I named a drill!

Over at pistol-training.com, ToddG and Scott Warren of Warren Tactical were working on a new drill. Here’s the skinny:

Earlier this week, I [ToddG] was shooting with Scott Warren (of Warren Tactical) and we worked on something he’s adapted from one of Rob Leatham’s drills. It’s a pretty straightforward transition routine. You start withfour steel chest plates at a range of 10yd, spaced three yards apart. On the buzzer, draw and engage one shot per target back and forth for 20 rounds. Goal is 100% hits in less than 10 seconds. Note that you do not “double” the targets on the end, you shoot them once and then reverse direction. So the sequence is: T1-T2-T3-T4-T3-T2-T1-T2, etc. There are no makeup shots. If you miss a plate, it’s a miss … move on to the next plate.

Trouble is, the drill needed a name, so ToddG had a contest on the website to name it.

I posted my submission:

1. “Target Transition Drill”. Not a sexy name, but a practical one. Tells you exactly what the drill is about.

2. “4×20 Transitions Drill” (or “4×20 Target Transitions Drill”). Again tells you what’s going on, and can even open the door for variations to be made and appropriately labeled, e.g. 5×25, 3×10. Once you know the base drill (and name), it’s easy to perform variations on the drill by just calling out the numbers.

That’s all I’ve got for now.

I just got an email from ToddG saying that I won!

The drill is going to be known as the “4×20 Transition Drill”. I don’t know why the name was chosen (ToddG didn’t say), but I’d like to think it may have to do with my explanation. That is, once you know the drill, you can just change up the numbers (5×25, 3×10) and viola you have variations… as this drill was a variation on a Rob Leatham drill, it’s fitting.

Now that I think about it, I do wonder if the name should be revised slightly, e.g. “4x20x10” that is, 4 plates, 20 rounds, 10 seconds. But that’s up to Scott I guess.

Anyway, I won a set of Warren Tactical Glock sights. Now I just need a Glock to put them on! 🙂  I have been eyeing a G20.

Whoo!

Illusion of safety. Are you a fool or a wise man?

Previously I had posted a response to Rebecca’s feelings on guns. One thing she wrote:

Do I carry a gun in my house? Never. Do I believe in the right to bear arms? Yes. But I believe there should be stricter regulations. I believe that fear is the worst possible reason to carry a weapon and therefor will never understand why so many feel the need to “protect their families,” especially when housed in gated communities in middle-class suburbs, alarms activated.

John Farnam recounts a story of a couple who lived in an upscale, gated community in the “high-rent” part of town… and their house was broken into while the couple was at home, car stolen and wrecked, property stolen. In fact, they owned a gun but didn’t carry it. The biggest thing? Their illusion of safety was shattered. It’s a shame it took something horrible to get them to wake up. The incident could have been far worse. How does the saying go? Fools learn from their own mistakes, wise men learn from the mistakes of others? Are you a fool, or a wise man?

Score!

Older kiddos heading to a 4-H summer camp next week, so we had to do a little shopping. Wife recently dumped a bunch of our water bottles due to BPA concerns, so we needed to buy some new BPA-free ones.

While at the Academy, I had to stop by the gun counter.

Picked up a box of Remington Golden Bullet, the value pack (525 rounds… the “insta-arsenal”). It’s not my favorite .22 LR (I like the Federal Champion target bricks better), but it works better than things like Thunderbolt. I could only get 1 box, but hey… I’ve been searching for decent .22 LR for a while now so I’m happy. Whoo!

Who needs a new website?

Everyone’s all buzzing over the new Brownells website. I never found their old website all that bad, but it certainly wasn’t as sexy as the new one. Next time I need to shop for something they sell I certainly will give their website a more thorough look.

What I would like to see in a new website is one for Smith & Wesson. My quest for a snub-nose revolver continues, and I’m narrowing down what I want, but being able to do more direct comparisons would be really nice. Yeah they have some ways to “find what you want” but it’s just not as good as some other sites at helping you browse through their entire catalog, compare, and really figure what model is right for you.

What would also be really neat if S&W did was put their entire history online. A good used gun is a fine thing and finding a good used snub is just fine with me. It would be awesome if Smith had their entire historical catalog online. There’s just the cool history value of that, but it also would allow folks a one-stop repository to know about all past Smith & Wesson firearms to be able to research and say “yeah, a used such-and-such would fit my bill as well as a new such-and-such, or perhaps better”.

Ah well, just have to keep my Google-Fu high while I do my homework.

Let the numbers do the talking

Howard Nemerov looks at the Brady Campaign’s own data (along with some FBI data) examining how states with high “Brady Scores” also have larger police forces and also greater incidents of violent crime.

I thought more police == less crime. I mean, the police are there to protect us, right?

Those “right to carry” states…. there should be blood flowing on the streets, people solving all of their problems with guns.  They certainly shouldn’t have less police and lower violent crime. That’s unpossible!

But hey… the facts speak for themselves.

Criminals don’t want to get killed. When they know people could be armed, they tend to take a different course of action.

An observation

Funny how the “armed self-defense” approach is A-okay at the macro scale in HI, but Heavens forfend they should entertain the notion of plain citizens being armed to protect themselves from footpads and highwaymen, ooooo nooooo.

Roberta X

Is it worth dying for?

Kellene reminds us what a concealed handgun license is for.

I sympathize with the victim in many ways: a personal violation, taking of your stuff, being fed up with crime, being fed up with criminals and parasites. I’m hip to it all. But going after someone like this — chasing them down, shooting wildly into the air or ground — isn’t wise and is potentially asking for heap loads of trouble.

In any situation like this you have to ask yourself: is it worth dying for? If it’s not worth dying for, it’s not worth pulling your gun out for. Sure, you could run after these guys and try to get your stuff back, but unless you can answer “yes, this is worth dying for” keep your gun in the holster.

Micro-stamping, well-intended but useless

Via Sebastian I’m referred to a great article by The Arizona Rifleman on why microstamping is useless. Intentions may be good, but we know what paves the road to Hell, right?

The biggest issue is that if it’s aimed to stop crime or help police solve a crime, it just won’t do that. Either the criminal will avoid the microstamped guns, will modify their microstamped guns, or use microstamping to their advantage to cast someone else into the mix — likely an innocent person — and either frame them or just cause mounds of legal trouble for the innocent person. There’s just too much risk of problem and increased cost in this, and no benefit towards the desired goal.

If you can demonstrate a way to hurt the criminals and not hurt the law-abiding citizens, I’m all for it. But when the efforts do exactly the opposite, how can one lobby for their support? unless I guess you like helping criminals and hurting law-abiding folk.

Don’t fear the sun

Linoge made a comment on my  posting “I’m not so sure about that“. As I wrote a reply I realized that what I had to say warranted a full-on blog posting. So here it is.

Wife and I have chosen to homeschool our kids. Why? Numerous reasons, but the key ones are the public school system sucks and we’re not rolling in enough dough to consider private school. I went to public schools all my life, Wife was in private Catholic schools. While I think my public school experience wasn’t too bad, I have heard from old friends with younger siblings how the same top-notch schools we went to have degraded. Due to things like “No Child Left Behind” concerns are less on true education and more on test scores. I know all too well how you can get an “A” on a test and walk out of the classroom knowing nothing (no cheating involved, it’s just about working/gaming the test and not on gaining true education and knowledge). So when Oldest was an infant and we started to think about our schooling choices, homeschooling wasn’t something we had ever thought about but the more we researched the option the more it appealed to us. Every year we reevaluate our options and approach because the bottom line is we want the best for our children and if situations change and there’s a better avenue, we’ll take it. So far no better avenue has surfaced and we continue to homeschool our children.

Of course, whenever you mention the word “homeschooling” to someone, the Pavlovian response is “But what about socialization?”. The “S” word. Socialization takes on a different meaning these days and frankly that’s socialization we can do without. And certainly homeschoolers can be a little bitter about the FAQs we’re constantly hit with. But if there is one thing I’m well aware of it is that my children can be sheltered due to homeschooling. Since they are not surrounded by those of their age group for 8 hours a day every day, there’s no question my children don’t receive the “socialization” that kids attending public or private school receive. In part that is one reason for homeschooling, because we can exert more control and influence over our children, who they are exposed to, what influences them. Remember that not all influences are good ones, and even with our controls our kids still get exposed to bad ones (Oldest had a bully situation at a summer camp last year). But I know that my job with my children is to provide them with the skills and knowledge that enables them to not just survive but thrive in the world. My children are only spending a short time with me; most of their life and time is going to be spent as an adult in the real world, so they need to know how to work with the real world — which includes knowing how the real world is, good and bad and ugly. To truly shelter my children is not doing them any sort of service.

I admit that you shouldn’t expose your children to all things, or at least that you have to be mindful of when and how to expose them. There is something about making things age-appropriate and ensuring the child has the maturity and capability to understand and handle what you’re doing. Let’s take guns as an example. There’s not much reason to introduce an infant to guns, but as soon as infant is able to be mobile (about 6 months, crawling stage), you as a responsible parent and gun owner must take steps to secure your firearms because that infant will get into everything and knows nothing and no amount of attempting to teach them about guns is going to help. As your child gets older and can understand what guns are about, even if they cannot fathom death, it can be reasonable to start to introduce things to them. For instance, if you’re watching cartoons and Bugs Bunny puts his carrot into the muzzle-end of Elmer Fudd’s shotgun and Elmer just gets a blackened face, it’s worthwhile to start explaining to your child the difference between fantasy and reality. Then when you think your child is able to handle more regarding guns, you can expose them as you wish. Look at Kathy Jackson’s articles on Kids and Guns for some excellent writings on the topic. If nothing else, and certainly when kids are at a younger age, you should introduce them to Eddie Eagle. His message of “Stop. Don’t touch. Leave the area. Tell an adult.” teaches nothing about gun handling, but a lot about keeping kids safe if they encounter a gun.

Do my children know about guns? Certainly. I make guns no mystery to them, and frankly this has caused them to think of guns as rather mundane with little appeal. I think that’s a good thing as there’s no forbidden fruit syndrome to make guns enticing. Do I care about teaching them defensive uses of firearms? No, not at this point. Right now I just teach them safety rules, marksmanship, fundamentals, and most of all to just have fun. Sometimes if something comes up, sure I’ll discuss it, but it’s not hypercritical at this point to give them intensive defensive handgunning 101. But basic ways to stay safe? Sure. Things like the InSights ABC’s (Always Be Cool). To be aware of surroundings and trust your gut. And certainly other more specific things get taught, just not some intensive course like I might enjoy taking. The reality is that shit happens, and if the shit happens to my kids I want to ensure they’re able to return home. The thought of not being able to hold and hug my child is most unappealing to me, and it’s my duty and responsibility as a parent to ensure they have every skill and bit of knowledge possible to ensure their success in life.

I don’t live my life in fear, and I do my best to encourage my children to do the same. Yes they have fears, but I teach them true ways of being empowered to conquer those fears. Allow and accept the fears to happen, face them, let them pass over and through you, learn to control them, and channel them to your advantage. I remember when my kids first climbed a ladder and they’d only go up a few steps, but then the day came when they climbed to the top and gleefully shouted “Dad look! I did it!” Small thing perhaps, but the lesson is they were afraid of the height, of the new experience, but they didn’t let the fear stop them and in the end they conquered their fear. This has enabled Oldest to enjoy having the upper bunk-bed; how life is better when you don’t live in fear, eh?

You only have so much time and so much energy in life, why expend it on fear? How much life can you enjoy? Fear is what leads to sheltering, and while I won’t say it’s not justified, if you’re always stuck in the shelter you never get to see the sun and all the beauty that comes from it.