I have an elderly neighbor (she’s in her 80’s). She’s capable: she totally lucid, drives herself where she needs to go, and you can tell she’s got her pride — she wants to be self-sustaining and not be a burden on anyone. We do help her out as she needs, but again you can tell she does NOT want to burden anyone and only comes to us for help when she’s exhausted all options. I respect that, and am always happy to help her out when she asks.
But let’s face facts. She’s in her 80’s. She moves slow. She’s fairly frail.
She is vulnerable.
I admit, I think about her vulnerability. Some days ago I was over at her house helping her set up one of those “medical alert” systems. She knows her state in life (thus why she got the system for herself). But it still weighs on me. I often find myself thinking about her vulnerability, and if there’s anything I can do to alleviate it.
Then I step back and think about greater issues.
Our neighborhood has recently had a rash of break-ins. Thankfully it’s mostly been cars, but I do know from time to time homes are broken into.
I cringe at the thought of her home getting broken into. And let’s face it. Most break-ins are not random. The criminal has stalked and monitored and determined ahead of time what houses are good targets.
What can she do? Some 16-35 year old male breaks into her home. How vulnerable she is. What can she do in the face of such a threat?
She’s not like Mayor Bloomberg, with her own “private army”, which she can enjoy in her own retirement. She’s not so privileged as to have to have a security detail. What can she do?
There’s so much big talk about “leveling the playing field” in so many other areas of life, but what about here when life itself is at stake?
Anti-gun mantras ring hollow with me. If you’re going to throw worn arguments at me, I say you should look her in the eye and tell her the same. Think about how your actions to deny our society’s most vulnerable citizens with a means of an equalizer actually serve to hurt them more than help them.
Because that’s what a gun is: a force equalizer.
It allows folks like her to tell some evil person bent on hurting her, on destroying her life, to stop and go away.
Can you look her in the eye and deny her?
I’ll even take pro-gun folks to task.
There’s so much rah-rah about guns, calibers, and what’s acceptable for personal defense. It’s not just internet message board bravado, but it’s even things like how Texas law requires a certain “big caliber gun” (.32 caliber or greater) to pass the CHL test. You could carry a .22, but you can’t test with it. Yes, I understand why they required things in this way… but it still kinda bothers me.
I think about my frail neighbor.
Could she fire such a gun?
Pull that trigger weight?
Manage that level of recoil?
I don’t know, but given what I’ve seen of her frailty, I’m not sure.
But because of her condition in life, why should she be denied?