Texas CHL Caliber Restriction

Via Bob S. I get to meet a couple Cranky Chicks with Guns.

Just so happens they too are in Texas, and in visiting their blog for the first time their current post is regarding Texas CHL and Caliber Restrictions. Sarah asserts:

However, the State of Texas also interferes with CHL holders when it comes time to select a carry gun. You must, to be legal, carry at least a .32 caliber. Yes. Really.

I am not a lawyer and this is certainly the first time I’ve heard anyone consider this notion. But my reading of the Texas CHL laws, specifically GC §411.188 “Handgun Proficiency Requirement”:

An applicant many not be certified unless the applicant demonstrates, at a minimum, the degree of proficiency that is required to effectively operate a handgun of .32 caliber or above.

So as far as I can tell, the .32 caliber minimum only pertains to the qualification portion of the licensing process. I don’t believe it pertains to actual carrying. My guess is this may be done to avoid people qualifying with a little gun then going out and carrying a big gun they can’t handle… some way to “work the system” and thus partake in potentially dangerous activity. That’s just my guess as to the reasoning behind the restriction. But as far as I can tell, you could qualify with a big gun then carry a little gun.

Nevertheless, it’s still a good point being raised. What if all you can handle is a .22 pistol? Maybe age or a medical condition limits your ability. Why should those people be denied?

I’m going to ask a few people about this. I’ll post responses when/if I get them.

Updated: Asked a few knowledgeable people and confirmed that yes, there is nothing pertaining to caliber when it comes to carrying. Yes there’s the .32 minimum for the proficiency requirement of the licensing process, but that’s all.

Male priorities

What does it say about my male priorities when I look at the Locked and Loaded Ladies 2010 calendar (SFW so long as SFW means bikini-clad babes with guns), and the first thing I focus on isn’t just the guns but the unsafe gun-handling by the models? Almost all have fingers on the trigger, lots of unsafe muzzle directions too (October is doubly bad).

I’ll tell you what it says.

It says that I like guns, I like safe gun handling, and I think my wife is the hottest woman on the planet. 🙂

(h/t to The ArmsVault)

Pretend ‘Gun-Free’ School Zones: A Deadly Legal Fiction

David Kopel’s latest article is published in the Connecticut Law Review. Electronic version available here. The abstract:

 

Most states issue permits to carry a concealed handgun for lawful protection to an applicant who is over 21 years of age, and who passes a fingerprint-based background check and a safety class. These permits allow the person to carry a concealed defensive handgun almost everywhere in the state. Should professors, school teachers, or adult college and graduate students who have such permits be allowed to carry firearms on campus?

In the last two years, many state legislatures have debated the topic. School boards, regents, and administrators are likewise faced with decisions about whether to change campus firearms policies.

This Paper is the first to provide a thorough analysis of the empirical evidence and policy arguments regarding licensed campus carry. Whether a reader agrees or disagrees with the Paper’s policy recommendations, the Paper can lay the foundation for a better-informed debate, and a more realistic analysis of the issue.

 

Seattle Gun Ban Goes To Court

Seattle Mayor, Greg Nickels, enacted a city-level ban on guns in public places such as public city parks. The problem here is the Mayor is attempting to have city law preempt state law, which it cannot. Even the Washington State Attorney General says this doesn’t hold water.

Consequently, a lawsuit has now been filed.

 

Ruth Bowman of the Seattle City Attorney’s office, said the city’s policy was put in place to protect “our most vulnerable and defenseless citizens, our children.”

 

Ah, they played the “won’t someone think of the children” card. So explain to me how putting law-abiding parents at a disadvantage does anything to enable those parents to protect their children. It’s not like criminals are going to obey this city ordinance, and the criminals are the ones you need to protect your children from. Or did you forget what sort of person might carry a concealed handgun? Carrying a gun does not automatically equal bad evil dangerous person. Yes bad people carry guns, but good people do too… precisely because we know there are bad people out there.

Coyote Attack

It’s rare for coyotes to attack a human, let alone even get so close. But it can happen.

Take home point is it’s good to be carrying something that can contend with critters, especially if you’re out in the backcountry. I’m still in the market for a good such gun, probably a .44 Mag revolver at this point but still undecided (not much point in making a final decision until the budget permits). In the front-country (i.e. city), OC spray can be useful here.

Why Always?

During the Thanksgiving holiday, most of my family will be visiting me in my home. This will be the first time I’ll be around my parents and siblings since I received my concealed handgun license. While they all know I have a CHL, this will be their first experience with it, and my family members are at various places along the spectrum with regards to guns. While I might normally open carry within my home on a normal day, during their entire visit I will carry concealed. Nevertheless, I know one thing likely to cause them to notice:

Hugging, or otherwise touching, me (e.g. taking my arm as we walk).

With a gun on the right and a magazine-flashlight pouch on the left, given how tall I am and how short everyone else is, it’s inevitable someone is going to bump into things. It will be felt, it will be noticed, “What’s that?”, and discussion will ensue. Some family members will have brief discussions, others will likely dwell on it the entire visit and much explanation and justification will have to occur (you open carry advocates that don’t understand why I don’t want to deal with the hassle? you haven’t met my Mom). 😉

That’s what inspired me to write today.

Why always?

I remember when I received my first Leatherman, a Micra. Those of you with small kids may have noticed when you go out to eat, the kid gets a small drink but the straws are all sized for larger drink cups. So now you have small child, with small arms, and a very tall straw that they struggle to get to their lips. Gosh if we just had a pair of scissors! One Father’s Day the Micra was a gift from Wife so I could trim the straws. 🙂  From then on I always carried it on me.

There was also a time, and I don’t recall if this was before or after the Micra but probably before, on Christmas Day. Much opening of presents, which means much battling with packaging. Child comes wanting me to help open something, but there were lots of zip ties. I needed a knife but didn’t have one. My brother-in-law reached into his pocket, pulled out a pocket knife, called Child over and opened things. I felt a little deficient as a father, and vowed that wouldn’t happen again. Currently this role is filled by my Leatherman Wave, which is always in its sheath on my belt.

I never carried any sort of illumination on me, not even a little cheap LED fob on my keychain. Usually I got around OK in the dark, but whenever I really needed light I would go in search of a flashlight. Of course, it was always amusing when the lights would suddenly go out in the house at night, then you make your way to where you think the flashlight should be but someone didn’t put it back in the proper place when they were done with it and now you’re cussing as you try to fumble in the dark looking for a source of light. In speaking with Karl some time ago he told me how he always carries some sort of light on him. I bought a SureFire E2L and have been carrying it ever since. Used to just keep it clipped to a pocket (usually back left), but now I have a dedicated place for it on my belt. You don’t think about how useful a flashlight can be to have on you until you have one on you and can use it when you need it.

That’s the crux of this: tools are useful if you have need for them, then have them handy when you need them.

Tools are devices that facilitate performing a task. I could drive a nail into a board with my hand, but it’d be rather difficult to accomplish. I could use a shoe or a rock or something else as a make-shift tool, and that would facilitate the task more than my bare hand, but nowhere near as well as a proper tool for the job like a hammer.

I am a software developer by trade. Consequently in my daily life I don’t need a hammer. Sometimes I need a hammer, to hang a picture or to repair something, and when I do need a hammer it’s not a big inconvenience to go to the garage and get the hammer out of my toolbox. Certainly going to the garage is more convenient than going to ask a neighbor or having to visit a store to buy or rent one. To always carry a hammer on my person would be very convenient but given how infrequently I need a hammer and how it’s rarely an emergency item, it doesn’t make much sense for me to always carry a hammer. Thus storing the hammer in the garage is handy enough for me. For a professional carpenter, always having to go to the garage would be problematic, thus a carpenter is likely to wear a specialized toolbelt so the hammer can be stored there and thus always at the carpenter’s fingertips while they work their day on the jobsite.

As we can see, tools are good things because they facilitate our performing a task. But for the tool to be useful we need to be performing a relevant task, thus having need for that particular tool. Then what increases the utility of the tool is for it to be handy and present when we need it.

I don’t know when I’m going to have to cut something open, but I do it enough times that my life is made easier by always carrying/wearing my Leatherman Wave. Package comes in the mail, I can instantly cut it open without having to go seek out a knife to cut the packaging tape. A few weeks ago when I was installing shelves in my garage I was up on the ladder working and needed a screwdriver; I could have gotten down off the ladder and went to the toolbox, but instead I just reached onto my belt for my Leatherman and kept right on working. If I need to go outside at night, it’s mostly illuminated but perhaps I have to walk through an area that’s a bit dark and I want to ensure I’m not stepping on a rattlesnake (they occasionally appear in the yard); it’s nice to have that flashlight on me right then and there, not having to go back inside, fetch the light, then resume my work. I’ve been through many experiences were having the Leatherman or the flashlight or some other thing on me at the time opportunity knocked proved to be best. Sure every situation is different, everyone has different needs and tolerance levels. This is what works for me.

Consider things that aren’t necessarily tools but that you might carry with you every day. You carry your wallet, which holds credit cards, drivers license, money. You may not always need those things, but you’re happy to have them there when you do. Doesn’t it suck when you go to pay for something then realize you left your wallet in the car or at home? Maybe you carry a comb or a brush. You want to ensure you look your best, but it’s a bummer when the wind blows your hair and now all you can use is use your fingers in hopes of fixing your do. Maybe you carry breath mints, because making that first impression on the cutie that just appeared across the way goes over better if your breath doesn’t smell like the garlic and onion bagel you just ate. We carry certain things on us because we expect we may need them at some time; we may not know exactly when, but we expect we will and  life is facilitated when we have them on hand at the time of need.

So why do I (almost) always carry a gun?

Because it can be a useful tool. No, I’m not talking useful in a Homer Simpson way. This is one of those situations where there isn’t a daily need. In fact, it’s one of those instances where I actually hope I never have a need for it. But it’s also one of those instances where if I ever do have a need for it, I’m going to need it right now and be rather thankful I have it so handy. As the saying goes, you don’t want it until you need it, but when you need it you need it really really bad. Look at Caleb’s recent experience. He didn’t know he needed it until he needed it, and when he needed it he was thankful it was handy.

I don’t know when I will need to physically defend myself, but I expect some day I might. I may train in empty-hand martial arts, I may train with stick and knives, but I know a gun is a superior tool for the task. I carry these useful tools with me because if I expect I may someday need them, I do know if I ever need it it will only be useful to me if it’s handy when I need it. Being at my side keeps it handy. I cannot predict when that need may come, thus I have to fall back on the old Boy Scout training to Be Prepared.

Breda is often quoted because she’s right: carry your gun — it’s a lighter burden than regret.

 

Even more open carry thoughts

Sebastian has been one of the gun bloggers discussing open carry a great deal in recent days.

Earlier today I wrote a bit more about my own thoughts on open carry and how I’m just not into it for myself because I don’t carry to make a political statement. Now Sebastian writes on a critical question that comes up in this discussion:

Ride Fast has a question:

What I would like to hear from Mr. Cramer and others who support not openly carrying, is just how do we acclimate people to open carry without actually open carrying? Or is Mr. Cramer advocating we give up on open carry altogether? I can’t support that and never will.

I would ask why acclimating people to open carry is an important goal for the gun rights movement? Because doing that really only benefits the small number of people who want to openly carry. To me that’s a step 36 thing, when we’re on step 12.

Now you have to back up and look at Ride Fast’s post. But frankly he answers his own question and Sebastian furthers it.

Dramatic change is not going to work. People just don’t like change, or perhaps better is to say that most people don’t like big changes really quickly — especially a change that could invoke negative feelings (like seeing a gun on someone’s hip). Recent years have been very big on anti-gun, but it is slowly changing. Heck, in the past year a lot has changed in that regard and many more people are warming up to guns and gun owners. But taking giant leaps into open carry just may not work for the masses. Again, it’s well likely to scare the sheep.

Case in point, as soon as I posted my earlier bit, a buddy of mine posted an experience he had at a local bank. And he wasn’t open carrying at all. Heck, it sounds like it was possible they went purely on the knowledge that he had a concealed handgun license. And folks, this is in Texas.

I just don’t think the sheep, on the whole, are ready for us to jump into open carry.

But now we have Bushmaster putting ads in Maxim magazine. Savage Arms advertising in Boys’ Life magazine.

So this is how you do it. Like Ride Fast said, it was a slow haul through advertising and other avenues. Honda started an ad campaign. Kinda like Bushmaster with Maxim, eh? It’s a slow process of allowing the mainstream to see us and think nothing of it all.

Sebastian continues along the lines I also feel, that if you’re open carrying to make a political point, it’s a passive show and the message received by the viewer may not be the message you wish to convey. I know Ron’s a good guy, but the man at the bank did not and assumed the worst. It’s better to be able to engage people actively, so you can explain, so they can ask questions and you can answer and ensure they are receiving the message you’re trying to send.

So should we not open carry at all in the meantime? No. To some degree you still have to have it out in the open. Just realize that that avenue is going to be a rough road and cannot be the only road. I’m happy to discuss things with people. When I go to the gun range, I have to walk outside with my guns and range bag to load them into my car and I’m sure neighbors have seen me. You shouldn’t hide what or who you are, but on the same token, like anything else, we have to be mindful about flaunting it in front of others. You don’t win people to your way of thinking by rubbing their noses in something they have a problem with.

Updated: OK. Yeah… Linoge gets the win here. 🙂  I’ve been swayed, at least enough to go back and think about it more, as it pertains to open carry as a political statement and then how I personally wish to conduct myself with regards to carrying openly.

Thank God She Had A Gun

A serial rapist.

Let me repeat that again.

A serial rapist.

Raping elderly women.

Law enforcement officials suspect a home invasion in Leon County is connected to a serial rapist who has been terrorizing elderly women in rural areas of Texas for months.

On Saturday, police say a man broke into the home of an 81-year-old woman.

The woman had a handgun and managed to fire several shots, scaring the man away.

Full details here.

A more detailed account of the string of sexual assaults here.

But of course, we should ban guns. They can only do bad and horrible things. Old widows? They don’t need equalizers. There is no such thing as self-defense for all.

And I guess the only reason that 81-year-old woman had a gun was to compensate for the size of her penis.

</sarcasm>

Thinking more with open carry

Due to various things I’ve been very behind on my RSS feeds and have been catching up this morning.

Seems there’s still a lot of talk about open carry going on, whether it’s good to do or not.

I admit, since my last post about open carry, I’ve been doing it a bit more… in public. I should say that I more or less open carry around the house. I’m in the privacy of my own home, I’m wanting to be comfortable, Wife and Kids don’t consider it anything special or more different from wearing a pair of socks or seeing me with my hair in a pony tail. But any time I would have to go outside, even to take the trash out, I’d always throw something on or I’d untuck my shirt or something to cover up. Since that last post I opted to try it a bit, so when I’d take the trash out or do some small task in the yard I’d go outside without covering up.

Nothing happened. I figure because most every time I had the fortune of there being no one else outside. Or it was dark. Or a few times there was someone walking by but somehow I was covered, either with a garment or maybe I was carrying something that happened to obscure my holstered gun.

But every time I went outside, every time I did see someone on the street or some car drove by… it nagged at me.

I’ve come to realize.

To open carry at this stage? It veers upon making a political statement. I don’t carry to make a political statement. I carry because I know there’s bad people in this world and there are better tools than coffee.

I don’t need nor want to frighten the sheep. Why bear my teeth? I have the teeth if I need it, but I don’t need to be flashing those pearly white (grips) all the time. I’m here to protect the sheep, not frighten them. Some sheep may not flinch, but some will. It’s a fine line to walk and balance on. I have enough stuff to deal with in a day and I just don’t need the potential hassle.

If I want to get political, there are other avenues and venues for that, and I’m certainly active in those ways. Does that mean I’m against open carry? Heck no. I do believe the legal restrictions should be lifted. I just realize that, at least for now, open carry is not for me.