Yup. Homosexuality is a threat to the sanctity of “traditional” marriage.

See? We have proof!

Adultry? Nah…. just the fags. They’re the ones screwing up marriage. Obviously.

*eyeroll*

I know this will probably annoy some of my more conservative readers, but that’s how I feel about it. I don’t see why people who love each other and wish to be committed to each other should be denied such things. I fail to see how homosexuals threaten “traditional marriage” and I fail to see what is gained by denying homosexuals the ability to marry. As you can see by Sen. Koch’s behavior well… if she’s so concerned about protecting the sanctity of marriage, why did she violate it? The fags sure didn’t make her do it, did they?

In the end, it’s pretty simple. They’re not infringing upon my life. I am not being injured by people making life-long commitments to each other. I am leaving them alone to live their life, and only ask they leave me alone to live my life. It isn’t my thing, but there’s a lot of things in the world that aren’t my thing and there are a lot of things in my life that aren’t someone else’s thing; is that justification enough to ban and deny things? They had no say in whom I chose to marry, and I’d be pretty upset if someone opted to stick their nose into my business and tell me who I could or could not marry. Don’t tread on me. Treat people as you’d want to be treated. All that good stuff.

Plus I just find it disingenuous to say they’re passing these “sanctity of marriage” laws, when they are nothing but a means to legally discriminate against homosexuals. If you really want to protect marriage, then work to protect it. Maybe outlaw divorce. Maybe make adultery illegal… oh wait….