Not what but how

Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) or Traditional Martial Arts (TMA). Sport systems vs. reality-based systems. When it comes to picking a martial art, which is better? It’s a debate that fuels many an Internet forum.

When I was reading Low Tech Combat’s 25 Best Comments of 2010, a couple of the best comments came from a posting LTC did about TMA vs. Modern Systems. A couple snippets of those comments.

From Marc G.

I agree as well. There is something of value in many of the martial arts. And they all have their strengths and shortcomins. There is nothing wrong with absorbing what is useful from many…as long as you are actually training and learning reliably, not just to pad a martial resume youmight say. It is the intent and intesity of the training that make a superior martial artist…not a “superior art”.

From Ed:

We are not talking about “TMAs v. MMAs” here. What we are talking about is separating the “Sports” or “Hobbies” from the path of warriorship. A warrior wears no label. He honestly inventories his surroundings and threats and compares them to the tools he already possesses. If his arsenal contains an effective response, great, he works to perfect the employment of that tool. If it does not, he MUST (becuase he is a warrior, not a student of a specific style) seek out an answer to the problem. If that search crosses the TMA/MMA border in either direction, so be it.

It’s not what you choose to train in, but how and why you choose to train.

The first part really is why. You have to know why you’re training in martial arts to know if you’re getting what you want. I know many people who train in martial arts that couldn’t fight their way out of a paper bag. Is that bad? So long as they are meeting their goals and honest with themselves about their path, no it’s not. I know these people do it for exercise, for recreation, for the social aspect. There’s nothing wrong with that.

The second part is how. You could train in the best combat art style there is, but if it’s not trained towards combat, what good is it? A lot of people dig Krav Maga, and on paper it’s a great combat art. Trouble is, a lot of places teach it like “martial aerobics”; if you want a hard workout great, but if you’re actually wanting to defend yourself, that’s not going to help you. Take an art like Aikido, which when properly used does have real world applicability. But if it’s trained too compliantly, it’s not going to be of much use to you unless your attacker cooperates with you (and how likely is that?).

The third part is what… but really, it’s not. What you train in really doesn’t matter that much. Sure it matters some; if you want become a better puncher, Judo isn’t going to help you as much as western boxing. But for the most part, style isn’t that important. You need to know why you want to train, set your goals, then know how the training needs to be to get you there. Some style might be better served than others, but I’d say what might matter more would be the teacher. My old Kuk Sool instructor, Dewain Perry, may have all this TMA behind him but I know he can kick some ass. Other Kuk Sool instructors I’ve experienced might be able to do one hell of a backflip into a 360Âş spin kick, but they couldn’t fight one lick.

Don’t get too caught up in styles. They have their place, but it’s more about you and your training. It’s more about a good school, a good teacher, and the ability to set and meet goals. Focus on what’s important, discard the rest.

H.R. 308 – misguided

Rep. Carolyn “Shoulder Thing That Goes Up” McCarthy (D-NY) has introduced H.R. 308 “to prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.”

Contact your Congress-critter, tell them how you feel about this.

This is misguided and will only serve to cripple law-abiding citizens. It will not stop crazy. It will not stop evil people from doing evil things. It will cripple good guys from being able to do good things. Consider Business Week Magazine’s recent article about Glock:

Walter garaged his RV and began zooming around in a Porsche, pitching the Glock to force after force. In late 1986 the Miami Police Dept. ordered 1,100 pistols, followed closely by Dallas, San Francisco, and others. “It’s the wave of the future,” said the chief in Minneapolis, who authorized Glocks for his officers. In December 1986, Curtiss Spanos, a cop in Howard County, Md., fired 16 rounds in a 30-minute pursuit of two armed robbery suspects. The Glock saved his life and his partner’s, he told The Washington Post. “There would be two dead officers if I didn’t have the 9 millimeter gun.”

And that from an article with an anti-gun bias.

Sure, that’s police. What about civilians? Well, Tom Givens has had nearly 60 students — private citizens — involved in and that survived incidents because they were carrying their gun. Tom has a presentation that highlights 10 of the incidents and of those while the average number of shots fired was about 4 rounds, the high end was 11. Eleven. So a good guy might be dead today if he was arbitrarily limited, and a bad guy would still be out there doing bad things.

Furthermore, if the legislation understands that capacity matters — because they’re making an exception for law enforcement — why are We The People being subject to this? Are we not as deserving of the ability to protect ourselves and our family? Do they consider us incapable of being responsible and being able to stop evil?  The acts of one lunatic and we need to cripple the millions of other law-abiding citizens?

Once again, Suzanna Gratia-Hupp said it best:

 

How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual… as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of.

 

 

Compromise

This is no different than someone proposing the right to freedom of association should be limited to those groups that pass a sporting purpose test and be restricted to ten people or less. After all you only need five people for a basketball team and ten people can make a baseball team. If you want to associate in groups larger than if can only mean you want to form an angry mob and riot. You don’t need to associate in larger groups than ten, right?

Joe Huffman

11 tips for smart concealed carry

Over at Straight Forward in a Crooked World, Matthew published a great article with 11 tips for smart concealed carry.

Go read the article to get the full G2. Here’s my comments on each point (and you’ll have to read the article to understand the context):

  1. Bottom line is to set goals to help you improve, and work on them.
  2. Everyone cares about home-defense so, have you measured off your home? Do you know how long the longest shot could be? Do you know how long typical shots could be (e.g. across this room, down this hall, etc.)? If the answer is no, go measure.
  3. Vertically between the tracheal notch and xyphoid process, horizontally between the nipples. Or, make a triangle from notch to nipple to nipple to notch. When you line up your handgun iron sights, you can make a line with the top of the sights and the armpits.
  4. What he said.
  5. Minor bit of disagreement here. Overall I agree with him tho.
    1. Slide locks don’t always work (thumbs can and do get in the way).
    2. If you do know the gun is unloaded or otherwise not-operable, do get it back in operation as quickly as possible.
    3. Never holster an unloaded gun. When you go to holster, do reload before you reholster; and of course, only reholster if you are sure you don’t need the gun any more.
  6. If nothing else, having dummy rounds is good for practice. Helps you practice reloads, malfunctions, ball & dummy drill, etc.
  7. Springs are cheap, replace them. Downloading by one (or two in larger cap mags, like 30-round AR mags) is a good guidelines.
  8. Amen.
  9. Amen. I like Comp-Tac.
  10. A-fucking-men. This is probably THE most important point of the entire article.
  11. I’ve been struggling to find a better wallet… the leather on my current one has stretched too far.

What Is Work Ethic?

One of those things that you just stumble across while clicking around the web… What Is Work Ethic?

Click through to the other website to see all the videos, but of them, I thought these two summed it up best:

The first is Will Smith

The second is Kobe Bryant

Quote for the day

Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.

– Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. from his “I Have A Dream” speech

SCAN! SCAN! SCAN!

Reading Low Tech Combat’s 25 best comments of 2010 article, it pointed me to their article about the 11 Key Differences Between Training and the Real Thing. It’s a well-written article highlighting how all of our training, be it for sport or “the street”, is still artificial compared to real-life confrontations. It’s good to be aware of these things and do what you can in your training to remedy them.

One that stood out to me was #11: Tunnel Vision.

Tunnel Vision. The are many effects on the body caused by the stress of combat. Tunnel Vision is arguably the most limiting. It generally happens in conjunction with slow motion time. Tunnel Vision only happens under immense stress. Many people have experienced it to some degree at some stage in their lives. It is there to benefit us and help us focus only on the threat we face and cut out all irrelevant information at that time of danger.

The problem lies when we face more than just one threat. When experiencing Tunnel Vision, naturally we lock onto the threat. We do not look away at all. We are focused 100% on the threat we are facing. The problem with this survival mechanism is apparent when we throw in a second, third or fourth attacker into the equation. It is very easy for them to come at us from the side or rear as we will not detect it as we are 100% focusing on the one threat to our front. Rarely will training get us to experience tunnel vision and the problems this can cause.

Briefly, the best way to break this tunnel vision is through training. Every time you face an attacker in scenarios or multiple attacker training, ALWAYS continue to look left, right and behind you at all times. Maintain 360 degree awareness. In this way, hopefully when you experience tunnel vision when facing a threat, it will be a habit to look around and behind you for others.

In KR Training’s Defensive Pistol Skills 1 class, we introduce this concept to students. The student will shoot a string of fire, then they must scan around to look for one of the assistant instructors holding up a sign telling them what to do next (e.g. shoot target to your left), or maybe no sign at all. The intent is to get the student to break their tunnel vision, look around for more assailants, and if one is found take action. Of course, when students are first introduced to this concept they don’t remember to look around, so inevitably we start yelling “SCAN! SCAN! SCAN!” at them and they get going.

Personally, I like using the command “SCAN!” because it’s a simple, clear, and directed command about what you need to do. It’s so ingrained in my own head that it’s played out for me in pressure situations. For example, I was a student in a force-on-force simulation class and was the “designated good guy” in the simulation. The situation had me at home; I hear the sound of someone breaking in; I hunker down in the bedroom, arm myself, dial 911. Next thing I know, bad guy enters the room and a gunfight ensues. I dispatched the bad guy and I distinctly remember standing there, staring down at him, tunnel vision had set in and my brain starts to say “SCAN! SCAN! SCAN!” so I start scanning just in time to see bad guy #2 show up in the doorway… and we both shot each other. Key point is playing the “SCAN! SCAN! SCAN!” tape over and over in my head after so many practices played out under pressure; yeah I got shot (bad situations don’t always have happy endings) but at least I took him with me, and burned a stronger neural pathway about the importance of scanning (and doing it sooner rather than later).

To relate this to empty-hand martial arts, most martial arts do not incorporate this. Most of your traditional martial arts, if they spar at all, are very single-opponent focused. Some, like Aikido, actually do incorporate multi-person randori but this is exception and not rule. Most of your MMA training is sport-oriented and thus you’re expecting only one person. Even if your chose art doesn’t involve scanning and breaking the 360Âş, YOU can incorporate this into your training. When you spar, scan. When you’re working the bag, scan. When you shadow box, scan. When you spar, add in a second opponent. Just be clear on what your training goals are and work towards those goals; hopefully your coaches, instructors, and training partners will be supportive, else maybe you need to find new ones.

One important point. When you scan, make sure you are actually looking and processing what you see. Don’t just flick your eyes over and around. Make sure you actually SEE and actually PROCESS what’s in your new visual field. Slowing down helps this. Many people finish their scan in about 1 second; sure your moved your head and eyes, but do you recall anything about what you saw? did you process anything about what you saw? Try it now. Do a scan and take about a second to do it; it feels natural, but did you grok what you saw? Now try that same scan but take 3 seconds to do it; now try it with 5 seconds. Yes it’s slower, but now you’re actually processing what you saw. Also, realize there can be a graduated scale of scanning. For instance, I shoot and finish shooting. I may do a quick scan to my right and left (not breaking 180Âş) to look for anything immediate. If that proves all clear, I may start a second scan that goes 360Âş at a slower pace. There’s no one way to do it, you just have to ensure your brain actually processes what you see and you don’t move faster than that, else you waste time doing a double-take to re-parse things.

You must integrate scanning into your practice routine. It must be habit for what you do in practice is what you’ll do when the flag flies. Whether it’s live fire with guns or dry fire practice (especially work it into your dry fire routine!), or empty-hand sparring, make sure you SCAN! SCAN! SCAN!

Crazy K kinda day

Yesterday was crazy, in a good way. 🙂

Remember Sneeze, the rescued duck? He’s now living at Crazy K Farm. Ever since Sneeze’s relocation, the kids have wanted to go back and visit. Heck, Wife and I have wanted to go back and visit as well, since we didn’t get a chance to see the farm in the daylight (and it’s our not-so-secret dream to move to the country, so this is just more fuel for that fire). Not to mention, we’re getting to know Tobi and her crew of her daughter and “Long-Suffering Husband”, and they pretty cool people.

So yesterday we packed everyone (Sasha too) into the car and headed down to the farm to spend some time. When we arrived we got a tour of the property, with the highlight being the finding of Sneeze. Both Sneeze and Squirt look great, better than when they were living here. But that stands to reason, because they’re in an environment of care. Sure, we did our best to care for them, but there’s only so much we’re able to do… the overall environment around here isn’t as friendly and welcoming as being on a dedicated farm. In fact, we were floored at the Muscovy’s we saw at the farm. More varieties, like chocolate ones… some of whom even looked golden. They were simply beautiful birds. But there’s more than Muscovy’s at the farm: a few varieties of goats, geese, other ducks, lots of chickens, guineas, 4 horses and 2 donkeys, and a bunch of livestock guardian dogs. Oh, those dogs were awesome.

The Daughter’s played together, the boys (especially Oldest) enjoyed all the animals. In fact, Oldest was truly in heaven; I know if we lived closer he’d be happy to come to the farm every day to help out. The adults enjoyed some good wine, good conversation, Long-Suffering Husband (Tobi’s nickname for him, per Facebook) grilled some food, we ate, we enjoyed. Of course, the farm must continue to function so there had to be feeding of animals, cleaning of cages, and other chores while we were there. Unfortunately we did have a heartbreaking moment when Tobi discovered one of her best chickens had been killed (we assume by a hawk). There was grief, but also resolve on how to prevent that from happening again (once one of the dogs heals up from his surgery, he’s going to be re-trained to guard that segment of the farm).

BTW… feeding time is LOUD. Geese. They are either on or… well, on; there is no off, and they are loud. Get a large group of them together, and it’s deafening. 🙂

Unfortunately our day had to be cut short since we had to get back to Austin. But what a wonderful time. Making new friends is always a good thing.

Who’s hateful? Who’s violent?

I don’t read Michelle Malkin, but I found this linked to from another blog. It’s titled “The progressive “climate of hate:” An illustrated primer, 2000-2010“.

I post this because in light of events from the past couple weeks, it’s been really bothersome to read how the lefties are touting how non-violent and peaceful they are, and how all the violent rhetoric comes exclusively from the right-side of the aisle. This is false: it spews from both sides quite heavily.

It’s been interesting engaging various lefties about this topic and how they are so quick to point out “their side” never behaves this way: only those that listen to Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, tea-party, and so on. I knew better, but there was no point in trying to convince them because they weren’t going to take off their blinders nor their rose-tinted glasses so I didn’t bother Googling to find examples. So, a little late in bringing the rebuttal to the table (h/t Hecate, and catching up on my RSS feeds), but only because I knew it’d be a waste of my time to Google for it… they could do the same, but they apparently have no interest in looking in the mirror to remove the log from their own eye.

No need to point out the violent rhetoric of the righties… the above lefties, and the mainstream media (but I repeat myself), have already pointed it out to us.

And this is why I think both major political parties suck, and I prefer to be on the sidelines.