OK, that settles it

Yesterday I was waffling about rifles.

This morning, it’s settled.

I went to the local indoor gun range to recheck zero. I took my 6.8 and my .308 bolt-action. I haven’t shot the .308 since the water buffalo, so I figured it would be right to verify it. I knew the 6.8 was where I wanted it, but I had cleaned the gun when I got home so I wanted to shoot it to ensure all was truly good.

I’m glad I did.

I shot the .308 first. The results surprised me: the holes were all over. I’m not totally sure why. Yes, everything was within a 3″ circle at 100 yards, but it should have been around 1″ circle. Things did not go where I was aiming. Sure, it’s still “minute of dead deer”, but after 5 shots I figured it let the rifle cool down and I’ll try again later. I switched to the 6.8 (I’ll recount that momentarily), then came back to the .308. This time 5 rounds and while the grouping was much better, it still wasn’t as tight as it should be. Still, she should be good to take anything out to 250 yards (put the crosshairs in the middle of the target zone, press trigger, it should handle it), but she is going to be backup gun. I’ll have to look deeper into her issues later.

But the 6.8? Oh… she sung.

That’s 5 shots of SSA 6.8 SPC 85 gr. Barnes TSX tactical load at 100 yards. It’s shooting where I want it, grouped decent enough. I should have shot 7 to 10 for a better grouping average but I didn’t have a lot of time this morning and the range was getting pretty busy. Still, it felt right, it was consistent with the last time out.

I can only wonder if the gods are saying to me to leave the .308 behind and shoot the 6.8. It’s what I want to do, and seeing how things went this morning, I feel confident the 6.8 is going to perform this time around and the water buffalo incident was a fluke. The .308 will go with me, but I reckon she’ll be cold all weekend. 🙂

Wish me luck.

Combative Pistol 2 – First Shot

I spent October 23-24, 2010 with Tom Givens of Rangemaster taking his Combative Pistol 2 course, hosted at KR Training. While my general AAR is here, there were some things that came up in class that I wanted to speak about in greater detail. What follows is inspired by something Tom said or we did in class, but is ultimately my take on things and how thoughts gelled in my head. I would encourage you to train with Tom Givens, if you ever have the chance. Reading my blather is no substitute.

The First Shot

Who is the guy that wins?

Many people say it’s the first guy to shoot.

It’s more correct to say, the first guy to get fight-stopping hits.

It’s simple. If the first guy to shoot misses but the second guy nails the first guy square in the chest? The second guy wins. If the first guy shoots and nails the second guy square in the chest, the first guy wins.

There’s a lot implied in that statement.

It implies speed. You have to be fast.

It implies accuracy. The vital area to hit is small and you must hit it. Hits anywhere else just waste time and ammo, and give him a chance to shoot back.

It implies economy. You cannot waste time. If you present the gun and your sights aren’t perfect, take the 0.25 seconds to fix them then press off the shot. Because if you shoot in 1.0 seconds and miss, you’re now down one bullet, one second, and falling behind the curve. To readjust and get a second shot off could take you 1.5 seconds total. But if you shoot in 1.25 seconds because you took that instant to correct yourself and got the fight-stopping hit? That’s the better choice. You have to be fast, but not so fast you miss. You have to be accurate, but not so accurate you take too long.

Which shot is your most important shot? Your first shot. Which shot is the easiest to blow? Your first shot.

The first shot is most important because it may be the one that ends the situation… you may not get nor need any further shots. That first shot must count. But it’s the easiest to blow because you have to pull the gun out, get your hands on it, get gripped, push it out there, finger contact the trigger, finger press the trigger, eyes find the sights, line up the sights…. gosh, there’s a lot to have to do. Subsequent shots? You really just have to reacquire the sights and press the trigger again… harder to blow those shots.

Work on your first shot. Work on it being fast, accurate, solid. It may be the only one you ever get. It may be the one that saves your life.

See? They know what’s best.

You may be a parent, they may be your children, but you don’t know how to best care for them.

Let government do it for you. Government — and our benevolent “leaders” — know best.

San Francisco has become the first major U.S. city to pass a law that cracks down on the popular practice of giving away free toys with unhealthy restaurant meals for children.

San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors passed the law on Tuesday on a veto-proof 8-to-3 vote. It takes effect on December 1.

The law, like an ordinance passed earlier this year in nearby Santa Clara County, would require that restaurant kids’ meals meet certain nutritional standards before they could be sold with toys.

I grant that McDonald’s food is pretty crappy. I try to avoid eating there merely because it’s so bland and there are far better burgers out there. But why should McDonald’s (or any restaurant) be forced to play nanny to your children?

The San Francisco law would allow toys to be given away with kids’ meals that have less than 600 calories, contain fruits and vegetables, and include beverages without excessive fat or sugar.

Backers of the ordinance say it aims to promote healthy eating habits while combating childhood obesity.

Sorry, but that doesn’t really work to combat obesity nor promote healthy eating habits. Parents are still going to drag their kids to McDonald’s, the kids are still going to eat the crappy burger and fries and soda, but now just not get a toy. That people feed their kids this food is far beyond the worthless toy. But hey… we’ve got to do something, right? We’ve got to feel like we’re making a difference, because you know… it’s all for the children, and we’re certainly thinking of them whereas you evil corporations just care about your profits.

“Our children are sick. Rates of obesity in San Francisco are disturbingly high, especially among children of color,” said San Francisco Supervisor Eric Mar, who sponsored the measure.

But amongst all those transparent children…. well, we can’t see them anyways so we don’t know how fat they are.  I hate the term “children of color” because even “white” children have color… and this “well-intended” comment is also pretty bad because it’s implying all those poor dumb Blacks and Hispanics really can’t take care of themselves so here’s big daddy whitey to take care of them because he knows best. *sigh*

That slope… it’s so slippery…. and how far we have slid.

Cold weather = excited dog

Who knew that introducing a lot of wind, some rain, and cold temperatures could get a dog so excited.

Gave Daughter a rough time during a backyard potty break (she took off to play and gave Daughter some “leash burn” on her palms). 😦

It’s like any child… you make some progress, then suddenly they get all stupid again (e.g. enter teenager years) and you have to start over. 😉

Rifle waffle

Deer season opens this coming weekend (gun; archery was last month). I’m getting excited. Already been having dreams, and have been waking up early in anticipation of having to get up early to get out to the property.

I need to run my rifles back by the local indoor range just to (re)verify zero. They should be where I want them, but I can’t help but want to re-verify to be sure. The thing is, using the 6.8 SPC rifle is new… and while I know it will do the job, gosh but something makes me want to use my .308 bolt-action instead. Maybe because it’s proven? Maybe because it’s a big-ass .308″ 168 grain Barnes TSX instead of a 85 grain .277″ TSX. I don’t know. I know it’ll work. I really want to use the 6.8 to take the deer, but the .308 is going to come with me. Maybe it’s the false start with the 6.8 that’s making me waver a bit.

So as I’m packing the rifles up for the range trip, I see that I don’t have as much Federal P308H as I thought I had. This is a Federal factory load, .308 Winchester, 165 grain Barnes TSX. It’s a good round, always performed well for me. But it got me thinking… I want to start on rifle cartridge reloads after deer season calms down. I thought to do .223 Rem to get me back into the swing of rifle reloading. 6.8 is something I want to do. But gosh… if I don’t have a lot of .308 maybe I should just do that to get stocked up.

Too many things buzzing through my head. 🙂 Right now, just need to focus on the deer.

Free Speech Permit

Just a couple of days ago I was reading this article (h/t Uncle) and started thinking to myself “gee… what if we had to go through that much for something like free speech?”  I mean, if you had to go to class, learn the laws, demonstrate proficiency, pass tests, get permits, could have the permit revoked if you didn’t properly exercise your speech, pay all sorts of fees, deal with all sorts of bureaucracy, etc. etc..  If such a thing happened, people would be hysterical and would never allow such a thing. It would be considered unreasonable.

What if such a thing was done for practicing of religion? That before you could practice your religion you had to learn everything about it, demonstrate you could perform the rituals, obtain a license, be forced to renew every 5 years, be fingerprinted and background checked before you could join. Is that reasonable?

Yet, all this permitting and hoopla for gun carry is considered reasonable.

Why?

I mean, you could argue that all of those things would be good before someone could be allowed to speak. Heck, what if we added a requirement that you could only speak English? Would that be reasonable?

Some might say “but a gun can kill”. True, but words can be even more destructive. What’s the difference?

So I was going to write up a nice piece on this, but Linoge took care of it for me. Give it a read. You don’t have to like guns, but if you care about freedom, if you care about consistency and integrity, it’s a hell of a good point.

Combative Pistol 2 – now with pictures!

Lynn Givens was kind enough to send me some pictures from the recent Combative Pistol 2 weekend. I have updated my AAR posting with those pictures.

Here’s one of me on the line:

That PDT Camo Tactical Target is a great target. Well-designed and allows for a lot of very good drills. Tom Hogel (a KR Training assistant instructor) I’m sure is standing over my shoulder watching to see what he can give me hell about. 😉

Election aftermath

Most of the returns are in. A little bit of good, a little bit of bad.

Texas House. I’m not totally hip to Paul Workman, but in theory he’s going to be better than Valinda Bolton. We’ll see how he pans out.

Texas Senate. No question that Jeff Wentworth was going to win it, and generally I’m pleased with that.

And Gov. Good Hair continues to hold office. I’m not surprised Rick Perry won. I did get to watch Bill White’s concession speech, and I found it to be a good one… no real jabs or other bitter-loser b.s. that you often hear. Gained a little respect for the guy after listening to that speech. Am I happy about Perry winning? Well, I’m more happy that Bill White didn’t win. Perry isn’t horrible, but he’s certainly pissed me off a fair deal. And now all his hooting and hollering about things like Texas sovereignty, how well Texas is run, showing those schmoes in Washington how it’s done and keeping them out of Texas business… well, let’s see how well your actions keep up.

And the rest of the Texas state level offices, generally OK with things. It looks like the Texas House gained a lot of Republican seats. We’ll see how that plays into redistricting. I’m also curious what Alice Tripp thinks about how things panned out.

On the national level…

So the Republicans have the US House and MIGHT get the US Senate (as of this writing, 3 races are undecided). Even if the Republicans don’t have Senate majority, there’s no more super-majority.

Ran Paul winning…. I wonder how that will pan out. Will he be like his father and generally vote “no” on everything?

Plus, we won’t have to look at Nancy Pelosi’s face all the time. I consider that a win. 🙂

I am sad that Dr. Donna Campbell didn’t win. But what I was happy about was seeing that Lloyd Doggett didn’t win by much (tally I see says 53% to 45%). Doggett’s past wins were all by 60-something percent wins, so this win is far less decisive. Lloyd are you listening? No, of course you’re not… you’ve already demonstrated you won’t listen to the people you’re supposed to be representing. You keep acting this way and you are going to be gone…especially with redistricting coming up. I’d love to see if Dr. Campbell would run again in 2012.

Governors won a lot of seats as well.

My feeling isn’t so much that people wanted Republicans as people wanted not-Obama. Yesterday’s election results I think were a message to say that we don’t like what’s going on in Washington. People thought the “Tea Party” movement was something to marginalize, but it seems to have been quite the force in yesterday’s results. I’m sure today there will be much talk about “reaching across the aisle” and talks of “compromise” and “bi-partisan solutions” and other such b.s..  I’m sure Democrats will say “OK, you Republicans now have majority… let’s see what you can do” and that’s fair. I loved listening to some Republicans saying last night how they want to return to 2008 spending levels. Uh…. you know, overspending way too fucking much is still overspending way too fucking much. So you know, it’s just going to be business as usual for the most part… *sigh*

I will say, the current setup is going to make the next 2 years rather interesting. And the fun all starts this morning.

My popcorn bowl is pretty deep.

Combative Pistol 2 – It

I spent October 23-24, 2010 with Tom Givens of Rangemaster taking his Combative Pistol 2 course, hosted at KR Training. While my general AAR is here, there were some things that came up in class that I wanted to speak about in greater detail. What follows is inspired by something Tom said or we did in class, but is ultimately my take on things and how thoughts gelled in my head. I would encourage you to train with Tom Givens, if you ever have the chance. Reading my blather is no substitute.

It

  1. Have it.
  2. Be willing to use it
  3. Use it well

Rangemaster – Defensive Shotgun DVD review

When Tom Givens was in town, I was able to pick up a copy of his Defensive Shotgun DVD.

As I’ve written before, my preferred home-defense tool is an AR-15. But in the past some months, I’ve softened my “anti-shotgun” stance. In fact, I find myself more and more drawn to wanting to study the shotgun. So being able to obtain and view a copy of Rangemaster’s DVD provides me with continued exploration of the platform.

Overall? It’s a good DVD providing entry-level information on the topic. If you’re an experienced defensive shotgunner, you may not find much use for thise DVD other than to round out your library. If you’re new to exploring the shotgun as a home or office defensive tool? It’s a good DVD to get you started.

The DVD is divided into 3 sections: introduction, hardware, and software. Tom starts out giving some history and evolution of the shotgun, which is both informative and useful (despite what you may think about a history lesson). He goes into discussion of different types of shotguns, parts, nomenclature, and ways to accessorize the shotgun for maximum performance in the home/office defensive situation. It’s important to understand that Tom is framing things from that particular context: home-defense, office-defense, civilian application. This is not some “high-speed, low-drag black ops” sort of context, nor police work, nor military work, nor something like skeet or sporting clays or duck hunting. Sure, much of that information could be useful there too, but understanding the context of the DVD helps to frame not only who should buy this DVD but also keeps the topics and discussion focused.

A good deal of time is spent talking about ammo, because there is a lot of misconception out there. One strong point Tom makes is how you must pattern your ammo in your gun, because very gun-ammo combination could be different… even the same brand/label of ammo out of the same brand/label of gun (but a different instance of that gun) could behave differently. Tom spent time on the range and went through different ammo with different shotguns to demonstrate performance and how you must pattern and know what’s going on. While a lot of video time was spent to demonstrate this topic, I thought it was one of the better parts of the DVD because people talk about patterning being important but being able to see it hopefully will impress upon the viewer just why it’s important.

Time is then spent talking about basic techniques, from ready positions to reloads. The DVD doesn’t go into great detail about tactics and gunfighting, just basics of how to operate the shotgun. If you really want details of tactics and fighting, attend classes or look elsewhere for that information. That’s one reason I state this DVD is “entry-level” because it spends a lot of time talking hardware, importance of patterning, and basic mechanical shooting skills. It’s good for what it provides.

If there’s any downside to the DVD it’s production. It’s not bad production, just not uber-slick expensive production. It doesn’t look cheap, just that Tom didn’t have a million dollar budget; nothing wrong with that. The only thing I found myself desiring, production-wise, was a better DVD menu/index of all the sections of the DVD so you could easily skip around to each discussion topic or segment. I also noted that while there was discussion of semi-auto and pump shotguns, most of the DVD was oriented towards pump shotguns. It would have been nice to have a little more use of semi-auto shotguns, but perhaps it’s more of a subtle bias — I know I’d rather have a pump shotgun in a defensive situation because it’s simpler, less finicky, and can run even in the worst conditions. Plus, pumps tend to be less expensive and one big argument for the shotgun as a defensive tool is the low-cost.

If you’re looking to utilize a shotgun for home or office defense but don’t know where to start? This DVD will help you out. I will say tho that it’s only a beginning: you will want to seek out proper instruction to really know how to utilize a shotgun in a defensive context.