How to manage geeks

An article from Computerworld on how to manage geeks.

Speaking as a geek, I can say that article is sound. Old school management practices will not work. Once you understand the geek, you’ll see that typically the best thing to do is let them do their job… get out of their way, shield them from crap, do things to enable them to get their work done.

And then we shall… and it shall be productive and glorious. 🙂

Too late?

Via Robbie I find an article from Salon by Camille Paglia. Read that bio if you don’t know who she is as it frames her article.

Some choice quotes from her article:

But this tonic dose of truth-telling may be too little too late. As an Obama supporter and contributor, I am outraged at the slowness with which the standing army of Democratic consultants and commentators publicly expressed discontent with the administration’s strategic missteps this year. I suspect there had been private grumbling all along, but the media warhorses failed to speak out when they should have — from week one after the inauguration, when Obama went flat as a rug in letting Congress pass that obscenely bloated stimulus package. Had more Democrats protested, the administration would have felt less arrogantly emboldened to jam through a cap-and-trade bill whose costs have made it virtually impossible for an alarmed public to accept the gargantuan expenses of national healthcare reform. (Who is naive enough to believe that Obama’s plan would be deficit-neutral? Or that major cuts could be achieved without drastic rationing?)

We all knew years ago that the mainstream media was no longer a source of true journalism. They’ve got agendas to push, like everyone else.

By foolishly trying to reduce all objections to healthcare reform to the malevolence of obstructionist Republicans, Democrats have managed to destroy the national coalition that elected Obama and that is unlikely to be repaired. If Obama fails to win reelection, let the blame be first laid at the door of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who at a pivotal point threw gasoline on the flames by comparing angry American citizens to Nazis. It is theoretically possible that Obama could turn the situation around with a strong speech on healthcare to Congress this week, but after a summer of grisly hemorrhaging, too much damage has been done. At this point, Democrats’ main hope for the 2012 presidential election is that Republicans nominate another hopelessly feeble candidate. Given the GOP’s facility for shooting itself in the foot, that may well happen.

I fear that as well. Nevertheless, the Dems cannot get cocky and think their jobs are a lock. I’ve already heard mutterings like “force it down our throats in 2009? We’ll shove it up your ass in 2010.” The 2010 Congressional elections aren’t too far off, and while it’s only a midpoint for President Obama, it’s going to be one heck of a barometer. Plus if the Democrat majority in Congress gets lost in the election, that will have huge impacts as well. Maybe that’s part of why they’re trying to shove all their pet legislation through now, while they have the short window of opportunity.

*sigh*

Yes, that’s the responsible way to legislate.

Why did it take so long for Democrats to realize that this year’s tea party and town hall uprisings were a genuine barometer of widespread public discontent and not simply a staged scenario by kooks and conspirators?

They’re that out of touch.

Why has the Democratic Party become so arrogantly detached from ordinary Americans? Though they claim to speak for the poor and dispossessed, Democrats have increasingly become the party of an upper-middle-class professional elite, top-heavy with journalists, academics and lawyers (one reason for the hypocritical absence of tort reform in the healthcare bills). Weirdly, given their worship of highly individualistic, secularized self-actualization, such professionals are as a whole amazingly credulous these days about big-government solutions to every social problem. They see no danger in expanding government authority and intrusive, wasteful bureaucracy. This is, I submit, a stunning turn away from the anti-authority and anti-establishment principles of authentic 1960s leftism.

Quite true, and I’ve wondered that myself. I’ve never seen such a group of millionaires that claim to understand “the little people” as much as them. But what’s worse is how those little people believe them. Ah wait, she addresses this further down:

But affluent middle-class Democrats now seem to be complacently servile toward authority and automatically believe everything party leaders tell them. Why? Is it because the new professional class is a glossy product of generically institutionalized learning? Independent thought and logical analysis of argument are no longer taught. Elite education in the U.S. has become a frenetic assembly line of competitive college application to schools where ideological brainwashing is so pandemic that it’s invisible. The top schools, from the Ivy League on down, promote “critical thinking,” which sounds good but is in fact just a style of rote regurgitation of hackneyed approved terms (“racism, sexism, homophobia”) when confronted with any social issue. The Democratic brain has been marinating so long in those clichĂ©s that it’s positively pickled.

Going further into the healthcare debate:

By a proportion of something like 10-to-1, negative articles by conservatives were vastly more detailed, specific and practical about the proposals than were supportive articles by Democrats, which often made gestures rather than arguments and brimmed with emotion and sneers. There was a glaring inability in most Democratic commentary to think ahead and forecast what would or could be the actual snarled consequences — in terms of delays, denial of services, errors, miscommunications and gross invasions of privacy — of a massive single-payer overhaul of the healthcare system in a nation as large and populous as ours. It was as if Democrats live in a utopian dream world, divorced from the daily demands and realities of organization and management.

Amen to that. But that tends to be how many arguments tend to go. If you can’t back it up with facts, make emotional appeals. While emotions are important, it’s generally bad to establish law and policy upon them. Just like with gun control, most of what the pro gun control folks spout are emotional appeals. When you look at the facts, it doesn’t add up.

Thankfully, Ms. Paglia also takes the Republicans to task:

Having said all that about the failures of my own party, I am not about to let Republicans off the hook. What a backbiting mess the GOP is! It lacks even one credible voice of traditional moral values on the national stage and is addicted to sonorous pieties of pharisaical emptiness. Republican politicians sermonize about the sanctity of marriage while racking up divorces and sexual escapades by the truckload. They assail government overreach and yet support interference in women’s control of their own bodies. Advanced whack-a-mole is clearly needed for that yammering smarty-pants Newt Gingrich, who is always so very, very pleased with himself but has yet to produce a single enduring thought. The still inexplicably revered George W. Bush ballooned our national deficits like a drunken sailor and clumsily exacerbated the illegal immigration debate. And bizarrely, the hallucinatory Dick Cheney, a fake-testosterone addict who spooked Bush into a pointless war, continues to be lauded as presidential material.

I couldn’t agree more. I know folks tend to see me as a Democrat/Liberal/Obama basher, and certainly I am critical of them. But that doesn’t mean I’m a Republican/Conservative/Bush lover. I think they suck too. I think the whole “preservation of marriage” stuff is a load of crap — it’s nothing more than anti-homosexual standpoints, because if you really cared to preserve marriage then you’d work on that ugly divorce rate between heterosexuals first! That’s far more a threat to the “sanctity of marriage” than any homosexual ever would be. The PATRIOT Act… don’t get me started on that.

Anyway, heck of an article from Camille Paglia. Go read it.

Combined Skills prep

The Combined Skills class is just a few days away.

I know there are slots still open for the class, but in all honesty I hope the class stays as small as possible. I know, selfish of me to say, but if there are fewer people it means a better teacher-to-student ratio. Better chances for more direct instruction, more time with eyes on me to help teach me and correct my problems, and hopefully more time on the line… don’t have to have 3-4 groups to rotate through, maybe just 2 groups.

But on the same token, I want to ensure that Tom Givens, SouthNarc, and Karl Rehn all get paid for their time and effort, enough to consider it worthwhile to do this again in the future.

That all said, foo.c and I have been preparing for the class. The weather is looking mixed. Temperatures should be pretty good, probably in the high 80’s to low 90’s at most — far better than the mid-100’s we’ve been dealing with all summer long. But rain chances continue to rise. While in some respects training in the rain will be good for us, I also don’t know how much it might screw with the class running smoothly or if it might flat out change some things done in the class… the weather may prevent certain things from being done at all. I don’t know, just have to wait and see. The way the rains tend to be working is heavy and sporadic. So some place will get dumped on for an hour, then that’s it for a while. But it can vary as some spots get nailed for a long time and get a lot of water dumped. This morning, the town of Wimberley (a bit south and west of me) got 3-4″ of rain just this morning. Ouch.

Consequently, a lot of foo.c and my planning is around the rain. Bringing additional guns, hoping for a chance to clean/dry the guns out during the course to contend with rust, bringing multiple changes of clothing in addition to rain gear and towels. It’s going to be… interesting.

I’m looking forward to it tho. It should be quite an educational experience. Long and tiring, but educational.

Why did Apple do this?

No sorry… nothing about today’s Apple fan-boy event. More as to why I didn’t post much today.

Apple’s new OS version is 10.6, named “Snow Leopard.” Snow Leopard brought about a lot of under the hood changes to the OS. One of them is fairly well covered on this page of the Ars Technica review.

Basically, Apple did some stuff very very low level to help with reclaiming some disk space but also taking advantage of the volume format layout of HFS+ and how they can use that to their advantage to speed things up… RAM and CPU’s are wicked fast these days, and disk drives are still abysmally slow by comparison (physics can only go so far). So Apple did some neat things to improve speed and access times, and for the most part it works out great. Most people will never notice.

But in the line of work I do… I’m not most people.

The software I develop in my day job does a lot of working with the file system. So all of these changes that Apple made are actually wreaking havoc and hell on me right now. Long held maxims like a file’s logical size will never be larger than its physical size…. out the door. That calculating sizes is now base-10 instead of base-2 (i.e. 1 kilobyte is now being calculated as 1000 bytes instead of 1024 bytes)… changes a lot of things.

I’ve been reevaluating our entire codebase (which is huge) and this just doesn’t play well with us. All I can do at this point is formulate a lengthy email to Apple’s Developer Technical Support and ask for some help and guidance.

It’s been a trying couple of days.

I’m glad I have Kali class tonight. That should relieve a little stress. 🙂

It depends upon your goals

Via Brillianter I read an article from Low Tech Combat on training realism.

I’m with both of the guys on this: that you need to train in realistic environments or as close as you can get while still safely training, but it can’t only be that. It’s a progression, going from learning in a calm controlled static manner, then moving towards more alive and realistic training.

Low Tech isn’t trying to bash traditional martial arts (TMA) in his article, but the faults he points out are correct that most TMA’s do not train in any sort of stressful and truly combative manner. But is that bad? Not necessarily. I would say it all depends upon the goals of the art, the school, the students as a whole, and the individual student.

If your goal is to be effective in combat, to be able to actually defend yourself if you got attacked “on t3h st433t”, then you better ensure there’s some training that actually simulates that. As Low Tech points out, you need to move beyond calm and relaxed training, there should be surprise, intimidation, it should be all part of the training.

But a lot of people take TMA’s for exercise and physical activity. Some find it as a social outlet. If it’s little more than “physical education” there is nothing wrong with that. If all you do is cooperatively tango with folks at the dojo, that’s fine. There doesn’t need to be yelling, surprise, ratcheting up the force, and so on. And there is nothing wrong with this. Everyone that undertakes martial arts does it for their own reasons, and so long as your training is consistent with your goals and you are honest about your training, that’s fine.

That is the key tho: being honest about your training. Every so often back in my Kuk Sool years there’d be talk about self-defense, being able to deal with “t3h st433t” and so on. But apart from a couple people who just “had it” mentally and physically, I know many of the people in that school would be p0wnd pretty easily because their training rarely if ever went beyond cooperative dancing. I got honest with myself about the training I was receiving, and while good in many respects it was not directly satisfying my goals of being capable in combat, so it was one reason I left.

Bottom line: know your goals, be honest with yourself about your goals and the training you’re receiving. Whatever your goals or reasons are for studying martial arts, as long as everything is in honest alignment, that’s what matters.

What he said

A lot of people were pitching a major fit about President Obama and the speech to the children.

My take? It was somewhat understandable. There’s a lot of distrust of the man, his administration, and the current Congress. With the way things are right now, people were afraid he was going to turn it into some sort of agenda push.

Me? I expected the worst but hoped for the best. This is not the first time a President has spoken to the schoolchildren. And they’re generally always the same sort of thing: stay in school, education is important, study hard, etc.. And every time this happens, the “opposition party” has always come out screaming that the speech is going to be brainwashing the children. So, the speech and the reactions to the speech are just typical… happens all the time, nothing really new to see here.

My take? I homeschool the kids. Now, we had a 4-H meeting today so I couldn’t watch it, but it can be caught on YouTube and the transcript was posted. But the general plan was to go ahead and watch it with our kids. Then no matter what the message, discuss it. I think that’s really the best way to handle just about anything with your children: participate, be involved, discuss, help them understand.

Overall the speech wasn’t too bad. The overall message was a good one, and the illustrations and construction of the speech were alright.

But I do have a few beefs with the speech:

I’ve talked a lot about your government’s responsibility for setting high standards, supporting teachers and principals, and turning around schools that aren’t working where students aren’t getting the opportunities they deserve.

Can someone point out to me where in the US Constitution it says anything about the Federal Government being responsible for education?

The other big thing I wonder is… he spoke a lot about being responsible. He set forth a great number of things — expectations of behavior. I can only hope that he himself, after speaking as he did today, holds himself, his cabinet members, all those czars, members of Congress, etc. to the same standards.

Low Light shooting

Just noticed over at The Box O’ Truth that a large series of articles about Low Light Shooting Essentials has been posted.

If I can promote a bit… Old_Painless himself puts a disclaimer up saying this is informational and you really should seek adequate instruction. If you live in or can get to the Central Texas area, KR Training will be offering their AT-1A Low Light Shooting class on Oct. 24, 2009. It’s a fun class and provides a good and solid introduction to low-light shooting skills.

Who says it’s not a hunting rifle?

See? An M1 Garand works just fine as a hunting rifle.

It shoots .30-06, which is certainly adequate as a hunting round, so why not the rifle itself? I used my M1A on my first hunting trip. Works just fine. But I opted to change to a different rifle for hunting, mostly due to two things: weight and noise. The M1A is a big heavy rifle. If I was sitting in a blind, who cares. But stalking hunting, that weight gets to you after a while. Plus the gun is noisy on two counts. First, the muzzle brake directed a lot of noise back at you and unless you’re wearing hearing protection (which I stupidly wasn’t on that hunt… finally got a set of Pro Ears Stalker Gold’s coming my way) it’s going to hurt. Second, the gun itself was just noisy… the safety is hard and heavy to click off and makes quite a noise when it does.

Still, it’s a fine rifle and I’m sure I’ll hunt with it again at some point.