Less police to protect you

Austin’s facing some budget issues and consequently that is going to mean fewer cops on the street:

[President of Austin’s Police Association, Sgt. Wayne] Vincent said postponing the [cadet] class will keep about 90 new officers off the streets for at least two years.

Ninety new officers off the streets… for the next two years… at least… could be more than two years.

Even if the police were bound to protect you, with less and less police and more and more population, it makes their job a lot harder.

Since the police will now have less chance of being around to protect you, who do you think is around you enough to be able to protect you? Hint: you.

If you don’t want to risk being a victim, take steps to give yourself the mindset and skills to minimize your chances of it happening, and if it does, of ensuring you come out of the altercation intact.

Taking a stand

Exodus takes a stand. Pass it on. Let’s make it a movement and make it very clear, especially to public companies like Ruger and Smith & Wesson. But not just them; remember what happened with H-S Precision and Cooper Firearms.

If we the people wish to keep our freedom, authority, and power, then we need to keep exercising it.

Permission

Just as Mr. Saxton and I do not need to be professional journalists to exercise our First Amendment rights, responsible civilians should not require official permission to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Alan Tong

(h/t to SayUncle)

 

Lissa’s crude analogy

The problem with Lissa’s crude analogy is that it makes sense. That’s precisely why it falls upon deaf ears and so many people think big(ger) government is the way to solve our problems. *sigh*

It’s what you give

Over at 2AMusing, the subject of pink guns came up. I pointed out what Smith & Wesson had done with their pink gun. And I like how Caleb put it:

While Josh Sugarmann of VPC takes donations to pay his six figure salary, a gun company donates a portion of their profits to help save lives.  Do you really wonder who the good guys are here?

Indeed.

Oh NOW you realize this

First news story I read this morning is about Waco Dodge protesting the closure of Chrysler dealerships.

“This is mostly to say that the bailout didn’t work and there’s still people losing their jobs,” Waco Dodge General Manager Holly Dunham said.

It didn’t work? People are still losing jobs? That’s unpossible! Those “good” folks in Washington told us this wouldn’t happen if we just allowed them to flush everything down the toilet.

Though some in attendance say they don’t doubt the government had good intentions, the bailout didn’t work.

Hell is paved with good intentions.

“The taxation of the youth that’s coming up, they’re going to be paying for this big bill,” [Protester Wes] Hardin said.

This wasn’t realized months ago when all this bailout fiasco first raised up?

But for dealership employees, their dissatisfaction stems from government intervention.

“The government is involved in as much as there is a task force, the automotive task force who’s dictating the terms of Chrysler’s bankruptcy and telling them what they need to do and how they need to do it,” Dunham said.

She said Chrysler was told by the task force to cut back on their dealerships.

The government sticking their noses into everything. Yes, it’s always the positive and fruitful solution. What happened to “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” being the scariest words in the English language?

Dunham said before the bailout money got involved, a better alternative would have been for Chrysler to leave it up to the dealerships to stay open because naturally the economy would have forced some doors to close, and profitable dealers could have stayed open.

You mean let the free markets work things out? Gosh, what a concept.

To be fair, I do get the feeling those directly involved in this (the particular dealership owners, employees, etc.) actually have a clue that this bailout stuff was a sham from the get go. But to those that thought bailouts would solve things, that the government is the answer (not the cause) of all our problems, I offer up Exhibit A.

Gun buy-backs exposed

You know the drill… gun “buy-back” programs, where you trade in a gun and in return get something (e.g. a gift card). It’s all an effort to get guns off the streets and keep children safe.

Want to know the truth?

Basically, it’s worthless. Sure it collects a lot of guns, but almost all the guns collected are junk, inoperable, rusted out buckets of worthlessness. That is, it cost the collectors (ultimately you, the taxpayer) a lot of money to dish out these gift cards, and in return nothing of use was done. It makes someone in the PR department feel good, but that’s all we are now… about feeling good, not about actually accomplishing anything.

I also find it highly amusing. What do they think they’re going to get? Do they really thing the drug dealers and the gang members are going to go “Golly! I can trade in my gun and get a $100 gift card. Gee, Beav, what a deal! I think I’ll go do that right now! Golly!”

An Open Letter to President Obama

 
The author, Lou Pritchett, is a well-known public speaker who retired after a successful 36-year career as the VP World Sales for Proctor and Gamble.

Lou Pritchett
Foremost Leader in Change Management

Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America ‘s true living legends- an acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world’s highest rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize him as the foremost leader in change management. Lou changed the way America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to be known as “partnering.” Pritchett rose from soap salesman to Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and Gamble and over the course of 36 years, made corporate history.

AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA

Dear President Obama:

You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me..

You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.

You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.

You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don’t understand it at its core.

You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming others.

You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.

You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America ‘ crowd and deliver this message abroad.

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector..

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.

You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.

You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.

You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics against certain banks and corporations.

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.

You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do..

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O’Relllys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.

Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.

Lou Pritchett

And apparently, it’s legit.

Low powered rifle

While reading this article over at SailorCurt’s, it hit me.

We don’t see many “low powered rifles” … not many “medium powered rifles”. How about “extra-high powered”?  “medium-high powered”? “medium-low”? “extreme high powered”?

Of course, would the main-stream-media and hoplophobes know the difference?