Hot damn. Nebraska’s LB 430 is now law.
Now they need to get reciprocity rolling.
Hot damn. Nebraska’s LB 430 is now law.
Now they need to get reciprocity rolling.
A friend of mine lives in California, but he’s not your stereotypical Californian.
This morning we were chatting and he was telling me all about California’s current financial clusterfuck. His summary:
California is the demonstration of unchecked liberal good intentions.
He refers to this article by George Will.
And you would think the folks in Washington might want to pay attention and learn, but you know that won’t happen.
While driving to Houston the other day I heard a commercial on the radio that was going on about “free”.
You know what folks? Nothing is truly free these days. For this, I’m talking “free” as in beer (not as in speech).
JR has an entry covering the state of some gun legislation in Texas, including the concealed carry on campus bills.
He’s right about the need to inform, because I do believe a large reason for the bills not happening was massive amounts of misinformation, just like he points out in his article.
So to begin with that, let me remind folks of what it takes to obtain a CHL in Texas.
And also note that this isn’t just about college students, but the employees of the college as well.
Breda recounts her experience getting through airport “security”.
So let’s see… anger, humiliation, degeneration… but hey, it’s all to make us feel safe, right? Don’t you feel safe? I sure feel safe. And that’s all that really matters: that we feel safe. Doesn’t matter that we also feel humiliated. It’s a small price to pay, else you’re not a patriot, right?
Yeah… we’re all presumed guilty until proven innocent. You pass through airport “security” and you are a suspect, until the beeping stops and the TSA folk deem you not to be… maybe. How American.
Somewhere a Founding Father or two continue to roll over in their graves.
*sigh*
Updated: Courtesy of Joe Huffman, a great article on Penn & Teller and how they mix their magic and their politics to make quite a good point.
Updated 2: Breda’s tale continues. Part II, and Part III. Gosh, I hope you’re feeling safe now folks. “Feeling” safe being the operative word.
Updated 3: Even more stories of safety, this time from Michael Bane.
I travel to Nebraska on occasion, so seeing the passage of LB 430 is welcome. Joe has the details.
What I’m looking for is reciprocity. Texas honors Nebraska’s license, it’ll be nice for Nebraska to honor Texas’.
Update: LB 430 isn’t law yet. It’s passed out of the legislature and is headed to the Governor’s desk for his signature, which I’m pretty sure he’ll sign.
On the surface, I’m pleased with this. Evil by definition doesn’t follow the rules. We good, well-intended folk might draw a line somewhere and say “sorry, you can’t cross this” and other good, well-intended folk will obey that… but evil won’t. When people go hiking in the backwoods of our national parks and risk running across people engaged in illegal activity (e.g. illegal drug operations, such as marijuana cultivation), those criminals tend to shoot first and ask no questions at all. Why should we good folk be disadvantaged, and forcefully so, by the laws that we cherish and obey?
If the measure becomes law “it would not only put park visitors and wildlife at risk, it would change the character and the peaceful and safe atmosphere in our parks,” [Bryan Faehner, associate director of the National Parks Conservation Association, an advocacy group that opposes guns in parks] said.
So tell me how visitors are not already at risk? Tell me how evil is already warded off and parks are 100% safe havens. And wildlife will be at risk? How? This law only permits lawful concealed carry of a handgun by a segment of the population that are statistically more law-abiding that your average citizen. So now they’re going to break hunting and other game laws? I mean, you can hunt in national parks, per hunting laws, which means wildlife isn’t any more or less at risk because of this. How is this going to change? Oh that’s right… once you put a gun in someone’s hand they turn into bloodthirsty killers bent on shooting everything they see. The law no longer applies. We’re above the law! MUHAHAHA! That’s right… I forgot. Silly me. 🙄 Gosh, and you’d think that with all the years of data we have regarding concealed carry would mean something… the fears of OK Corral shootouts and how the streets would be flowing with blood… gosh, none of that has yet come to pass; in fact, violent crime went down. Golly gosh jeepers, what to do.
But while I’m happy to see this, I’m not happy to see how it’s being done. It’s being attached as an amendment to a credit card reform bill. This is a bill that many feel needs to pass into law, given our current economic climate. So attaching this amendment — which has nothing to do with the bill — really doesn’t fly with me. The bill is one that needs to become law and likely will, which is part of the (sneaky) strategy in putting the amendment on this very bill. This strategy is sneaking the concealed carry stuff in through the back door, with a high chance that will allow it to become law (no line-item veto, so we’ll have to see how it fairs in committee when House and Senate reconcile). Folks, we bitch when people do this about things we don’t favor, so we need to bitch even when they do things in our favor. We can’t like the backdoor when it favors us and dislike it when it doesn’t.
Updated: Yea! It’s nice to see another gun blogger with mixed emotions over this one. It’s really interesting to watch most of your “pro gun blogs” out there, that bitch and moan about such legislative tactics, but now that the tactic is favoring them are oddly silent on the tactic and all happy to see legislation favoring them.
Louisiana is a step closer to allowing concealed carry on campus. Here’s hoping it makes it.
“Guns and campuses simply do not mix,” [Higher Education Commissioner Sally Clausen] said. “This is not a 2nd Amendment right; this is a safety issue.”
It’s exactly a safety issue. If being safe is a matter of keeping people from harm, please tell me how “gun free zones”, such as college campuses, keep people from harm? There’s no invisible shield surrounding the campus keeping the evil out. We’ve got years of data showing that once you allow concealed carry, violent crime goes down. Where’s your data showing otherwise? We’ll be waiting.
…then it’s worth it, right?
Read the story of Nicole Goeser (via Linoge).