So I bought that Wilson 6.8 SPC upper. I zeroed it and loved the performance. Then I took it on a harvest/hunt and it didn’t perform, but I think THAT was due to something else (e.g. the scope got knocked out of whack).
Since then, I haven’t shot it. Mostly because I haven’t had time.
But I also haven’t shot it because, since that harvest, I’ve wondered if it was really a worthwhile purchase for me.
Yes, I love what 6.8 SPC brings to the table. There’s a lot of awesome stuff about it, it’s a purpose-designed caliber, and it’s a caliber I’d love to see succeed. I mean, if the military went 6.8 SPC whole-hog over 5.56×45, that’d be HUGE! But what can 6.8 SPC do that .308 Win can’t do, apart from weight/capacity of the round? In all areas of ballistics, the .308 Win beats the 6.8 SPC. The big thing with 6.8 is it has almost .308 ballistics and performance (note: almost) but the round is lighter and smaller thus can fit into 5.56/.223 AR-15/M-4/M-16 form rifles and you can carry more “rounds per ounce” than .308/7.62×51. Plus of course you can use AR-15 “stuff” (lowers, grips, stocks, rails, triggers, etc.). That’s a great selling point, don’t get me wrong… but for my needs and purposes, do I really need it?
Maybe I was just too enamored with the round and had an itch to scratch — blinded by lust, you could say. I know what the pivotal moment was for me that got me rethinking *my* use of 6.8: hitting that water buffalo clean with 168 grains of .30 caliber Barnes Triple Shock at 2500 fps… DRT. I can still see the whole bullet impact on that buffalo plain as day in my head — it’s quite a testimonial. Could the 6.8 have done that? I don’t know. Probably, but it says to me that the .308 certainly does the job on bigger critters (duh!); I know my guide that day was skeptical if the light (tho admittedly fast) .277″ bullet would work. And what with .308/7.62×51 being so standard and so popular, and with 6.8 still being a (growing) niche… with my desire to not have massive caliber-spread… well… it makes me wonder if I should keep the 6.8 upper or not. I always wanted to standardize my library on well-founded calibers, and 6.8 deviated from that standard. But I also admit, while 6.8 SPC is nowhere near the standardized caliber as 9mm, 5.56×45, or 7.62×51, it’s certainly growing in popularity and is far from totally obscure.
The reason I got the 6.8 was for the kids, for hunting. 6.8 is certainly sufficient for anything here in Texas. But you know what I did? I didn’t let the kids try the .308 rifle first. I know they cannot handle my .308 bolt action, it’s just too long and thus “front-heavy” for them (we’ve tried it, dry at home). But if we’re sitting in a blind, is that going to matter that much? I should see how well they can handle the .308 on a bench… I betcha they can, especially given how awesome the recoil pad is on that rifle. Or of course, I could get a compact rifle in .308 for a lot less than the 6.8 upper cost me… and then I wouldn’t have to have 2 sets of ammo. Of course, the same argument could be made the other way: we both carry 6.8’s into the field and thus share ammo.
So, I’m doing some serious reconsideration and thinking about selling my 6.8 upper. Not decided on it yet, but thinking about it. Feel free to convince me to keep it, or to sell it. 🙂 I guess the questions are: what purpose does it serve (for me)? is it a unique purpose, or does it provide redundancy? What event would make it the rifle I’d grab over all other choices?