. After some back and forthing on it, Tom Givens sent me this formal write-up of the drill (I’ve reformatted it for display here). Because this is Tom’s version of the drill, he’s called it:

The 3M Test

The 3 M’s are:

  • Marksmanship
  • Movement
  • Manipulations

Background

For many years, Larry Nichols was the Rangemaster of the Burbank, California, police department. He devised the original, simpler version of this drill. He showed it to John Farnam probably 30 years ago, and John modified it to fit his curriculum. John showed his version to me [Tom Givens] 20 years ago, and I made changes to fit my curriculum. This is the version we currently use.

Target & Scoring

Scoring can be Pass/Fail, or modified for Comstock Count Scoring.

One silhouette target at 5 yards. For our purposes, we will use an RM-Q scored 5/3. Or a VSRT, scored 5, 4, 3. Or an IDPA target, scored 5/3/0 for the Comstock Count version. If pass/fail scoring, only the highest value hit zone counts.

Procedure

Shooter starts with handgun loaded with 6 live rounds (1 in chamber, 5 in magazine) and one dummy round in the magazine. Dummy is not the top round nor the bottom round in the magazine. Someone else should load the magazine so the shooter does not know where in the magazine the dummy round lies.

Shooter starts holstered, hands in interview stance. On signal, side step, draw, and fire until a malfunction occurs. On the malfunction, side step, fix it, and continue to fire. When the gun runs empty, side step, perform an emergency reload, and fire 3 additional shots.

Shooter must move on the draw, move on the malfunction, and move on the reload. There will be a ten point penalty for any shot that misses the target, on Comstock. If pass/fail, any round outside the highest value zone is a failure.

Score Calculation

Comstock Count Scoring

Possible score = 45 points. Points divided by time = Index. Index X 30 = Score.

Example: 42 points, fired in 12.15 seconds = 3.46
3.46 X 30= 103.8 Score = 103.8
Par Score = 100
Anything over 100 is very good work. Anything over 125 is extremely high skill.

Pass/Fail Scoring

On Pass/Fail scoring, shooter fails if he:

  • Does not move on the draw, the malfunction, and the reload
  • Does not tap the magazine before running the slide on the malfunction
  • Places a single hit outside the highest scoring zone on the target
  • Time limit is 15 seconds for a Combative Pistol student, 12 seconds for instructors.

Additional

This drill tests movement off the line of force, a rapid presentation from concealment, accurate placement of multiple fast shots, a malfunction remedy, and an empty gun reload, all under time pressure. It only requires 9 rounds [,one dummy round], one target, and a timer or stopwatch to test/measure all of these skills.

October 2016 Update

According to a post by Tom Givens himself (in a private Facebook group), there is a new variation on the 3M Test (Tom just started doing it here in the Fall of 2016). From Tom:

Actually, we just started this about 2 classes ago. After the reload, 3 shots to the chest, then 1 head shot to stop the clock. Total of 10 rounds. Par time is 15 seconds for students, 12 seconds for instructors.

Hsoi’s Comments

The 3M Test is almost the same test that I took some years ago with Tom. I certainly recall shooting it on a 8.5″x11″ sheet of paper, and I do believe we shot it at greater than 5 yards (tho if it was 7, 8, or 10, I don’t recall). Still, I think the closer distance and the smaller target, it all evens out.

All in all, I think this is an excellent drill.

Thank you, Tom, for the official write-up.

Why are you choosing and promoting ignorance?

The best way to reduce gun accidents is for everyone, not just gun owners, to learn the basics of gun safety.  Yet those in favor of “reasonable gun laws” object to any discussion of including the topic of gun safety in K-12 education, because those most qualified to give that instruction are certified by the NRA, and are therefore The Devil.  Houston just pulled the plug on using the Eddie Eagle safety program in schools for political reasons, even though the Eddie Eagle program is lecture only, does not advocate gun ownership and includes no hands-on time with firearms of any kind.  Invariably those objecting to the teaching of gun safety in school are the same ones that insist that sex education and giving out free condoms is essential because “some of them are going to have sex even though we tell them not to, so they need that instruction”. By the same logic, kids should get gun safety training, since “some of them are going to handle guns even though we tell them not to”.

– Karl Rehn

I was scrolling through my Facebook feed, saw one of those “your friend commented on a post” listings, it was Karl and some sort of “gun control” article, and the above is a copy/paste of one of the comments he made there.

It is very curious that guns are a topic people choose to be ignorant about, and promote willful ignorance of. Sure, you don’t have to be an encyclopedia like the TXGunGeek, and you can certainly hate guns and promote gun bans all you want. But just like abstinence-only education, you kinda have to know something about your topic if you wish to 1. talk about it with any authority (and be taken seriously), 2. to know what it is that you’re abstaining or avoiding. It’s why so many people cannot take priests seriously when they talk about sex or marriage… so you wonder why “pro gun folk” don’t take “anti gun folk” seriously when they talk about guns?

Some knowledge of basic “what to do if you find a gun?” is useful for everyone. Eddie Eagle teaches one simple thing:

  1. Stop
  2. Don’t Touch
  3. Leave the Area
  4. Tell an Adult

That’s it. The whole program is about impressing that mantra into a child’s head so when (if?) they run across a gun, they are going to know what to do: stop, don’t touch, leave the area, tell an adult.

If the child encounters a gun and doesn’t know what to do, what are they going to do? Who knows! That’s the problem. They might leave it alone, they might pick it up. If the child has no idea what to do, this is not a time for them to figure out how to fill in the blank. Or worse, should their idea of what to do with a gun be what they learned from TV? from movies? from YouTube videos? from your stupid redneck uncle? Can you honestly find fault with that 4-step mantra, and say you would not want your child — any child, every child — to know, practice, and enact it? Or are you too blinded by your hated of guns and the NRA?

They keep saying they want to save lives. That if it saves the life of just one child, then it’s worth it. Well, here’s your one:

A very well-informed fifth-grader at Oak Grove Elementary School reportedly followed procedure when he found a loaded gun on the playground at the school Friday.

[…]

Deputy Jay Lawson, the school’s Resource Officer teaches students throughout the year by using the “Eddie Eagle” safety program.

[…]

Just after 10 a.m. Friday, the fifth-grader found a loaded .22-magnum pistol laying near the swing set area on the playground at the school.

[…]

“He went straight down the line. The student identified the weapon, told others to get back away from it and yelled for a teacher,” Gault said. “One, two and three, just what he had learned.”

The gun was on the playground. It was loaded. The article reports it was a .22 Magnum American Arms, which are little derringers without a trigger guard — that is, if the child picked it up, likely he would have fired it. If the child had to tell others to back away, that means there were lots of kids out there playing (recess, I suppose). Yeah… it’s well likely a child could have tragically died that day, but thankfully at least this one child wasn’t suffering from ignorance. Worth it.

If the kids are older, or even for your adults, then a short course like the NRA’s Home Firearm Safety is more appropriate. It’s a classroom-only, non-shooting course. You learn about gun safety, you learn about the primary causes for gun accidents (ignorance, carelessness), a little bit about guns themselves (parts, nomenclature), how to safely and securely store guns, and probably most important — how to safely unload a gun. Consider the teacher on that playground, wouldn’t this knowledge be useful for them?

Please. If you care about “saving the children” as much as you claim, if you want to reduce the number of “senseless gun deaths”, then don’t accept nor force the children to be ignorant. You can campaign for gun bans. You can hate guns and the NRA all you want. But by the very nature of your fight, you will come in contact with guns, and the best thing you can do to keep from being one of the very statistics you wield is to learn how to be safe with guns.

Top 10 Reasons for Gun Violence

PoliceOne.com did an extensive survey on guns and gun violence, and as a part of that tried to ascertain what the causes are for the violence.

There’s no one answer, and this question was fairly divided with no overwhelming majority. But if you look at the reasons, a lot of it points back to our state of mind.

The degradation of our family and social structure, of kids growing up without much family so they look elsewhere for family… like to gang culture. Or the lack of parental filtering on things like TV, movies, music, and video games, to help a child put them into proper perspective.

We can even look at general social degradation, with how “news media” works to be another form of (morbid) entertainment, sensationalizing, driving and motivating copycats to achieve a higher body count so their names will be remembered forever.

Most shooters suffered from mental illness, but look at how we treat mental illness and those who suffer from it. And the prevalence of drugs like Xanax… it all goes together.

So really, much of it comes back to our state of mind.

Think about it.

We’ve had guns all along. We didn’t always have horrific shootings and violence. So guns are a common denominator in both situations, so we can factor it out. What are we left with? That’s where we should be looking.

Break your fixation – scan

Ever get fixated on something?

Notice how your fixation enables you to collect a lot of data about whatever you are fixated on? That’s good.

Notice how your fixation denies you data collection about everything else around you? Well, you probably didn’t notice because you were fixated on something. 🙂  And that’s potentially bad.

Of course, for fixation to be good or bad depends upon circumstance and context. In a personal defense context, it can be a bad thing. Why? Well, if you get fixated on one thing, missing out on others could cause you greater hurt.

For example, if you are driving and get fixated on the accident on the other side of the road, your rubbernecking may prevent you from noticing the car in front of you just stopped… and now you have your own accident as you rear-end the the car in front of you.

Or, you get focused on that one guy acting strange, and you don’t notice his buddy sneaking up from the other side to whack you on the head.

We get target-fixated. That’s a human thing to do. What we must do in response is realize when we are getting fixated and break the fixation.

Scanning is a fundamental tool to break fixation.

Think to yourself “SCAN! SCAN! SCAN!”. We yell this a lot during Defensive Pistol Skills 1 classes at KR Training. Notice it’s in a “level 1” defensive skills course. It’s that fundamental a skill. It’s that important to learn how to break your target fixation. It gets you off whatever you are fixated on and resumes your consumption of information from the world around you. It doesn’t stop paying attention to whatever you were fixated upon, it just resumes paying attention to other things as well because there may be something else that demands your attention. And then you’ll get fixated again, and then you’ll need to break that fixation again.

Scan. Scan. Scan.

What motivated me to write this was walking to the gym the other morning. It’s early morning, dark. It’s rare to see other people out, so when I saw this guy walking further up the road from me, of course it caught my attention and my guard went up. He was walking the same direction I was, so I didn’t feel any sort of immediate threat, but I paid attention. Then I broke attention and started to scan, because I felt myself getting fixated on him. He drifted to the other side of the road, and I did the opposite, working to keep distance between us. He kept slowing down, and tho that caused me to close distance (I kept my same pace), I realized he never once looked up, never once looked around despite the fact I was getting closer – my footsteps were obvious. Eventually he turned right, into a park, and kept on walking. Never once looked my way. And as I realized he was just some dude walking somewhere, I couldn’t help but think his total obliviousness to me could have been dangerous for him — what if it was some bad guy coming to mug him?

Then as I passed him I took one last look over at him as he was walking away… and I saw how fixated he was on his smartphone.

More grip help

When I wrote about ways to help improve grip for shooting, I forgot to mention a few things.

Extend the Index Finger

When we grip things in our daily life, we normally grip with our whole hand: all fingers and thumb involved. Think about how you’d grip a baseball bat or a hammer.

Of course, some things we might grip differently when we know we need a lighter grip, like how we might extend a pinky when we hold a champagne flute.

Think about how you grip a handgun. Your strong hand isn’t wrapped around the grip of the gun, but rather your index finger is extended. Where does your grip come from then? The last 3 fingers: middle, ring, pinky. Your weak/support hand may not extend its index finger, but still it’s grip must primarily come from those bottom fingers as well because it’s that pinky that really applies the counter-torque in grip technique.

Interestingly, this falls very well into the notion of “ki finger” (Google if you’re curious for more on that topic).

So when you work on your grip exercises, certainly work on whole-hand grip. But add variations where you extend your index finger (just point it straight out, like you’re making a “gun” with your hand/fingers) so you really add emphasis to your bottom 3 fingers in your grip work.

Mind Thumb Placement

When I’m at the gym, I no longer do direct work for my grip. It’s mainly an economy issue, because at least right now my grip is not something that back progress in my main lifts. I work to ensure I get grip work in everything I do where I can. That is, squats really won’t help with grip work, but deadlifts do. I get a lot of work on my grip when doing things like pull-ups and lat pulldowns. The trick is to ensure you are gripping hard and proper throughout the whole of that exercise; don’t let your fingers slip down to where they are barely hooking onto the bar, but grip and squeeze hard and make gripping part of the greater movement. Economy.

When you do this, try to see what you can do about your thumb placement. Now doing a max effort movement like a deadlift, you might just need to grip in whatever way is strongest. But when you’re doing assistance work, like say lat pulldowns, you can fiddle with your grip to work it. Note where your thumb wraps onto your fingers. If you’re like most people, your thumb likely overlaps your index and/or middle finger(s). This is a strong grip. Instead, try shifting your thumb over so it overlaps your ring or pinky finger. Try it right now. Make a fist with your thumb falling “naturally” over your index/middle finger and clench hard; feel where and what muscles tighten up. Relax, shift the thumb over to your ring finger, and clench again. Feels different? Different forearm muscles involved? That’s what you want: those wrist flexors.

A simple shift in where your thumb closes makes a difference. This isn’t to say that’s where the thumb should be placed when gripping the gun and shooting, but for strengthening purposes, it’s useful.